Alashram AR, Annino G, Padua E. Robot-assisted gait training in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review for the clinical effectiveness of Lokomat. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;91:260–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fabbri I, Betti F, Tedeschi R. Gait quality after robot therapy compared with physiotherapy in the patient with incomplete spinal cord injured: a systematic review. eNeurologicalSci. 2023;31: 100467.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tamburella F, Lorusso M, Tramontano M, Fadlun S, Masciullo M, Scivoletto G. Overground robotic training effects on walking and secondary health conditions in individuals with spinal cord injury: systematic review. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2022;19:27.
Zhang L, Lin F, Sun L, Chen C. Comparison of efficacy of lokomat and wearable exoskeleton-assisted gait training in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.772660/full.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lorusso M, Tramontano M, Casciello M, Pece A, Smania N, Morone G, et al. Efficacy of overground robotic gait training on balance in stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Sci. 2022;12:713.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van Dellen F, Labruyère R. Settings matter: a scoping review on parameters in robot-assisted gait therapy identifies the importance of reporting standards. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19:40.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gimigliano F, Palomba A, Arienti C, Morone G, Perrero L, Agostini M, et al. Robot-assisted arm therapy in neurological health conditions: rationale and methodology for the evidence synthesis in the CICERONE Italian Consensus Conference. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;57:824–30.
Wu L, Xu G, Wu Q. The effect of the Lokomat® robotic-orthosis system on lower extremity rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1260652.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Calabrò RS, Cassio A, Mazzoli D, Andrenelli E, Bizzarini E, Campanini I, et al. What does evidence tell us about the use of gait robotic devices in patients with multiple sclerosis? A comprehensive systematic review on functional outcomes and clinical recommendations. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;57:841–9.
Nam KY, Kim HJ, Kwon BS, Park J-W, Lee HJ, Yoo A. Robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) improves walking function and activity in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:24.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Belda-Lois J-M, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, Moreno JC, Pons JL, Farina D, et al. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011;8:66.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Colombo G, Wirz M, Dietz V. Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients. Spinal Cord. 2001;39:252–5.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Jayaraman A. Powered exoskeletons for walking assistance in persons with central nervous system injuries: a narrative review. PM&R. 2017;9:46–62.
Colombo G. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:693–700.
Lunenburger L, Colombo G, Riener R, Dietz V. Biofeedback in gait training with the robotic orthosis Lokomat. The 26th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE; 2004. p. 4888–91. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1404352/. Accessed 20 Feb 2024.
Tamburella F, Moreno JC, Herrera Valenzuela DS, Pisotta I, Iosa M, Cincotti F, et al. Influences of the biofeedback content on robotic post-stroke gait rehabilitation: electromyographic vs joint torque biofeedback. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2019;16:95.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tamburella F, Moreno JC, Iosa M, Pisotta I, Cincotti F, Mattia D, et al. Boosting the traditional physiotherapist approach for stroke spasticity using a sensorized ankle foot orthosis: a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24:447–56.
Morone G, Ghanbari Ghooshchy S, Palomba A, Baricich A, Santamato A, Ciritella C, et al. Differentiation among bio- and augmented- feedback in technologically assisted rehabilitation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021;18:513–22.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lindberg J, Kreuter M, Person L-O, Taft C. Patient Participation in Rehabilitation Questionnaire (PPRQ)-development and psychometric evaluation. Spinal Cord. 2013;51:838–42.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Paolucci S, Di Vita A, Massicci R, Traballesi M, Bureca I, Matano A, et al. Impact of participation on rehabilitation results: a multivariate study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48:455–66.
Cole MB, McLean V. Therapeutic relationships re-defined. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2003;19:33–56.
Pisotta I, Tagliamonte NL, Bigioni A, Tamburella F, Lorusso M, Bentivoglio F, et al. Pilot testing of a new questionnaire for the assessment of user experience during exoskeleton-assisted walking. In: Torricelli D, Akay M, Pons JL, editors., et al., Converging clinical and engineering research on neurorehabilitation IV. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 195–9.
Prideaux N, van den Berg M, Drummond C, Barr C. Augmented performance feedback during robotic gait therapy results in moderate intensity cardiovascular exercise in subacute stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29: 104758.
Zimmerli L, Duschau-Wicke A, Mayr A, Riener R, Lunenburger L. Virtual reality and gait rehabilitation Augmented feedback for the Lokomat. In: 2009 virtual rehabilitation international conference. 2009. p. 150–3. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5174223. Accessed 19 July 2024.
Banz R, Bolliger M, Colombo G, Dietz V, Lünenburger L. Computerized visual feedback: an adjunct to robotic-assisted gait training. Phys Ther. 2008;88:1135–45.
Singh H, Singh DJ. Human eye tracking and related issues: a review. Int J Sci Res Publ. 2012;2:1–9.
Just MA, Carpenter PA. A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychol Rev. 1980;87:329–54.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schomer DL, da Silva FHL. Niedermeyer’s electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
Cui F, Ma N, Luo Y-J. Moral judgment modulates neural responses to the perception of other’s pain: an ERP study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20851.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pisanu E, Arbula S, Rumiati RI. Agreeableness modulates mental state decoding: electrophysiological evidence. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024;45: e26593.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Horat SK, Prévot A, Richiardi J, Herrmann FR, Favre G, Merlo MCG, et al. Differences in social decision-making between proposers and responders during the ultimatum game: an EEG study. Front Integr Neurosci. 2017;11:13.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sánchez-García J, Espuny J, Hernández-Gutiérrez D, Casado P, Muñoz F, Jiménez-Ortega L, et al. Neurofunctional characterization of early prefrontal processes contributing to interpersonal guilt. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019;19:1192–202.
Schindler S, Miller GA, Kissler J. Attending to Eliza: rapid brain responses reflect competence attribution in virtual social feedback processing. Social Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019;14:1073–86.
Anzolin A, Isenburg K, Grahl A, Toppi J, Yucel M, Ellingsen DM, et al. Patient-clinician brain response during clinical encounter and pain treatment. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020;2020:1512–5.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Burra N, Kerzel D, George N. Early left parietal activity elicited by direct gaze: a high-density EEG study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0166430.
留言 (0)