Development and clinical application of a methylated ctDNA assay in the preoperative risk classification of resectable colon cancer

Abstract

Background Pathological lymph node involvement (pN+) is an indicator of poor prognosis in localized colon cancer. Currently, the preoperative risk classification fails to accurately identify pN+, which could be instrumental in the selection of patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study aimed to develop an assay for preoperative methylated circulating tumor DNA (meth-ctDNA) as a predictive marker of pN+ and as a biomarker for initiating NAC in patients with localized colon cancer. Materials and methods 203 patients operated for colon cancer stage I-III at Vejle Hospital were randomly assigned (1:1) to a discovery and a validation cohort. A multiplex assay of a tumor-specific (NPY) and two organ-specific (GAL3ST3, KANK1) meth-ctDNAs was designed and methylation analysis was performed using droplet digital PCR. The ability of preoperative meth-ctDNA to predict pN+ was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Results ROC analyses of meth-ctDNA (negative/positive) to predict pN+ had an area under the curve of 52% and 57% in the discovery and validation cohort, respectively. Survival analysis in the validation cohort confirmed a higher rate of 48 months disease-free survival in meth-ctDNA negative compared to positive patients (HR=2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.2). The difference also applied to 4-year overall survival (HR=3.62, 95% CI 1.15-11.4). In a multivariate analysis, meth-ctDNA remained the strongest prognostic factor of DFS (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.03-5.88) and OS (HR 4.54, 95% CI 1.32-15.6) in relation to clinical T- or N-category, gender and age. Conclusion The preoperative meth-ctDNA multiplex assay did not predict pN+. The findings suggest meth-ctDNA as a more powerful marker than N-category in identifying high-risk patients who would potentially benefit from NAC.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The study received funding from The Moltum Foundation, The Groenbeck-Olsen Foundation and The Hoejmosegaard Foundation. The study was financially supported by the Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark gave ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif
Back To Top