Efficacy of modified natural cycle vs. hormone replacement therapy in oocyte donation for recipients of advanced maternal age: a retrospective study

European IVF Monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), Smeenk J, Wyns C, De Geyter C, Kupka M, Bergh C, et al. ART in Europe, 2019: results generated from European registries by ESHRE†. Hum Reprod. 2023;38:2321–38.

Buster JE, Bustillo M, Thorneycroft IH, Simon JA, Boyers SP, Marshall JR, et al. Non-surgical transfer of in vivo fertilised donated ova to five infertile women: report of two pregnancies. Lancet. 1983;2:223–4.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zaat TR, Kostova EB, Korsen P, Showell MG, Mol F, van Wely M. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after natural versus artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer and the role of luteal phase support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2023;dmad011.

Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:139–55.

PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Groenewoud ER, Cohlen BJ, Al-Oraiby A, Brinkhuis EA, Broekmans FJM, de Bruin JP, et al. A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1483–92.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Labarta E, Mariani G, Holtmann N, Celada P, Remohí J, Bosch E. Low serum progesterone on the day of embryo transfer is associated with a diminished ongoing pregnancy rate in oocyte donation cycles after artificial endometrial preparation: a prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:2437–42.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1270–83.

Li C, He Y-C, Xu J-J, Wang Y, Liu H, Duan C-C, et al. Perinatal outcomes of neonates born from different endometrial preparation protocols after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:341.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kolte AM, Bernardi LA, Christiansen OB, Quenby S, Farquharson RG, Goddijn M, et al. Terminology for pregnancy loss prior to viability: a consensus statement from the ESHRE early pregnancy special interest group. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:495–8.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:393–406.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Agha-Hosseini M, Hashemi L, Aleyasin A, Ghasemi M, Sarvi F, ShabaniNashtaei M, et al. Natural cycle versus artificial cycle in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized prospective trial. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;15:12–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Santoro N, Brown JR, Adel T, Skurnick JH. Characterization of reproductive hormonal dynamics in the perimenopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:1495–501.

PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Glujovsky D, Pesce R, Sueldo C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Hart RJ, Ciapponi A. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;10:CD006359.

Roelens C, Blockeel C. Impact of different endometrial preparation protocols before frozen embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes: a review. Fertil Steril. 2022;118:820–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Altmäe S, Tamm-Rosenstein K, Esteban FJ, Simm J, Kolberg L, Peterson H, et al. Endometrial transcriptome analysis indicates superiority of natural over artificial cycles in recurrent implantation failure patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32:597–613.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Attali E, Yogev Y. The impact of advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;70:2–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lutjen P, Trounson A, Leeton J, Findlay J, Wood C, Renou P. The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature. 1984;307:174–5.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Castillo J, Kol S. Ideal frozen embryo transfer regime. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2024;36:148–54.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alonso-Mayo C, Kohls G, Santos-Ribeiro S, Soares SR, Garcia-Velasco JA. Modified natural cycle allows a window of seven days for frozen embryo transfer planning. Reproductive BioMedicine Online [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 16];0. Available from: https://www.rbmojournal.com/article/S1472-6483(23)00873-8/fulltext

Mendes Godinho C, Soares SR, Nunes SG, Martínez JMM, Santos-Ribeiro S. Natural proliferative phase frozen embryo transfer-a new approach which may facilitate scheduling without hindering pregnancy outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2024;39:1089–97.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moffa F, Garcia-Faura A, Novo S, Perez-Alzueta A, Acin L, Moreno A, et al. O-022 Shall we go “natural” for endometrial preparation in egg donation programs? Live birth rates and obstetrical outcome from 797 frozen single-blastocyst transfers cycles. Human Reproduction. 2023;38:dead093.022.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif