Comparison of natural versus artificial cycles for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer

WHO Media Team. 1 in 6 people globally affected by infertility. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

Bahamondes L, Makuch MY. Infertility care and the introduction of new reproductive technologies in poor resource settings. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:87. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-87.

Himpunan Endokrinologi Reproduksi dan Fertilitas Indonesia (HIFERI) Perkumpulan Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia (POGI). Konsensus penanganan infertilitas. Cetakan ke-2. Jakarta: Himpunan Endokrinologi Reproduksi dan Fertilitas Indonesia (HIFERI), Perkumpulan Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia (POGI); 2019.

Harzif AK, Santawi VPA, Wijaya S. Discrepancy in perception of infertility and attitude towards treatment options: Indonesian urban and rural area. Reprod Health 2019;16:126. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0792-8.

Indonesian Association for In Vitro Fertilization. IVF data registry. Jakarta: Indonesian Association for In Vitro Fertilization; 2022.

Lathi RB, Chi YY, Liu J, Saravanabavanandhan B, Hegde A, Baker VL. Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer using a supplemented natural cycle protocol has a similar live birth rate compared to a programmed cycle protocol. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015;32:1057-62. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0499-x.

Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update 2019;25:2-14. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy033.

Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20:808-21. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu027.

Shaodi Z, Qiuyuan L, Yisha Y, Cuilian Z. The effect of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles which underwent hormone replacement therapy. PLoS ONE 2020;15: e0239120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239120.

Singh B, Reschke L, Segars J, Baker V. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: the potential importance of the corpus luteum in preventing obstetrical complications. Fertil Steril 2020;113:252-7. doi : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.007.

Groenewoud ER, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ; ANTARCTICA trial study group. Cryo-thawed embryo transfer: natural versus artificial cycle. A non-inferiority trial. BMC Womens Health 2012;12:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-27.

Elsayed MA, Farag MA. Natural cycle versus new artificial protocol in frozen embryo transfer. Int J Adv Res 2015;3:1586-90.

Holder KN, Mormol JS, Bakkensen JB, et al. Natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: evaluating optimal protocols for preparation and timing. J Hum Reprod Sci 2023;16:333-9. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_125_23.

Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Endometrial pattern, thickness and growth in predicting pregnancy outcome following 3319 IVF cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;29:291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.05.011.

Hosseini MA, Hashemi L, Aleyasin A, et al. Natural cycle versus artificial cycle in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a randomized prospective trial. Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2018;15: 12-7. doi: 10.4274/tjod.47855.

Groenewoud ER, Cohlen BJ, Al-Oraiby A, et al. A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of modified natural versus artificial cycle for cryo-thawed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2016;31:1483-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew120.

Levron J, Yerushalmi GM, Brengauz M, Gat I, Katorza E. Comparison between two protocols for thawed embryo transfer: natural cycle versus exogenous hormone replacement. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014;30:494-7. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.900032.

Wu H, Zhou P, Lin X, Wang S, Zhang S. Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Assist Reprod Genet 2021;38:1913-26. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02125-0.

Zheng Y, Dong X, Huang B, Zhang H, Ai J. The artificial cycle method improves the pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2015;31:70-4. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014. 958988.

Mackens S, Santos-Ribeiro S, Vijver AV, et al.. Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing. Hum Reprod 2017;32:2234-42. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex285.

Chen H, Wu S, Su W, Zhao J, Wu Y. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes among patients of different ages who underwent frozen-thawed high-quality single blastocyst transfer. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024;24:276. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06451-w.

Eftekhar M, Rahmani E, Pourmasumi S. Evaluation of clinical factors influencing pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer. Iran J Reprod Med 2014;12:513-8.

Pontré JC, Ryan JP, Tan A, Hart RJ. The interval transfer of a frozen-thawed embryo is more successful than a fresh embryo transfer for women undergoing IVF with recurrent implantation failure after cleavage stage embryo biopsy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019;59:134-9. 10.1111/ajo.12798.

Zaat TR, Kostova EB, Korsen P, Showell MG, Mol F, van Wely M. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after natural versus artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer and the role of luteal phase support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2023;29:634-54. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmad011

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif