Martin-Rhee MM, Bialystok E (2008) The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Biling Lang Cogn 11(1):81–93

Article  Google Scholar 

Rönnberg J et al (2022) The cognitive hearing science perspective on perceiving, understanding, and remembering language: the ELU model. Front Psychol 13:967260

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Krizman J et al (2017) How bilinguals listen in noise: linguistic and non-linguistic factors. Biling Lang Cogn 20(4):34–843

Article  Google Scholar 

Kraus N, White-Schwoch T (2017) The bilingualism paradox. Hear J 70(1):40–42

Article  Google Scholar 

Āzād Fallāh P (2014) Rasoul Zādeye Tabātabāyi, Assessment and comparison of creative thinking in monolingual and early equal bilingual children. Educational Innovations 13(1):92–107

Google Scholar 

Shook A et al (2015) Bilinguals show weaker lexical access during spoken sentence comprehension. J Psycholinguist Res 44(6):789–802

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bsharat-Maalouf D, Karawani H (2022) Learning and bilingualism in challenging listening conditions: how challenging can it be? Cognition 222:105018

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baker C (2011) Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Multilingual matters

Hugdahl K et al (2003) The effects of attention on speech perception: an fMRI study. Brain Lang 85(1):37–48

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chupani J, Javanbakht M, Lotfi Y (2021) Central auditory processing in bilinguals. Auditory Vestib Res 30(3):60–166

Google Scholar 

Bosman AM, Janssen M (2017) Differential relationships between language skills and working memory in Turkish–Dutch and native-dutch first-graders from low-income families. Read Writ 30(9):1945–1964

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

MacCutcheon D et al (2018) The effect of language, spatial factors, masker type and memory span on speech-in‐noise thresholds in sequential bilingual children. Scand J Psychol 59(6):567–577

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rönnberg J et al (2008) Cognition counts: a working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). Int J Audiol 47(sup2):S99–S105

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Warrier CM et al (2004) Learning impaired children exhibit timing deficits and training-related improvements in auditory cortical responses to speech in noise. Exp Brain Res 157:431–441

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baumann O, Belin P (2010) Perceptual scaling of voice identity: common dimensions for different vowels and speakers. Psychol Res PRPF 74(1):10–120

Google Scholar 

Masure M-C, Samson Y, by, Belin P, Zilbovicius M (1998) Sophie Crozier, Lionel Thivard, Anne Fontaine. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(4): 5

Strait DL et al (2013) Biological impact of preschool music classes on processing speech in noise. Dev Cogn Neurosci 6:51–60

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kilman L et al (2014) The influence of non-native language proficiency on speech perception performance. Front Psychol 5:651

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schellenberg EG (2005) Music and cognitive abilities. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14(6):317–320

Article  Google Scholar 

Arbab H et al (2016) Development and psychometric evaluation of Persian version of the quick speech in noise test in Persian speaking 18–25 years old normal adults. J Rehabilitation Sci Res 3(3):51–56

Google Scholar 

Schmiedek F, Lövdén M, Lindenberger U (2014) A task is a task is a task: putting complex span, n-back, and other working memory indicators in psychometric context. Front Psychol 5:1475

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jafari Z et al (2013) Constructing Persian version of the Bergen dichotic listening test and its preliminary results in normal adults, vol 22. Bimonthly Audiology-Tehran University of Medical Sciences, pp 31–41. 3

Lotfi Y et al (2019) Evaluation of speech perception in noise in Kurd-Persian bilinguals. Auditory Vestib Res 28(1):36–41

Google Scholar 

Calais LL, Russo ICP (2008).d.C. Borges, performance of elderly in a speech in noise test. Pró-Fono Revista De Atualização Científica 20:147–152

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmidt H et al (2009) No gender differences in brain activation during the N-back task: an fMRI study in healthy individuals. Hum Brain Mapp 30(11):3609–3615

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lucks Mendel L, Widner H (2016) Speech perception in noise for bilingual listeners with normal hearing. Int J Audiol 55(2):126–134

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tabri D, Chacra KMSA, Pring T (2015) Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners. Int J Lang Communication Disorders,: 1–12

Soleymani M et al (2015) The effects of bilingualism on auditory memory using Persian version of dichotic auditory-verbal memory test

Krizman J et al (2012) Subcortical encoding of sound is enhanced in bilinguals and relates to executive function advantages. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(20):7877–7881

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bak TH, Vega-Mendoza M, Sorace A (2014) Never too late? An advantage on tests of auditory attention extends to late bilinguals. Front Psychol 5:485

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Phelps J, Attaheri A, Bozic M (2022) How bilingualism modulates selective attention in children. Sci Rep 12(1):6381

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shokuhifar G et al (2024) The relationship between speech in noise perception and auditory working memory capacity in monolingual and bilingual adults. Int J Audiol,: 1–8

Lotfi Y et al (2019) Speech-ABR in contralateral noise: a potential tool to evaluate rostral part of the auditory efferent system. Med Hypotheses 132:109355

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Magimairaj BM, Nagaraj NK, Benafield NJ (2018) Children’s speech perception in noise: evidence for dissociation from language and working memory. J Speech Lang Hear Res 61(5):1294–1305

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stenbäck V, Hällgren M, Larsby B (2016) Executive functions and working memory capacity in speech communication under adverse conditions. Speech Lang Hear 19(4):218–226

Article  Google Scholar