Ross JS, Tse T, Zarin DA, Xu H, Zhou L, Krumholz HM. Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:d7292.

Chen R, Desai NR, Ross JS, Zhang W, Chau KH, Wayda B, et al. Publication and reporting of clinical trial results: cross sectional analysis across academic medical centers. BMJ. 2016;352: i637.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(8):iii–ix−xi, 1–193.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta‐analysis. In: Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M, editors. Publication bias in meta‐analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. 2005. p. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1.

Minogue V, Cooke M, Donskoy A-L, Vicary P, Wells B. Patient and public involvement in reducing health and care research waste. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(5):1–8.

Google Scholar 

Jordan VMB, Farquhar CM. Is there any hope that we can reduce research wastage and prevent publication bias? J Hosp Man Health Pol. 2019;3(1):1–3.

Google Scholar 

Feinstein AR, Horwitz RI. Double standards, scientific methods, and epidemiologic research. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(26):1611–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Australian Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2023 [7 November 2023]. Available from: https://www.australianclinicaltrials.gov.au/about/how-they-work.

Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. The Lancet. 2002;359(9305):515–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Siegfried N, Clarke M, Volmink J. Randomised controlled trials in Africa of HIV and AIDS: descriptive study and spatial distribution. BMJ. 2005;331(7519):742.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wieseler B. Beyond journal publications–a new format for the publication of clinical trials. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017;120:3–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. Strengthening clinical trials to provide high- quality evidence on health interventions and to improve research quality and coordination. In: Seventy- fifth World Health Assembly. Geneva; 2022. Available: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_ACONF9-en.pdf.

World Health Organization. Joint statement on public disclosure of results from clinical trials. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/18-05-2017-joint-statement-on-registration.

Schulz KF AD, Moher D for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: update guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials, which was published simultaneously in nine journals, see the EQUATOR Network link [website] [Available from: https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/consort/.

World Health Organization. WHO policy on open access Geneva: World Health Organization [website] [Available from: https://www.who.int/about/policies/publishing/open-access.

Ross JS, Lehman R, Gross CP. The importance of clinical trial data sharing: toward more open science. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(2):238–40.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Krumholz HM. Open science and data sharing in clinical research: basing informed decisions on the totality of the evidence. Am Heart Assoc; 2012:141–2.

Whitty CJM. What makes an academic paper useful for health policy?. BMC Med. 2015;13:301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0544-8.

Ross JS, Tse T, Zarin DA, Xu H, Zhou L, Krumholz HM. Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials. gov: cross sectional analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:d7292.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Manzoli L, Flacco ME, D’Addario M, Capasso L, De Vito C, Marzuillo C, et al. Non-publication and delayed publication of randomized trials on vaccines: survey. BMJ. 2014;348: g3058.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):86–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: Is 85% of health research really “wasted”? The BMJ. 2016.

Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991;337(8746):867–72.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ioannidis JP. Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. JAMA. 1998;279(4):281–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ross JS, Mocanu M, Lampropulos JF, Tse T, Krumholz HM. Time to publication among completed clinical trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(9):825–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, Nissen SE, Krumholz HM. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials. Gov: a cross-sectional analysis. PLoS Med. 2009;6(9):e1000144.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ, Group RB. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias—an updated review. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7): e66844.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chan AW, Song F, Vickers A, Jefferson T, Dickersin K, Gotzsche PC, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):257–66.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Clarke M, Hopewell S, Chalmers L. Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report. J R Soc Med. 2007;100(4):187–90.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Thaler K, Kien C, Nussbaumer B, Van Noord MG, Griebler U, Klerings I, et al. Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(7):792–802.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(8):1–220.

Article  Google Scholar 

Malički M, Marušić A. Is there a solution to publication bias? Researchers call for changes in dissemination of clinical research results. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(10):1103–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kien C, Nußbaumer B, Thaler KJ, Griebler U, Van Noord MG, Wagner P, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):551.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carroll HA, Toumpakari Z, Johnson L, Betts JA. The perceived feasibility of methods to reduce publication bias. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10): e0186472.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peters MDJ GC, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E MZ, editor. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. JBI; 2020. p. 407–52.

Galipeau J, Moher D, Campbell C, Hendry P, Cameron DW, Palepu A, et al. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(3):257–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Briscoe S, Littlewood A, Marshall C, Metzendorf MI, et al. Searching for and selecting studies. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2019:67–107.

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Weiss BD, Stillwater BJ, Aldulaimi S, Cunningham JK, Gachupin FC, Koleski J, et al. Writing support group for medical school faculty—a simple way to do it. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2022:1–8.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, The PRISMA, et al. statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2020;2021:372.

Google Scholar 

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sonnad SS, Goldsack J, McGowan KL. A writing group for female assistant professors. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011;103(9–10):811–5.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bellicoso D, Valenzano TJ, Topolovec-Vranic J. Effectiveness of a manuscript writing workshop on writing confidence amongst nursing and health disciplines clinicians. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2022.

Bourgault AM, Galura SJ, Kinchen EV, Peach BC. Faculty writing accountability groups: a protocol for traditional and virtual settings. J Prof Nurs. 2022;38:97–103.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brandon C, Jamadar D, Girish G, Dong Q, Morag Y, Mullan P. Peer support of a faculty “writers’ circle” increases confidence and productivity in generating scholarship. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(4):534–8.

Article  PubMed