Del Chiaro M, Torphy RJ, Schulick RD (2021) Pancreatic incidentalomas: investigation and management. J Intern Med 290(5):969–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13359

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beger HG (2018) Benign tumors of the pancreas-radical surgery versus parenchyma-sparing local resection-the challenge facing surgeons. J Gastrointest Surg 22(3):562–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3644-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beger HG, Mayer B, Vasilescu C, Poch B (2022) Long-term metabolic morbidity and steatohepatosis following standard pancreatic resections and parenchyma-sparing, local extirpations for benign tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 275(1):54–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004757

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhou Y, Zhao M, Wu L, Ye F, Si X (2016) Short- and long-term outcomes after enucleation of pancreatic tumors: an evidence-based assessment. Pancreatology 16(6):1092–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2016.07.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giuliani T et al (2023) Pancreatic enucleation patients share the same quality of life as the general population at long-term follow-up: a propensity score-matched analysis. Ann Surg 277(3):e609–e616. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004911

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faitot F et al (2015) Reappraisal of pancreatic enucleations: a single-center experience of 126 procedures. Surgery 158(1):201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.023

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brient C et al (2012) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistulization subsequent to enucleation. J Gastrointest Surg 16(10):1883–1887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1971-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Duconseil P et al (2018) A pancreatic zone at higher risk of fistula after enucleation. World J Surg Oncol 16(1):177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1476-5

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Turrini O et al (2011) Side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreatic head/uncinate: resection or enucleation? HPB 13(2):126–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00256.x

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

AbuHilal M et al (2024) The Brescia internationally validated European guidelines on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (EGUMIPS). Ann Surg 279(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006006

Article  Google Scholar 

Johansen K et al (2023) Quality of life after open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: long-term results from a randomized clinical trial. BJS Open 7(2):zrad002. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad002

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Korrel M et al (2021) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy: an individual patient data meta-analysis of two randomized controlled trials. HPB 23(3):323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.022

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Hilst J et al (2019) Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial). Br J Surg 106(7):910–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11147

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Rooij T et al (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269(1):2–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002979

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang Z et al (2023) Minimally invasive enucleation versus open enucleation for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic neoplasms: effects on clinical outcomes and quality of life. J Minimal Access Surg 19(3):419–426

Article  Google Scholar 

Kabir T, Tan ZZX, Syn N, Chung AYF, Ooi LLPJ, Goh BKP (2019) Minimally-invasive versus open enucleation for pancreatic tumours: a propensity-score adjusted analysis. Ann Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 23(3):258–264. https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.3.258

Article  Google Scholar 

Roesel R, Bernardi L, Bonino MA, Popeskou SG, Garofalo F, Cristaudi A (2023) Minimally-invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation: systematic review and metanalysis of short-term outcomes. HPB 25(6):603–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2023.02.014

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang R-C et al (2016) Laparoscopic versus open enucleation for pancreatic neoplasms: clinical outcomes and pancreatic function analysis. Surg Endosc 30(7):2657–2665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4538-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tian F et al (2016) Propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus open surgical enucleation for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Br J Surg 103(10):1358–1364. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10220

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

von Elm E et al (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet Lond Engl 370(9596):1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X

Article  Google Scholar 

Van Roessel S et al (2020) Textbook outcome: nationwide analysis of a novel quality measure in pancreatic surgery. Ann Surg 271(1):155–162. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003451

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bassi C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wente MN et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)—an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142(1):20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wente MN et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chua TC, Yang TX, Gill AJ, Samra JS (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enucleation versus standardized resection for small pancreatic lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 23(2):592–599. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4826-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hüttner FJ, Koessler-Ebs J, Hackert T, Ulrich A, Büchler MW, Diener MK (2015) Meta-analysis of surgical outcome after enucleation versus standard resection for pancreatic neoplasms. Br J Surg 102(9):1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9819

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang X et al (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an analysis from the U.S. neuroendocrine tumor study group. J Surg Oncol 120(2):231–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25481

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dedieu A, Rault A, Collet D, Masson B, Sa Cunha A (2011) Laparoscopic enucleation of pancreatic neoplasm. Surg Endosc 25(2):572–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1223-7

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Costi R, Randone B, Mal F, Basato S, Lévard H, Gayet B (2013) A critical appraisal of laparoscopic pancreatic enucleations: right-sided procedures (pancreatic head, uncus) are not mini-invasive surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(6):524–531. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828e3d86

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Song KB et al (2015) Enucleation for benign or low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas: single-center experience with 65 consecutive patients. Surgery 158(5):1203–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.10.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shi Y et al (2016) Pancreatic enucleation using the da Vinci robotic surgical system: a report of 26 cases. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. 12(4):751–757. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1719

Article  Google Scholar 

Jin J et al (2016) Robotic enucleation for benign or borderline tumours of the pancreas: a retrospective analysis and comparison from a high-volume centre in Asia. World J Surg 40(12):3009–3020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3655-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar