Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) affects many adults over the age of 50. Part of its incidence in the population is attributed to work and exposure to risk factors such as silica dust, and anticipating the diagnosis can prevent its worsening. This study aims to identify patients at higher risk of having a positive COPD diagnosis using variables routinely collected in primary care. A total of 120,294 participants from the UK Biobank database, recruited between 2006 and 2010, were analyzed. Of these, 1,837 (1.5%) had a positive COPD diagnosis. A total of 20 variables, including demographic data, laboratory tests, habits, and symptoms, were selected to build predictive models of COPD using five machine learning algo- rithms (artificial neural networks, extra trees, random forests, catboost, and extreme gradient boosting). Additionally, a subset of 7,628 participants with a history in the construction and mining industries was selected to train a specialized model. Among them, 248 (3.25%) had a positive diagnosis. Data were randomly divided, with 70% allocated for training the models and 30% for performance testing. Both models showed good predictive performance. The general model achieved an AUC of 0.847, sensitivity of 0.786, and specificity of 0.765. In the specialist model, an AUC of 0.830, sensitivity of 0.773, and specificity of 0.773 were obtained. The five main predictive variables were chronic cough, age, history of asthma, sputum production, and tobacco exposure. The results demonstrate that it is possible to predict the individual risk of COPD diagnosis using variables commonly collected in primary care
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
留言 (0)