Celiac disease (CeD) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disorder influenced by genetic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors. However, little is known about clinical manifestations and genetic risks in minority populations. Using data from the All of Us Research Program, we analyzed 3,040 CeD patients, referred to as the AoU-CeD cohort, to identify clinical and genetic differences across racial and ethnic groups in the United States. CeD prevalence was highest among White individuals (1.08%) and significantly lower among Hispanic (0.36%) and Black (0.16%) populations. The majority of CeD patients were female (78.4%) and diagnosed between the ages of 18 and 64. Minority groups reported poorer physical and mental quality of life (QoL) and higher levels of pain. Ancestry-specific patterns emerged in CeD-associated conditions, with minorities more likely to report diarrhea and non-infectious gastroenteritis but less likely to have osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, chronic fatigue, or a family history of CeD. Compared to previously reported data showing that over 90% of CeD patients carry the HLA-DQ2.5 haplotype, genetic analysis revealed that only 49% of patients in the AoU-CeD cohort carried the high-risk HLA-DQ2.5 haplotype. Additionally, 16.5% lacked known HLA-DQ risk haplotypes, suggesting potential diagnostic or reporting inaccuracies. Minority groups exhibited higher rates of atypical symptoms, lower frequencies of the DQ2.5 haplotype, and distinct distributions of HLA-DQ genotypes. A long haplotype block spanning HLA-A1, B8, C7 and HLA-DQ2.5 was found in Europeans but absent in other ancestries. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) using over 11 million variants from whole-genome sequencing data identified 1,651 significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), primarily within the MHC locus, with the strongest signals observed predominantly among individuals of European ancestry. A predictive model incorporating HLA-DQ genotype, family history, and clinical features achieved 83% accuracy for identifying seropositive CeD. These results highlight the importance of ancestry-specific clinical presentations and genetic features in CeD.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

The All of Us research program is supported by the National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director: Regional Medical Centers: 1 OT2 OD026549; 1 OT2 OD026554; 1 OT2 OD026557; 1OT2 OD026556; 1 OT2 OD026550; 1 OT2 OD 026552; 1 OT2 OD026553; 1 OT2 OD026548; 1OT2 OD026551; 1 OT2 OD026555; IAA #: AOD 16037; Federally Qualified Health Centers: HHSN 263201600085U; Data and Research Center: 5 U2C OD023196; Biobank: 1 U24OD023121; The Participant Center: U24 OD023176; Participant Technology Systems Center: 1U24 OD023163; Communications and Engagement: 3 OT2 OD023205; 3 OT2 OD023206; and Community Partners: 1 OT2 OD025277; 3 OT2 OD025315; 1 OT2 OD025337; 1 OT2OD025276. The All of Us Research Program would not be possible without the partnership of its participants.Dr. Xiao-Fei Kong was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K08DK128631 and Disease-Oriented Clinical Scholars Program at the UT Southwestern Medical Center.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All data collection and analysis involving human participants were approved by the Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the All of Us Research Program (AoU IRB Protocol Number: 2021-02-TN-001) .

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

The data and code used in this study are available as a shared workspace to registered researchers of the All of Us Researcher Workbench. For information about access, please visit https://www.researchallofus.org/.

https://www.researchallofus.org/