Haïssaguerr M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Métayer P, Clémenty J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):659–66.

Article  Google Scholar 

Buist TJ, Adiyaman A, Smit JJJ, RamdatMisier AR, Elvan A. Arrhythmia-free survival and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after second-generation cryoballoon and contact-force radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(6):498–506.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Das M, Wynn GJ, Saeed Y, et al. Pulmonary vein re-isolation as a routine strategy regardless of symptoms. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(6):602–11.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hussein A, Das M, Riva S, et al. Use of ablation index-guided ablation results in high rates of durable pulmonary vein isolation and freedom from arrhythmia in persistent atrial fibrillation patients. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(9):e006576.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iwasawa J, Koruth JS, Petru J, et al. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(5):542–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jefairi NA, Camaioni C, Sridi S, et al. Relationship between atrial scar on cardiac magnetic resonance and pulmonary vein reconnection after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(5):727–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kautzner J, Neuzil P, Lambert H, et al. EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17(8):1229–35.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kuck K-H, Hoffmann BA, Ernst S, et al. Impact of complete versus incomplete circumferential lines around the pulmonary veins during catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ:Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(1):e003337.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Miyazaki S, Taniguchi H, Hachiya H, et al. Quantitative analysis of the isolation area during the chronic phase after a 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon ablation demarcated by high-resolution electroanatomic mapping. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(5):e003879.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neuzil P, Reddy VY, Kautzner J, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(2):327–33.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reddy VY, Sediva L, Petru JAN, et al. Durability of pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon ablation: results from the sustained PV isolation with arctic front advance (SUPIR) study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(5):493–500.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cardoso R, Mendirichaga R, Fernandes G, et al. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(10):1151–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chait J, Kibrik P, Alsheekh A, et al. Radiofrequency ablation increases the incidence of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:263–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tokuda M, Matsuo S, Isogai R, et al. Adenosine testing during cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a propensity score–matched analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(11):2128–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reddy VY, Koruth J, Jais P, et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation with pulsed electric fields. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(8):987–95.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, et al. Pulsed field ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7(5):614–27.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reddy VY, Neuzil P, Koruth JS, et al. Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(3):315–26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ladejobi A, Christopoulos G, Tan N, et al. Effects of pulsed electric fields on the coronary arteries in swine. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022;15(10):e010668.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maor E, Sugrue A, Witt C, et al. Pulsed electric fields for cardiac ablation and beyond: a state-of-the-art review. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(7):1112–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mattison L, Verma A, Tarakji KG, et al. Effect of contact force on pulsed field ablation lesions in porcine cardiac tissue. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023;34(3):693–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neven K, van Driel V, van Wessel H, et al. Safety and feasibility of closed chest epicardial catheter ablation using electroporation. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(5):913–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reinsch N, Füting A, Höwel D, Bell J, Lin Y, Neven K. Cerebral safety after pulsed field ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19(11):1813–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wittkampf FH, Van Driel VJ, Van Wessel H, et al. Feasibility of electroporation for the creation of pulmonary vein ostial lesions. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(3):302–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhu T, Wang Z, Wang S, et al. Pulsed Field ablation of superior vena cava: feasibility and safety of pulsed field ablation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:698716.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Miyazaki S, Taniguchi H, Hachiya H, et al. Clinical recurrence and electrical pulmonary vein reconnections after second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(9):1852–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ikenouchi T, Nitta J, Nitta G, et al. Propensity-matched comparison of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(6):838–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li J-h, Xie H-y, Sun Q, et al. Comparison of using second-generation cryoballoon and radiofrequency catheter for atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with the common ostium of inferior pulmonary veins. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;8:794834.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wei J, Wu WW, et al. The factors to influence verbal pain rating scale of medical students. Jiangsu Med J. 2011;37(12):1406–8.

Google Scholar 

Rahman F, Kwan GF, Benjamin EJ. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(11):639–54.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rahman F, Kwan GF, Benjamin EJ. Erratum: Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13(8):501–501.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhou Z, Hu D. An epidemiological study on the prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the Chinese population of mainland China. J Epidemiol. 2008;18(5):209–16.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rienstra M, Lubitz SA, Mahida S, et al. Symptoms and functional status of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2012;125(23):2933–43.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rienstra M, Vermond RA, Crijns HJGM, Tijssen JGP, Van Gelder IC. Asymptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation and outcome: results of the RACE study. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(6):939–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Della Rocca DG, Marcon L, Magnocavallo M, et al. Pulsed electric field, cryoballoon, and radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a propensity score-matched comparison. Europace. 2024;26(1):euae016.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Aldaas OM, Malladi C, Han FT, et al. Pulsed field ablation versus thermal energy ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of procedural efficiency, safety, and efficacy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023;67(3):639–48.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Reddy VY, Gerstenfeld EP, Natale A, et al. Pulsed field or conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(18):1660–71.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ruwald MH, Johannessen A, Hansen ML, Haugdal M, Worck R, Hansen J. Pulsed field ablation in real-world atrial fibrillation patients: clinical recurrence, operator learning curve and re-do procedural findings. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023;66(8):1837–48.

Article