Comparative analysis of cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament medium, light and heavy chain in neurodegenerative diseases using a novel assay for the detection of neurofilament medium chain

Abstract

Objective Neurofilaments are key axonal proteins, with neurofilament light (NfL) and heavy (NfH) chain recognized as promising biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, neurofilament medium chain (NfM) remained previously underexplored due to a lack of quantitative assays. In this study, we developed a sensitive immunoassay to measure NfM in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and analyzed its levels in ALS, Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and Lewy body dementia (LBD). Correlations among neurofilaments and their diagnostic performance were also evaluated. Methods In this study CSF levels of three neurofilament proteins were measured in 271 participants, including patients with ALS (n=91), AD (n=25), FTD (n=38), LBD (n=18), non-neurodegenerative controls (CTRL, n=51), and 48 individuals initially evaluated for ALS but ultimately diagnosed with other conditions (CTRL.DD). Results All three neurofilaments were significantly elevated in ALS compared to CTRL and CTRL.DD groups (p<0.0001 for both), with NfM and NfL also increased in FTD (p<0.0001 for both) and AD (NfM, p=0.0017; NfL, p=0.0135 ) compared to CTRL. NfH demonstrated the greatest distinction between ALS and FTD (p<0.0001). Strong correlations were observed among neurofilament subunits, particularly between NfM and NfL (r=0.94, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96, p<0.0001). All neurofilaments effectively distinguished ALS from CTRL and CTRL.DD, with AUC values ranging from 0.92 to 0.99. NfM and NfL showed high accuracy in differentiating AD (NfM, AUC: 0.89; NfL, AUC: 0.90) and FTD (NfM, AUC: 0.91; NfL, AUC: 0.92) from CTRL, while NfH best separated ALS from FTD (AUC: 0.96). Conclusion This study provides the first quantitative comparison of NfM with NfL and NfH in a neurodegenerative cohort, highlighting its potential diagnostic value. Further research with larger cohorts, longitudinal studies, and investigations into neurofilament distribution in different compartments is needed to clarify the distinct roles of NfM, NfL, and NfH in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological diseases.

Competing Interest Statement

HT reports honoraria for acting as a consultant/speaker and/or for attending events sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Diamed, Fresenius, Fujirebio, GlaxoSmithKline, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens, Teva and Viatris. All conflicts are not relevant to the topic of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Funding Statement

The present study was supported by the Else Kroener Fresenius Foundation and Chemische Fabrik Karl Bucher GmbH.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Ulm (approval number: 20/10) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif