Strebel RT, Kaplan SA (2021) The state of TURP through a historical lens. World J Urol 39(7):2255–2262

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merheb S, Wang N, Weinberg J, Wang DS, Wason SEL (2021) Online interest in surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia using Google trends. World J Urol 39(7):2655–2659

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

(2019) The industrial revolution for the management of benign prostate obstruction: worldwide publication trends for surgical and medical therapies over the past two decades. Cent Eur J Urol 72(2):149–155

Lee MS, Assmus M, Agarwal D, Large T, Krambeck A (2021) Contemporary practice patterns of transurethral therapies for benign prostate hypertrophy: results of a worldwide survey. World J Urol 39(11):4207–4213

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang TR, Thorogood SL, Sze C, Fisch R, Chughtai B, Te A et al (2023) Current practice patterns in the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 175:157

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barbosa ÁRG, Takemura LS, Amaral BS, Wroclawski ML, Alfer W, Gil AO et al (2022) Benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatment trends in the public health system in São Paulo, Brazil. Einstein São Paulo 20:e6880

Article  Google Scholar 

LaBossiere J, Wallis C, Herschorn S, Carr L, Saskin R, Nam R (2019) Surgical management of benign prostatic obstruction: 20-year population-level trends. Can Urol Assoc J [Internet]. 2019 Oct 7 [cited 2023 Apr 23];14(8). Available from: https://cuaj.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/6224

Patel RM, Bariol S (2019) National trends in surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Australia. ANZ J Surg 89(4):345–349

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Frendl DM, Chen YW, Chang DC, Kim MM (2021) A claims based assessment of reoperation and acute urinary retention after ambulatory transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 205(2):532–538

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cury J, Coelho RF, Bruschini H, Srougi M (2008) Is the ability to perform transurethral resection of the prostate influenced by the surgeon’s previous experience? Clinics 63(3):315–320

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen YK, Lin HC (2008) Association between urologists’ caseload volume and in-hospital mortality for transurethral resection of prostate: a nationwide population-based study. Urology 72(2):329–335

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lim KB, Wong MY, Foo KT (2004) Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) through the decades–a comparison of results over the last thirty years in a single institution in Asia. Ann Acad Med Singapore 33(6):775–779

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tascı AI, Ilbey YO, Tugcu V, Cicekler O, Cevik C, Zoroglu F (2011) Transurethral resection of the prostate with monopolar resectoscope: single-surgeon experience and long-term results of after 3589 procedures. Urology 78(5):1151–1155

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wilson J, Urwin G, Stower M (2004) The changing practice of transurethral prostatectomy: a comparison of cases performed in 1990 and 2000. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86(6):428–431

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abdelwahab O, Habous M, Aziz M, Sultan M, Farag M, Santucci R et al (2019) Bipolar vaporization of the prostate may cause higher complication rates compared to bipolar loop resection: a randomized prospective trial. Int Urol Nephrol 51(12):2143–2148

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abt D, Hechelhammer L, Müllhaupt G, Markart S, Güsewell S, Kessler TM et al (2018) Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. BMJ 361:k2338

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ahmad M, Khan H, Aminullah N, Masood I, Masood W, Malik A (2016) Comparison of bipolar and monopolar Cautry use in Turp for treatment of enlarged prostate. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad JAMC 28(4):758–61

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ahyai SA, Lehrich K, Kuntz RM (2007) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 52(5):1456–1463

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Akman T, Binbay M, Tekinarslan E, Tepeler A, Akcay M, Ozgor F et al (2013) Effects of bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate on urinary and erectile function: a prospective randomized comparative study. BJU Int 111(1):129–136

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Ansari A, Younes N, Sampige VP, Al-Rumaihi K, Ghafouri A, Gul T et al (2010) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up. Eur Urol 58(3):349–355

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Rawashdah SF, Pastore AL, Salhi YA, Fuschi A, Petrozza V, Maurizi A et al (2017) Prospective randomized study comparing monopolar with bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic obstruction: 36-month outcomes. World J Urol 35(10):1595–1601

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Albino G, Marucco EC (2012) TURP and PVP treatments are really similar? From subjective feeling to objective data. Pilot study (proof of concept) prospective randomized trial. Arch Ital Urol Androl Organo Uff Soc Ital Ecogr Urol E Nefrol. 84(4):220–3

Google Scholar 

Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N, d’Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U et al (2014) 180-W XPS GreenLight laser vaporisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 6-month safety and efficacy results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial–the GOLIATH study. Eur Urol 65(5):931–942

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N, d’Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U et al (2015) A european multicenter randomized noninferiority trial comparing 180 W GreenLight XPS laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 12-month results of the GOLIATH study. J Urol 193(2):570–578

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bai F, Feng S, Xu C, Xu Z, Chen J, Zheng Y (2019) Transurethral resection versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial comparing perioperative thrombin generation and fibrinolysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(15):e15223

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Basić D, Stanković J, Potić M, Ignjatović I, Stojković I (2013) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a comparison of clinical results. Acta Chir Iugosl 60(1):15–20

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bouchier-Hayes DM, Van Appledorn S, Bugeja P, Crowe H, Challacombe B, Costello AJ (2010) A randomized trial of photoselective vaporization of the prostate using the 80-W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vs transurethral prostatectomy, with a 1-year follow-up. BJU Int 105(7):964–969

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Capdevila F, Insausti I, Galbete A, Sanchez-Iriso E, Montesino M (2021) Prostatic artery embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a post hoc cost analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 44(11):1771–1777

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Capitán C, Blázquez C, Martin MD, Hernández V, de la Peña E, Llorente C (2011) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Urol 60(4):734–739

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carnevale FC, Iscaife A, Yoshinaga EM, Moreira AM, Antunes AA, Srougi M (2016) Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) versus original and perfected prostate artery embolization (PAE) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): preliminary results of a single center, prospective urodynamic-controlled analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39(1):44–52

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cetinkaya M, Onem K, Rifaioglu MM, Yalcin V (2015) 980-Nm diode laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized controlled study. Urol J 12(5):2355–2361

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen Q, Zhang L, Fan QL, Zhou J, Peng YB, Wang Z (2010) Bipolar transurethral resection in saline vs traditional monopolar resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with a 2-year follow-up. BJU Int 106(9):1339–1343

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cimentepe E, Unsal A, Saglam R (2003) Randomized clinical trial comparing transurethral needle ablation with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results at 18 months. J Endourol 17(2):103–107

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cui D, Sun F, Zhuo J, Sun X, Han B, Zhao F et al (2014) A randomized trial comparing thulium laser resection to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: four-year follow-up results. World J Urol 32(3):683–689

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Demirdag C, Citgez S, Tunc B, Simsekoglu F, Can G, Onal B (2016) The clinical effect of bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate more than 60 milliliters. Urology 98:132–137