The influence of preformed metal crowns versus zirconia crowns on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pediatric restorative dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34(5):173–80.

Google Scholar 

Beau A, Bossard D, Gebeile-Chauty S. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(1):105–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju020.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bohner L, Hanisch M, Sesma N, Blanck-Lubarsch M, Kleinheinz J. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental materials: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022;51(6):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210450.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bryll A, Urbanik A, Chrzan R, Jurczak A, Kwapińska H, Sobiecka B. MRI disturbances caused by dental materials. Neuroradiol J. 2007;20(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/197140090702000101.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cassetta M, Pranno N, Stasolla A, Orsogna N, Fierro D, Cavallini C, Cantisani V. The effects of a common stainless steel orthodontic bracket on the diagnostic quality of cranial and cervical 3T- MR images: a prospective, case-control study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(6):20170051–20170051. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170051.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chockattu S, Suryakant D, Thakur S. Unwanted effects due to interactions between dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging: a review of the literature. Restor Dent Endod. 2018;43(4):1–20. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e39.

Article  Google Scholar 

Costa A, Appenzeller S, Yasuda C, Pereira F, Zanardi V, Cendes F. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14(6):E278–82.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dagia C, Ditchfield M. 3T MRI in paediatrics: challenges and clinical applications. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68(2):309–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.05.019.

Article  Google Scholar 

Duttenhoefer F, Mertens M, Vizkelety J, Gremse F, Stadelmann V, Sauerbier S. Magnetic resonance imaging in zirconia-based dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(10):1195–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12430.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elison M, Leggitt L, Thomson M, Oyoyo U, Wycliffe D. Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(4):563–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.038.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gao X, Wan Q, Gao Q. Susceptibility artifacts induced by crowns of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants in magnetic resonance imaging. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03962-w.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Graves M, Mitchell D. Body MRI artifacts in clinical practice: a physicist’s and radiologist’s perspective. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(2):269–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24288.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guermazi A, Miaux Y, Zaim S, Peterfy C, White D, Genant H. Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength. Clin Radiol. 2003;58(4):322–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-9260(02)00540-8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hargreaves B, Worters P, Pauly K, Pauly J, Koch K, Gold G. Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(3):547–55. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7364.

Article  Google Scholar 

Harris T, Faridrad M, Dickson J. The benefits of aesthetic orthodontic brackets in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning. J Orthodont. 2006;33(2):90–4. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531205225021465.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Heinrich A, Teichgräber U, Güttler F. Measurement of susceptibility artifacts with histogram-based reference value on magnetic resonance images according to standard ASTM F2119. Biomed Eng. 2015;60(6):541–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2014-0184.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kajima Y, Takaichi A, Tsutsumi Y, Hanawa T, Wakabayashi N, Kawasaki A. Influence of magnetic susceptibility and volume on mri MRI artifacts produced by low magnetic susceptibility Zr-14nb alloy and dental alloys. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(2):256–61. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-426.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kawabata I, Imai H, Kanno Z, Tetsumura A, Tsutsumi Y, Doi H, Ashida M, Kurabayashi T, Hanawa T, Yamamoto T, Ono T. Three-dimensional quantification of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts associated with shape factors. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(4):638–45. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-197.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Klinke T, Daboul A, Maron J, Gredes T, Puls R, Jaghsi A, Biffar R. Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography caused by dental materials. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2): e31766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031766.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lissac M, Metrop D, Brugirard J, Coudert J, Pimmel P, Briguet A, Revel D, Amiel M. Dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 1991;26(1):40–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199101000-00008.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lloyd C, McHugh K. The role of radiology in head and neck tumours in children. Cancer Imaging. 2010;10(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2010.0003.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mathew C, Maller S. Interactions between magnetic resonance imaging and dental material. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S113–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.113309.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ozawa E, Honda E, Parakonthun K, Ohmori H, Shimazaki K, Kurabayashi T, Ono T. Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies. Prog Orthod. 2018;19(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0204-6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Seale S, Randall R. The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37(2):145–60.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sonesson M, Al-Qabandi F, Månsson S, Abdulraheem S, Bondemark L, Hellén-Halme K. Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: an exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners. Imaging Sci Dent. 2021;51(1):63–63. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20200199.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sumner O, Goldsmith R, Heath N, Taylor G. The interaction and interference of preformed metal crowns on magnetic resonance imaging: a scoping review with a systematic methodology. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00644-z.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tymofiyeva O, Vaegler S, Rottner K, Boldt J, Hopfgartner A, Proff P, Richter E, Jakob P. Influence of dental materials on dental MRI. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(6):20120271–20120271. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20120271.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wylezinska M, Pinkstone M, Hay N, Scott A, Birch M, Miquel M. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(6):610–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju103.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yisheng X, Risheng Y. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts of five common dental materials. WCJS. 2015;33(3):230–3. https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2015.03.003.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhylich D, Krishnan P, Muthusami P, Rayner T, Shroff M, Doria A, Tompson B, Lou W, Suri S. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images of the head. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151(3):484–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.020.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif