Fjose M, Eilertsen G, Kirkevold M, Grov EK. A valuable but demanding time family life during advanced cancer in an elderly family member. Adv Nurs Sci. 2016;39(4):358–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000145.

Article  Google Scholar 

Möllerberg ML, Sandgren A, Lithman T, Noreen D, Olsson H, Sjövall K. The effects of a cancer diagnosis on the health of a patient’s partner: a population-based registry study of cancer in Sweden. Eur J Cancer Care. 2016;25(5):744–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(15)30025-3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Möllerberg ML, Sandgren A, Swahnberg K, Benzein E. Familial interaction patterns during the palliative phase of a family member living with cancer. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2017;19(1):67–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12487.

Article  Google Scholar 

Regonal Cancer Center. National palliative care guidelines in Sweden. Available from: https://kunskapsbanken.cancercentrum.se/diagnoser/palliativ-vard/vardprogram/.

Thomas PA, Liu H, Umberson D. Family relationships and well-being. Innov. Aging. 2017;1(3):igx025. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx025.

Article  Google Scholar 

Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass; 1987.

Google Scholar 

Möllerberg ML, Årestedt K, Swahnberg K, Benzein E, Sandgren A. Family sense of coherence and its associations with hope, anxiety and symptoms of depression in persons with cancer in palliative phase and their family members: A cross-sectional study. Palliat Med. 2019;33(10):1310–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216319866653.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ngai FW, Ngu SF. Family sense of coherence and quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(8):2031–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ngai FW, Ngu SF. Family sense of coherence and family adaptation among childbearing couples. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014;46(2):82–90.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Larsen Moen Ø, Hall-Lord ML. Reliability and validity of the Norwegian family sense of coherence scale. Open J Nurs. 2016;06(12):1075–86. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2016.612102.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lustig DC, Akey T. Adaptation in Families with adult children with mental retardation: impact of family strengths and appraisal. Educ Train Ment Retard Dev Disabil. 1999;34(3):260–70.

Google Scholar 

Heydari F, Nikfarid L, Oujian P, Nasiri M, Motefakker S. Predictors of perceived family sense of coherence in parents of children with cancer. Indian J Palliat Care. 2022;28(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.25259/IJPC_107_21.

Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(6):725–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Antonovsky A, Sourani T. Family Sense of Coherence and Family Adaptation. J Marriage Fam. 1988;50(1):79–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/352429.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sagy S. Effects of Personal, Family, and Community Characteristics on Emotional Reactions in a Stress Situation: The Golan Heights Negotiations. Youth Soc. 1998;29(3):311–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x98029003003.

Article  Google Scholar 

Çeçen AR. The Turkish Version of the Family Sense of Coherence Scale- Short Form (FSOC-S): Initial Development and Validation. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. 2007;7(3):1211–8.

Google Scholar 

Ngai FW, Ngu SF. Translation and Validation of a Chinese Version of the Family Sense of Coherence Scale in Chinese Childbearing Families. Nurs Res. 2011;60(5):295–301.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stemmler M, von Eye A, Wiedermann W. Dependent data in social sciences research. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 145. Springer: Berlin; 345–367. 2015. Available from: http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20585-4

Andrich D. Controversy and the rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Med Care. 2004;42(1):I7–16.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Thompson AJ. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(12):1094–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70290-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pendrill L. Man as a Measurement Instrument. NCSLI Meas. 2014;9(4):24–35.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kenny DA, Judd CM. Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychol Bull. 1986;99:422–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.422.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kenny DA. Commentary: Dyadic Analyses of Family Data. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011;36(5):630–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsq124.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press; 2006.

Google Scholar 

Claxton SE, DeLuca HK, Van Dulmen MHM. Testing psychometric properties in dyadic data using confirmatory factor analysis: current practices and recommendations. TPM - Test Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol. 2015;22(2):181–98. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM22.2.2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Möllerberg ML, Årestedt K, Sandgren A, Benzein E, Swahnberg K. Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the short version of family sense of coherence scale in a sample of persons with cancer in the palliative stage and their family members. Palliat Support Care. 2020;18(1):24–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951519000592.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wright LM, Leahey M. Nurses and families: a guide to family assessment and intervention. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2013.

Google Scholar 

Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1982.

Google Scholar 

Linacre JM. Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com; 2020. https://www.winsteps.com/index.htm.

Hobart JC, Cano SJ. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(12). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta13120.

Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis & Rheumatism-Arthritis Care & Research. 2007;15;57(8):1358–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23108.

Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978;43(4):561–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293814.

Article  Google Scholar 

Linacre JM. What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean – ScienceOpen. 2002. Available from: https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=2bac12d4-945c-4baf-bd16-725c824b40da

Boone WJ, Staver JR. Principal component analysis of residuals (PCAR). In: Boone WJ, Staver JR, editors. Advances in rasch analyses in the human sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43420-5_2.

Wright BD. Rack and Stack: Time 1 vs. Time 2 or Pre-Test vs. Post-Test. Rasch Meas Trans. 2003;17(1):905–6. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt171a.htm.

Andrich D, Kreiner S. Quantifying response dependence between two dichotomous items using the rasch model. Appl Psychol Meas. 2010;34(3):181–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621609360202.

Article  Google Scholar 

Andrich D, Humphry SM, Marais I. Quantifying local, response dependence between two polytomous items using the rasch model. Appl Psychol Meas. 2012;36(4):309–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621612441858.

Article  Google Scholar 

Olsbjerg M, Christensen KB. Modeling local dependence in longitudinal IRT models. Behav Res Methods. 2015;47(4):1413–24. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0553-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cano SJ, Hobart JC. The problem with health measurement. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:279–90. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S14399.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barbic SP, Cano SJ, Mathias S. The problem of patient-centred outcome measurement in psychiatry: why metrology hasn’t mattered and why it should. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1044:012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1044/1/012069

Bell JM, Wright LM. The illness beliefs model: advancing practice knowledge about illness beliefs, family healing, and family interventions. J Fam Nurs. 2015;21(2):179–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840715586889.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bateson G, Brand S, Goleman D, May R, Rieber R, Wilden A. The pattern that connects : eco-cybernetic texts[Swedish: Mönstret som förbinder:eko-cybernetiska texter]. Stockholm: Mareld; 1998.

Google Scholar 

Cano SJ, Barrett LE, Zajicek JP, Hobart JC. Dimensionality is a relative concept. Mult Scler J. 2011;17(7):893–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458511406910.

Article  Google Scholar 

Linacre JM. Dimensionality: when is a test multidimensional?: Winsteps Help. 2023 Available from: https://www.winsteps.com/winman/dimensionality.htm.

Melin J, Cano S, Pendrill L. The role of entropy in construct specification equations (CSE) to improve the validity of memory tests. Entropy. 2021;23(2):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23020212.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Andrich D. Recognizing a Violation of the assumption of local independence in the analysis of test data. Educ Psychol Meas. 1983;43(3):829–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448304300318.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marais I. Local Dependence. In: Christensen KB, Kreiner S, Mesbah M. Rasch models in health. Wiley; 2012. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574454.ch7

Christensen KB, Makransky G, Horton M. Critical values for Yen’s Q3: identification of local dependence in the rasch model using residual correlations. Appl Psychol Meas. 2017;41(3):178–94.