Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:393–406.
Munné S, Wells D. Detection of mosaicism at blastocyst stage with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:1085–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.024.
Greco E, Minasi MG, Fiorentino F. Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2089–90. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1500421.
Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Babariya D, Tarozzi N, Borini A, et al. Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid–aneuploid blastocysts. Hum Genet. 2017;136:805–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-017-1797-4.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Victor AR, Tyndall JC, Brake AJ, Lepkowsky LT, Murphy AE, Griffin DK, et al. One hundred mosaic embryos transferred prospectively in a single clinic: exploring when and why they result in healthy pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:280–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.019.
Munné S, Spinella F, Grifo J, Zhang J, Beltran MP, Fragouli E, et al. Clinical outcomes after the transfer of blastocysts characterized as mosaic by high resolution Next Generation Sequencing-further insights. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63:103741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103741.
Viotti M, Victor AR, Barnes FL, Zouves CG, Besser AG, Grifo JA, et al. Using outcome data from one thousand mosaic embryo transfers to formulate an embryo ranking system for clinical use. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:1212–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.041.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Viotti M. O-47. Assessing the risk-benefit of mosaic embryo transfers using 3,500+ clinical outcome data points. Fertil Steril. 2023;120:e20–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.724.
Capalbo A, Poli M, Rienzi L, Girardi L, Patassini C, Fabiani M, et al. Mosaic human preimplantation embryos and their developmental potential in a prospective, non-selection clinical trial. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108:2238–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.11.002.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
De Rycke M, Capalbo A, Coonen E, Coticchio G, Fiorentino F, Goossens V, et al. ESHRE survey results and good practice recommendations on managing chromosomal mosaicism. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022:hoac044. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac044.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Greco E, Yakovlev P, Kornilov N, Vyatkina S, Bogdanova D, Ermakova M, et al. Two clinical case reports of embryonic mosaicism identified with PGT-A persisting during pregnancy as true fetal mosaicism. Hum Reprod. 2023;38:315–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac263.
Kahraman S, Cetinkaya M, Yuksel B, Yesil M, Cetinkaya CP. The birth of a baby with mosaicism resulting from a known mosaic embryo transfer: a case report. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:727–33.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Treff NR, Marin D. The, “mosaic” embryo: misconceptions and misinterpretations in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:1205–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.027.
Nogales MDC, Bronet F, Basile N, María Martínez E, Liñán A, Rodrigo L, et al. Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:229–235.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.019.
Basile N, Nogales MDC, Bronet F, Florensa M, Riqueiros M, Rodrigo L, et al. Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetics analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:699–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.005.
Chavez SL, Loewke KE, Han J, Moussavi F, Colls P, Munne S, et al. Dynamic blastomere behaviour reflects human embryo ploidy by the four-cell stage. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1251. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2249.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Serrano-Novillo C, Uroz L, Màrquez C. Novel time-lapse parameters correlate with embryo ploidy and suggest an improvement in non-invasive embryo selection. J Clin Med. 2023;12:2983. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082983.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Fontes C, et al. Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:477–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.006.
Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, GutiErrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, et al. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:520–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003.
Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, et al. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2245–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew183.
Lee CI, Chen CH, Huang CC, Cheng EH, Chen HH, Ho ST, et al. Embryo morphokinetics is potentially associated with clinical outcomes of single-embryo transfers in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39:569–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.05.020.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Martín Á, Rodrigo L, Beltrán D, Meseguer M, Rubio C, Mercader A, et al. The morphokinetic signature of mosaic embryos: evidence in support of their own genetic identity. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:165–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.031.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Diedrich K, Diedrich C, Santos E, Zoll C, Al-hasani S, Reissmann T, et al. Suppression of the endogenous luteinizing hormone surge by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:788–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138597.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Apter S, Ebner T, Freour T, Guns Y, Kovacic B, Le Clef N, et al. Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology†. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020:Hoaa008. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa008.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocyst. Toward reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond. London: Parthenon Publishing; 1999. pp. 378–88.
Casciani V, Cimadomo D, Trio S, Chiappetta V, Innocenti F, Iussig B, et al. Association between iDAScore v1.0, senior embryologists’ grading and euploidy in 546 blastocysts obtained during 189 PGT-A cycles. Hum Reprod. 2022;37:i280. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac107.182.
Kato K, Ueno S, Berntsen J, Ito M, Shimazaki K, Uchiyama K, Okimura T. Comparing prediction of ongoing pregnancy and live birth outcomes in patients with advanced and younger maternal age patients using KIDScore™ day 5: a large-cohort retrospective study with single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00767-427.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bori L, Meseguer F, Valera MA, Galan A, Remohi J, Meseguer M. The higher the score, the better the clinical outcome: retrospective evaluation of automatic embryo grading as a support tool for embryo selection in IVF laboratories. Hum Reprod. 2022;37:1148–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac066.
Spinella F, Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Bono S, Ruberti A, Cotroneo E, et al. Extent of chromosomal mosaicism influences the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization treatments. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.025.
Viotti M, Greco E, Grifo JA, Madjunkov M, Librach C, Cetinkaya M, et al. Chromosomal, gestational, and neonatal outcomes of embryos classified as mosaic by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2023;120:957–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.022.
留言 (0)