Erroneous and Incomplete Reporting of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System

Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):5–26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Digesu A, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):165–94.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iglesia CB, Smithling KR. Pelvic organ prolapse. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(3):179–85.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q)—a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life. 2011;4(1):75–81.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Tayrac R, Antosh DD, Baessler K, Cheon C, Deffieux X, Gutman R, et al. Summary: 2021 International consultation on incontinence evidence-based surgical pathway for pelvic organ prolapse. J Clin Med. 2022;11(20):6106.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1467–70; discussion 1470–1.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baden WF, Walker T. Surgical repair of vaginal defects. Illustrated, Lippincott, 1992.

Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2):372–7; discussion 337–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maluenda A, Santis-Moya F, Arévalo D, Pohlhammer D, Blumel B, Guzmán-Rojas R, et al. Levator ani avulsion in ultrasound increases recurrence in sacrospinous fixation. Urogynecology. 2024;30(5):505–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guan Y, Zhang K, Han J, Yao Y, Wang Y, Yang J. Midterm comparison of laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of moderate to severe apical prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(10):2501–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Oudheusden AMJ, van Ijsselmuiden MN, Menge LF, Coolen ALWM, Veen J, van Eijndhoven HWF, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomised controlled trial and prospective cohort (SALTO-2 trial). BJOG. 2023;130(12):1542–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Oudheusden AMJ, Eissing J, Terink IM, Vink MDH, van Kuijk SMJ, Bongers MY, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):93–104.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Oudheusden AMJ, Coolen A-LWM, Hoskam H, Veen J, Bongers MY. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):211–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Horcicka L, Krcmar M, Nemec M, Hympanova L, Feyereisl J, Krofta L. Appearance of levator ani muscle subdivision defects on level III vaginal support structures in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: an MRI study. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(8):1971–82.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zargham M, Dehghani M, Gholipour F, Emami M, Daneshvari M, Aminsharifi A. Triple-compartment strategy for abdominal sacral colpopexy using PVDF mesh: one-year report of anatomical and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(8):1907–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ketenci Gencer F, Salman S, Kumbasar S, Bacak HB, Khatib O, Kaya C, et al. Lateral suspension with V-NOTES for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Salman-Ketenci Gencer technique. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(7):1583–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gopinath D, Yong C, Harding-Forrester S, McIntyre F, McKenzie D, Carey M. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):105–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu C, Zhang Z, He H, Zhou Z, Li H, Tong X. Six-year follow-up outcomes of the P(LLA-CL)/Fg bio-patch for anterior vaginal wall prolapse treatment. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):115–24.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Isenlik BS, Aksoy O, Erol O, Mulayim B. Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):231–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang R, Tunitsky-Bitton E. How does office assessment of prolapse compare to what is seen in the operating room? Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):167–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tuuli MG, Gregory WT, Arya LA, Lowder JL, Woolfolk C, Caughey AB, et al. Effect of second-stage pushing timing on postpartum pelvic floor morbidity: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2023;141(2):245–52.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vereeck S, Pacquée S, De Wachter S, Jacquemyn Y, Neels H, Dietz HP. The effect of prolapse surgery on voiding function. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(9):2141–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Napoe GS, Luchristt D, Sridhar A, Ellington D, Ridgeway B, Mazloomdoost D, et al. Reoperation for prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous mesh hysteropexy: characteristics of women choosing retreatment. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):255–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chan JCY, Yu CH, Go WW. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):271–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Padoa A, Levy E, Fligelman T, Tomashev-Dinkovich R, Tsviban A, Serati M. Predictors of persistent overactive bladder following surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(3):759–67.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pacquée S, Dietz HP. Clinical assessment of pelvic organ prolapse by consecutive cough maneuver. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):185–90.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ghanbari Z, Peivandi S, Pasikhani MD, Darabi F. Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in clinical staging of Iranian women with pelvic organ prolapse. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020;30(6):921–8.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Riss P, Dwyer PL. The POP-Q classification system: looking back and looking forward. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):439–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boyd SS, O’Sullivan D, Tulikangas P. Use of the Pelvic Organ Quantification System (POP-Q) in published articles of peer-reviewed journals. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1719–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S. Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004;15(5):324–7.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pham T, Burgart A, Kenton K, Mueller ER, Brubaker L. Current Use of pelvic organ prolapse quantification by AUGS and ICS members. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011;17(2):67–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Madhu C, Swift S, Moloney-Geany S, Drake MJ. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system? Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(S6):S39–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif