ROS1 immunohistochemistry as a potential predictive biomarker for ROS1-targeted therapy in breast cancer: impact of antibody clone selection.

Abstract

Aims: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) may show targetable vulnerabilities secondary to the characteristic loss of the cell adhesion protein E-cadherin. Specifically, a synthetic lethal interaction was identified between E-cadherin loss and ROS1 inhibition. Several clinical trials are currently underway to assess the efficacy of ROS1 inhibitors in ILC, however, ROS1 expression has not been confirmed in ILC tumours and ROS1 has not been validated as a biomarker in the breast cancer setting. This study aimed to (i) examine ROS1 expression in a large cohort of breast cancer cases and (ii) investigate the biology and clinical significance of ROS1 positivity in breast cancer. Methods: ROS1 immunohistochemistry was performed on a large cohort of ILC (n=274) and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST; n=431) cases with extensive clinicopathological data. The staining performance of four ROS1 antibody clones was compared. Results: There was marked variation in ROS1 status according to antibody clone. D4D6 and SP384 were negative in almost all breast cancer cases, whereas EP282 and EPMGHR2 were positive in 37% and 47% of ILC cases, and 49% and 74% of NST cases, respectively. Only data from clones D4D6 and SP384 were highly concordant, while EP282 and EPMGHR2 were positive in distinct breast cancer subtypes. Conclusions: Assessment of ROS1 status in breast cancer appears to be highly antibody clone dependent. ROS1 antibody clone selection will be an important consideration in the design of clinical trials investigating the clinical validity of ROS1 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Anna Sokolova received fellowship support from Breast Cancer Trials.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committees of The University of Queensland (2005000785) gave ethical approval for this work. Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital (RBWH 2005/022) gave ethical approval for this work. UnitingCare Health (2006-39) gave ethical approval for this work. Public Health Act from the Queensland Government (CT_4352) gave approval for this study.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif