Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most frequent cancers and a leading contributor to cancer-associated mortality globally. CRCs are often diagnosed at an advanced stage, which leads to high mortality and morbidity. This outcome is exacerbated by high rates of recurrence and postoperative complications that contribute substantially to poor prognosis. Advancements in endoscopic assessment have improved CRC prevention, early detection, and surveillance over the years. Yet, CRC remains one of the most significant health challenges of the 21st century. Label-free optical spectroscopy methods have long been explored as potential partners to endoscopy, not only to enhance diagnostic accuracy but also to confer predictive capabilities to endoscopic evaluations. In this study, we investigated the potential of time-resolved autofluorescence measurements excited at 375 nm and 445 nm to correctly classify benign and malignant tissues in CRC surgical specimens from 117 patients. Multiparametric autofluorescence lifetime data were collected in two distinct datasets, which were used for training (n = 73) and testing (n = 44) a supervised classification model, with standard histopathology assessment serving as ground truth. Using 5-fold cross-validation, we achieved 82.6 +- 0.02% sensitivity, 90.4 +- 0.01% specificity, 87.4 +- 0.01% accuracy, and 0.941 +- 0.004 area under the curve (AUC) for training data. Evaluation on unseen test data yielded similar results, with 85.2% sensitivity, 84.5% specificity, 84.8% accuracy, and 0.915 AUC. While preliminary, our findings underscore the potential impact of AI-assisted autofluorescence lifetime measurements in advancing CRC prevention, early detection, and surveillance efforts.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementAlberto I. Herrando was supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant 857894 (CAST). Vladislav Shcheslavskiy was supported by RSF 23-15-00294.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of Champalimaud Foundation gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityThe dataset underlying this work is not publicly available at the time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.
留言 (0)