Plant uptake of micro- and nanoplastics can lead to contamination of food with plastic particles and subsequent human consumption of plastics. There is evidence that plant roots can take up micro- and nanoplastics; however, most of this evidence stems from experiments conducted with plants grown in hydroponics or agar systems where uptake of nanoparticles by roots is more favorable than when plants were grown in soil. Here, we discern the root uptake and accumulation of polystyrene nanospheres in plants grown in different growing media: agar, hydroponics, and soil. In addition, we tested the impacts of nanospheres on plant biomass and plant stress. Wheat and Arabidopsis thaliana were grown in agar, hydroponics, and soil media and exposed to polystyrene nanospheres. Three different nanospheres were used (40 nm and 200 nm carboxylate-modified and 200 nm amino-modified polystyrene) and uniformly mixed into the growing media. Plants were grown for 7 to 10 days and roots were then examined for the presence of nanospheres by confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Plant stress was evaluated by measuring reactive oxygen species (ROS). We observed the 40 nm nanospheres inside plant roots, but the 200 nm nanospheres only adhered to root cap cells showing no uptake into the roots. Furthermore, confocal images indicated that root uptake of nanospheres was favored in hydroponic solutions as compared to agar and soil media. Plant biomass was generally not affected by the nanospheres, except for hydroponically grown A.~thaliana, where biomass was significantly reduced. Small sized (40 nm) and positively charged (200 nm amino-modified) nanospheres showed higher ROS accumulation in plants than negatively charged 200 nm carboxylate-modified nanospheres. This study provides evidence that polystyrene nanospheres can be taken up into the interior of plant roots and cause plant stress, but these impacts are less pronounced in media where the plastic particles are less mobile, like in agar and soil media as compared to hydroponic systems.

You have access to this article

Please wait while we load your content... Something went wrong. Try again?