Opioid Overdose and Naloxone Administration Knowledge and Perceived Competency in A Probability Sample of Indiana Urban Communities with Large Black Populations

Abstract

Background: Despite widespread naloxone distribution efforts, opioid-involved overdose rates remain high, with rates in recent years indicating disproportionate increases in the death rate for Black residents. This study evaluated knowledge and perceived competency regarding opioid overdose and naloxone administration among urban Indiana residents. Methods: As part of a federally funded project (#CPIMP221346), the Indiana University Center for Survey Research conducted community probability surveys from March to May 2023, sampling 772 residents in Indiana's urban communities across 8 zip code areas. The study explored individual and community level factors affecting residents' knowledge and perceived competency regarding opioid overdose and naloxone administration. Results: Multilevel analysis identified race, sex, household income, education, length of time lived in community, and a history of opioid overdose as significant predictors of knowledge. Participants who identified as White scored a mean of 6.65 out of 10, those of Other races scored 5.75, and Black participants scored 5.70, on a 10 item questionnaire developed from the Overdose Knowledge Scale (OOKS) and the Opioid Overdose Attitudes Scale (OOAS) (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was significant cross-level interaction between race and poverty, such that Black residents living in poorer neighborhoods displayed lower knowledge scores than White counterparts (ꞵ = 1.06, p = 0.039). However, in terms of perceived competency, only age and a history of opioid overdose, were found to be significant predictors. Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of community education to increase knowledge and perceived competency regarding opioid overdose and naloxone administration among Black populations particularly living in socioeconomically disadvantated areas.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This project was supported by the Office of Minority Health (OMH) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of a financial assistance award (CPIMP221346). The contents are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by OMH/OASH/HHS, or the U.S. Government. For more information, please visit https://www.minorityhealth.hhs.gov/.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board (IUIRB), which determined that the research met the requirements for federal and University criteria for exemption (approved protocol ID: 16953). Informed consent was obtained for all participants. Waiver of documentation of consent was approved by the IUIRB.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are not available due to personally identifiable information of study participants who were recruited from relatively small geographic areas (8 zip code areas) and sensitive data (e.g., illicit drug use).

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif