Anti-racism in postgraduate medical curricula

Abstract

Racism is a public health threat and is firmly ingrained in the healthcare system. The reasons for this are complex as racism is rooted in historical, political, economic and social structures of society. To improve the health of their patients and the public, doctors must be able to recognise, name and act on the impact of racism. This study aims to understand action taken by postgraduate medical organisations in the UK in the aftermath of the global public reckoning of structural racism and its longstanding impacts on societal health in 2020. We analysed the public statements made by postgraduate medical organisations and then how this relates to the learning outcomes that doctors in training need to complete. We found that while many institutions (n=14) issued public commitments to anti-racism, reviewing the content of all GMC-approved postgraduate curricula (n=102) shows that the majority of UK doctors are receiving minimal or no education or training in anti-racism. As such, we call institutions involved in postgraduate medical education to include anti-racism competencies in medical curricula to support doctors to develop the skills, behaviours and knowledge to name and address the role of racism in health inequalities.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif