Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26.
Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Digesu A, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):165–94.
Iglesia CB, Smithling KR. Pelvic organ prolapse. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(3):179–85.
Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q)—a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life. 2011;4(1):75–81.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
De Tayrac R, Antosh DD, Baessler K, Cheon C, Deffieux X, Gutman R, et al. Summary: 2021 International consultation on incontinence evidence-based surgical pathway for pelvic organ prolapse. J Clin Med. 2022;11(20):6106.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1467–70; discussion 1470–1.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Baden WF, Walker T. Surgical repair of vaginal defects. Illustrated, Lippincott, 1992.
Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2):372–7; discussion 337–9.
Maluenda A, Santis-Moya F, Arévalo D, Pohlhammer D, Blumel B, Guzmán-Rojas R, et al. Levator ani avulsion in ultrasound increases recurrence in sacrospinous fixation. Urogynecology. 2024;30(5):505–10.
Guan Y, Zhang K, Han J, Yao Y, Wang Y, Yang J. Midterm comparison of laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of moderate to severe apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(10):2501–6.
Van Oudheusden AMJ, van Ijsselmuiden MN, Menge LF, Coolen ALWM, Veen J, van Eijndhoven HWF, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomised controlled trial and prospective cohort (SALTO-2 trial). BJOG. 2023;130(12):1542–51.
Van Oudheusden AMJ, Eissing J, Terink IM, Vink MDH, van Kuijk SMJ, Bongers MY, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):93–104.
Van Oudheusden AMJ, Coolen A-LWM, Hoskam H, Veen J, Bongers MY. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):211–23.
Horcicka L, Krcmar M, Nemec M, Hympanova L, Feyereisl J, Krofta L. Appearance of levator ani muscle subdivision defects on level III vaginal support structures in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: an MRI study. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(8):1971–82.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zargham M, Dehghani M, Gholipour F, Emami M, Daneshvari M, Aminsharifi A. Triple-compartment strategy for abdominal sacral colpopexy using PVDF mesh: one-year report of anatomical and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(8):1907–14.
Ketenci Gencer F, Salman S, Kumbasar S, Bacak HB, Khatib O, Kaya C, et al. Lateral suspension with V-NOTES for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Salman-Ketenci Gencer technique. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(7):1583–91.
Gopinath D, Yong C, Harding-Forrester S, McIntyre F, McKenzie D, Carey M. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):105–13.
Wu C, Zhang Z, He H, Zhou Z, Li H, Tong X. Six-year follow-up outcomes of the P(LLA-CL)/Fg bio-patch for anterior vaginal wall prolapse treatment. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):115–24.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Isenlik BS, Aksoy O, Erol O, Mulayim B. Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):231–8.
Wang R, Tunitsky-Bitton E. How does office assessment of prolapse compare to what is seen in the operating room? Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):167–74.
Tuuli MG, Gregory WT, Arya LA, Lowder JL, Woolfolk C, Caughey AB, et al. Effect of second-stage pushing timing on postpartum pelvic floor morbidity: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2023;141(2):245–52.
Vereeck S, Pacquée S, De Wachter S, Jacquemyn Y, Neels H, Dietz HP. The effect of prolapse surgery on voiding function. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(9):2141–6.
Napoe GS, Luchristt D, Sridhar A, Ellington D, Ridgeway B, Mazloomdoost D, et al. Reoperation for prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous mesh hysteropexy: characteristics of women choosing retreatment. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):255–61.
Chan JCY, Yu CH, Go WW. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):271–8.
Padoa A, Levy E, Fligelman T, Tomashev-Dinkovich R, Tsviban A, Serati M. Predictors of persistent overactive bladder following surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(3):759–67.
Pacquée S, Dietz HP. Clinical assessment of pelvic organ prolapse by consecutive cough maneuver. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):185–90.
Ghanbari Z, Peivandi S, Pasikhani MD, Darabi F. Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in clinical staging of Iranian women with pelvic organ prolapse. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020;30(6):921–8.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Riss P, Dwyer PL. The POP-Q classification system: looking back and looking forward. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):439–40.
Boyd SS, O’Sullivan D, Tulikangas P. Use of the Pelvic Organ Quantification System (POP-Q) in published articles of peer-reviewed journals. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1719–23.
Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S. Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004;15(5):324–7.
Pham T, Burgart A, Kenton K, Mueller ER, Brubaker L. Current Use of pelvic organ prolapse quantification by AUGS and ICS members. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011;17(2):67–9.
Madhu C, Swift S, Moloney-Geany S, Drake MJ. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system? Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(S6):S39–43.
留言 (0)