Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al (1991) Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med 324(19):1370–1371. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199105093241917
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA et al (2018) Laparoscopic and robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review. BJU Int 121(6):845–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14062
Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R et al (2010) Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 57(2):196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.024
García-Galisteo E, Emmanuel-Tejero E, Navarro Vílchez P et al (2011) Comparison of the operation time and complications between conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Actas Urol Esp 35(9):523–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2011.04.011
Wang J, Fan S, Shen C et al (2022) Partial nephrectomy through retroperitoneal approach with a new surgical robot system, KD-SR-01. Int J Med Robot 18(2):e2352. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2352
Fan S, Dai X, Yang K et al (2021) Robot-assisted pyeloplasty using a new robotic system, the KangDuo-Surgical Robot-01: a prospective, single-centre, single-arm clinical study. BJU Int 128(2):162–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15396
Fan S, Zhang Z, Wang J et al (2022) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the KangDuo surgical robot-01 system: a prospective, single-center, single-arm clinical study. J Urol 208(1):119–127. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002498
Dai X, Fan S, Hao H et al (2021) Comparison of KD-SR-01 robotic partial nephrectomy and 3D-laparoscopic partial nephrectomy from an operative and ergonomic perspective: a prospective randomized controlled study in porcine models. Int J Med Robot 17(2):e2187. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2187
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J et al (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53(11):1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Terrin N et al (2006) The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ 333(7568):597–600. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fan S, Xiong S, Li Z et al (2022) Pyeloplasty with the Kangduo surgical robot vs the da Vinci Si robotic system: preliminary results. J Endourol 36(12):1538–1544. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0366
Fan S, Hao H, Chen S et al (2023) Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using the KangDuo surgical robot system vs the da Vinci Si robotic system. J Endourol 37(5):568–574. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0739
Shen C, Yan W, Chen S et al (2024) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the KangDuo surgical system versus the da vinci si system: a prospective, double-center, randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.023
Li X, Xu W, Fan S et al (2023) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with the newly developed KangDuo surgical robot versus the da Vinci Si surgical system: a double-center prospective randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Eur Urol Focus 9(1):133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.07.008
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang Z, Li Z, Xu W et al (2024) Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy using the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 System versus the da Vinci System: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial
Wottawa CR, Genovese B, Nowroozi BN et al (2016) Evaluating tactile feedback in robotic surgery for potential clinical application using an animal model. Surg Endosc 30(8):3198–3209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4602-2
留言 (0)