Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Depression Treatment Induces Positive Bias in Task-Related Brain Function: Results From the BRAEN-MAP Trial

Abstract

Antidepressant treatments are theorised to act by inducing a positive bias in information processing early on during treatment. Here, we tested for the first time whether this theory generalises to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment, an effective therapy for treatment-resistant depression. 49 patients with major depression received 20 sessions of open-label intermittent theta-burst stimulation applied to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. At baseline and after eight stimulation sessions, positive bias was assessed using behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging tasks presenting emotional faces. Clinical improvement at the end of treatment was related to an early increase in positive bias (1) in misclassification of emotional faces, (2) in the response of the default mode network (DMN) to emotional faces including rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and (3) in connectivity between rostral ACC and DMN. These neural changes predicted clinical improvement at the end of treatment beyond early symptom reduction. The results suggest that TMS treatment increases positive bias early on during treatment, and that the neural mechanisms might differ from that of antidepressant drugs.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NCT04969549

Clinical Protocols

https://osf.io/rhxm2

Funding Statement

This research was funded by a Newton International Advanced Fellowship (NAFR12/1010). JOS is a Sir Henry Dale Fellow funded by theRoyal Society and the Wellcome Trust (215451/Z/19/Z). The Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging is supported by core funding from the Wellcome Trust (203139/Z/16/Z and 203139/A/16/Z). This project was supported by the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203316). The views expressed arethose of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the National Ethics Committee in Brazil (CAEE: 52384921.6.0000.0068).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Analysis scripts are available at https://osf.io/fmhpt/. Due to the sensitive nature of our data, we are unable to share our data.

https://osf.io/fmhpt/

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif