Teasell, R. W., Murie Fernandez, M., McIntyre, A., & Mehta, S. (2014). Rethinking the continuum of stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(4), 595–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.014

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2005). Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1225–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-4773-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Johnston, B., Patrick, D., Devji, T., Maxwell, L., Bingham III, C., Beaton, D., Busse, J. (2022). Chapter 18: Patient-reported outcomes. In Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3. Cochrane. Retrieved from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

Cameron, L. J., Wales, K., Casey, A., Pike, S., Jolliffe, L., Schneider, E. J., & Lannin, N. A. (2022). Self-reported quality of life following stroke: A systematic review of instruments with a focus on their psychometric properties. Quality of Life Research, 31(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02944-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hilari, K., Lamping, D. L., Smith, S. C., Northcott, S., Lamb, A., & Marshall, J. (2009). Psychometric properties of the stroke and aphasia quality of life scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23(6), 544–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508101729

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Longworth, L., Singh, J., & Brazier, J. (2014). An evaluation of the performance of Eq-5d: A review of reviews of psychometric properties. Value in Health, 17(7), A570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1907

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Philipp, R., Lebherz, L., Thomalla, G., Härter, M., Appelbohm, H., Frese, M., & Kriston, L. (2021). Psychometric properties of a patient-reported outcome set in acute stroke patients. Brain and Behavior, 11(8), e2249. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2249

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C., Chiarotto, A., De Vet, H., Westerman, M., Patrick, D., & Mokkink, L. (2017). COSMIN standards and criteria for evaluating the content validity of health‐related Patient‐reported outcome measures: A Delphi study.

WHO. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. World Health Organization.

Google Scholar 

Geyh, S., Cieza, A., Schouten, J., Dickson, H., Frommelt, P., Omar, Z., & Stucki, G. (2004). ICF core sets for stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501960410016776

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glässel, A., Coenen, M., Kollerits, B., & Cieza, A. (2012). Validation of the extended ICF core set for stroke from the patient perspective using focus groups. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.593680

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Geyh, S., Cieza, A., Kollerits, B., Grimby, G., & Stucki, G. (2007). Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 16(5), 833–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9174-8

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lu, Z., MacDermid, J. C., & Rosenbaum, P. (2020). A narrative review and content analysis of functional and quality of life measures used to evaluate the outcome after TSA: An ICF linking application. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21(1), 228. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03238-w

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Norlander, A., Jönsson, A.-C., Ståhl, A., Lindgren, A., & Iwarsson, S. (2016). Activity among long-term stroke survivors. A study based on an ICF-oriented analysis of two established ADL and social activity instruments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(20), 2028–2037. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1111437

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vincent, J. I., MacDermid, J. C., King, G. J. W., & Grewal, R. (2015). Linking of the patient rated elbow evaluation (PREE) and the American shoulder and elbow surgeons—elbow questionnaire (pASES-e) to the international classification of functioning disability and health (ICF) and hand core sets. Journal of Hand Therapy, 28(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2014.10.002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cieza, A., Fayed, N., Bickenbach, J., & Prodinger, B. (2019). Refinements of the ICF linking rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(5), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

MacDermid, J. C. (2021). ICF linking and cognitive interviewing are complementary methods for optimizing content validity of outcome measures: An integrated methods review. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.702596

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rosa, D., MacDermid, J., & Klubowicz, D. (2021). A comparative performance analysis of the international classification of functioning, disability and health and the item-perspective classification framework for classifying the content of patient reported outcome measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01774-0

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Veritas Health Innovation. (n.d.). Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from www.covidence.org.

Ballert, C. S., Hopfe, M., Kus, S., Mader, L., & Prodinger, B. (2019). Using the refined ICF linking rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: A systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments measuring participation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(5), 584–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1198433

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Studenski, S., Lai, S. M., & Johnson, D. (2001). Conceptualization of a new stroke-specific outcome measure: The stroke impact scale. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 8(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1310/BRHX-PKTA-0TUJ-UYWT

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Williams, L. S., Weinberger, M., Harris, L. E., Clark, D. O., & Biller, J. (1999). Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke, 30(7), 1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.7.1362

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hilari, K., Byng, S., Lamping, D. L., & Smith, S. C. (2003). Stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39 (SAQOL-39). Stroke, 34(8), 1944–1950. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000081987.46660.ED

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schnitzler, A., Jourdan, C., Josseran, L., Azouvi, P., Jacob, L., & Genêt, F. (2019). Participation in work and leisure activities after stroke: A national study. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 62(5), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.04.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Woodman, P., Riazi, A., Pereira, C., & Jones, F. (2014). Social participation post stroke: A meta-ethnographic review of the experiences and views of community-dwelling stroke survivors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(24), 2031–2043. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.887796

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schepers, V. P. M., Ketelaar, M., van de Port, I. G. L., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., & Lindeman, E. (2007). Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning disability and health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600756257

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naqvi, I. A., Montiel, T. C., Bittar, Y., Hunter, N., Okpala, M., Johnson, C., & Beauchamp, J. E. S. (2021). Internet access and usage among stroke survivors and their informal caregivers: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(3), e25123. https://doi.org/10.2196/25123

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gustavsson, M., Ytterberg, C., Nabsen Marwaa, M., Tham, K., & Guidetti, S. (2018). Experiences of using information and communication technology within the first year after stroke—A grounded theory study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(5), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1264012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Freund, M., Carey, M., Dilworth, S., Waller, A., Mansfield, E., Rose, A., Thienel, R., & Hyde, L. (2022). Effectiveness of information and communications technology interventions for stroke survivors and their support people: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(17), 4563–4578. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1913245

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Narbutaitienė, J., Björklund Carlstedt, A., & Fischl, C. (2023). Stroke survivors’ experiences and meaning of digital technology in daily life: A phenomenological study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2174605

Article  PubMed