In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a prevalent and rapidly progressive condition with a high mortality rate, reaching up to 70%. Despite its fatalness, IHCA has received limited attention compared to other high-risk cardiovascular diseases like myocardial infarction and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (Richardson et al., 2021; Andersen et al., 2019; Schluep et al., 2018). Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), which involves the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), offers hemodynamic support to maintain vital organ perfusion in the presence of persistent cardiovascular impairment, potentially improving survival after IHCA (Richardson et al., 2021; Vakil et al., 2021). Patients with IHCA often experience severe hypoxemia or face constant risks of aspiration due to their inability to clear upper airway secretions and gastric reflux independently. Rapid tracheal intubation becomes essential for minimizing low flow duration during ECPR implementation (Ryu et al., 2015). However, achieving both prompt intubation and impeccable asepsis can be challenging when urgently performing ECPR on IHCA patients. Furthermore, these patients frequently require continuous ventilator-assisted ventilation, indwelling veno-arterial ECMO (VA ECMO) catheters, and sometimes continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) tubes and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) tubes-all contributing as risk factors for infection development (Raad et al., 2007). A proportion of patients die from infectious shock secondary to IHCA.
In addition, ECMO is associated with the up-regulation of inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines, endotoxins, and oxygen-derived free radicals, and even contributes to the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (François et al., 2019; Millar et al., 2016; Mongardon et al., 2011; Perbet et al., 2011; Shiba et al., 2020). Recent studies have demonstrated that levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), a crucial inflammatory factor, are correlated with early-onset pneumonia (EOP) in ECPR patients (Shiba et al., 2020). In the early stage of EOP, patients may present with elevated levels of white blood cells, CRP, fever, etc. However, prompt administration of antibiotics can potentially obscure the true pathogen and mask the positive rate of traditional pathogen tests such as blood culture. Consequently, achieving an accurate etiological diagnosis becomes a challenging task (François et al., 2019). In patients undergoing ECPR for IHCA, there is a significantly increased risk of infection necessitating prompt identification of the pathogen and initiation of antibiotic treatment.
In recent years, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has garnered significant attention in the field of infectious diseases due to its high throughput capacity and rapid turnaround time (Mitchell and Simner, 2019; Wu et al., 2020; Xie et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2019), substantially reducing clinical diagnosis time. Several studies have highlighted that mNGS testing can identify antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes and assist clinicians in adjusting antibiotic treatment regimens (Deurenberg et al., 2017; Lefterova et al., 2015). Moreover, the diagnostic accuracy of mNGS remains unaffected by antibiotic use (Grumaz et al., 2019). The feasibility of mNGS in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), blood, sputum, transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB), and even lung tissue biopsy for patients with respiratory tract infections has been well-documented in the literature (Chen et al., 2020; Li et al., 2018, Li et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2020). However, the utilization of mNGS testing in patients undergoing ECPR remains relatively infrequent, with limited research available and a lack of knowledge regarding its impact on the incidence of EOP and mortality rates among ECPR patients.
This study aims to encompass patients undergoing ECPR for IHCA, analyze their baseline characteristics, evaluate the impact of early mNGS testing on the incidence of EOP and short-term prognosis in such patients, investigate the causative organisms involved, and provide guidance for precise antibiotic utilization in clinical practice.
2 Materials and methods2.1 Research populationThis study retrospectively included IHCA patients who underwent ECPR between January 2018 and December 2022 in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The enrollment criteria for ECPR are in accordance with Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) guidelines (Richardson et al., 2021): 1) age <70 years; 2) witnessed cardiac arrest; 3) first CPR (“no flow interval”) <5 minutes or bystander CPR; 4) initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation (VF)/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT)/absence of pulsatile electrical activity (PEA); 5) ECMO blood flow arrest <60 minutes “low flow interval” (unless other favorable prognostic features are present, such as intermittent recovery from autonomic circulation, preoperative hypothermia, rejuvenation, or stable vital signs during CPR); 6) intermittent return of spontaneous circulation or recurrent ventricular fibrillation; 7) no previously known life-limiting comorbidities (e.g., end-stage heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-stage renal failure, liver failure, end-stage disease), and consistent with the patient’s goals of care; and finally,8) no known aortic insufficiency (mild aortic dyskinesia should be ruled out).
A total of 126 IHCA patients met the criteria for VA ECMO support. Among them, exclusion criteria included 28 patients with cardiac arrest caused by infectious shock, 18 patients who received ECMO assistance for less than 48 hours, as well as two pregnant women and two individuals under the age of 18 (Figure 1). After the screening process, a total of 76 eligible patients were ultimately included.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of patient inclusion and exclusion. IHCA, in-hospital cardiac arrest; ECPR, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; EOP, early onset pneumonia.
The present study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China (no. 2020-KY-429).
2.2 Data collection and processingWe collected and documented baseline information and laboratory test data from the electronic medical record system for the enrolled patients. Baseline information encompassed age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, comorbidities, primary disease, intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) utilization, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on admission, time consumption for VA-ECMO intubation, duration of ECPR, method of cannulation; baseline laboratory data at admission and the most aberrant laboratory test results during ECMO (>48 hours <7 days after ECMO).
The BALF samples collected from a subset of enrolled patients within 48 hours after ECMO assistance were tested with mNGS. Additionally, BALF samples collected either within 48 hours or between 48 hours and 7 days after ECMO assistance were subjected to routine culture. The specific results obtained from mNGS testing and BALF culture were recorded.
2.3 Definition and clinical outcomesEOP was diagnosed when the patient met all clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria within 48h-7d after meeting ECPR (Ryu et al., 2015). Clinical criteria for EOP required the presence of at least two of the following: 1) fever ≥ 38.0°C (temperature in ECMO patients is typically regulated by extracorporeal circulation); 2) leukocytosis or leukopenia; and 3) purulent tracheobronchial secretions. Radiological criteria for EOP included new or progressive infiltrates or newly developed solid lesions on chest radiographs. Microbiological criteria involved the absence of normal positive respiratory cultures indicating a typical flora. Additionally, two independent physicians will validate the diagnosis of EOP to ensure accuracy and comparability. Prophylactic antibiotic use was defined as antibiotics given before signs of infection within 24 hours of ECPR. Time consumption for ECPR referred to the duration from preparation to establishment of adequate ECMO flow. The criteria for successful ECMO weaning were defined as achieving hemodynamic stability within 24 hours after withdrawal of ECMO and not requiring additional assistance from extracorporeal life support (ECLS).
The primary outcome of this study was the diagnosis of EOP, while the secondary outcomes included successful ECMO weaning and survival at discharge. Additionally, no cases of late-onset pneumonia were observed in non-EOP patients.
2.4 ECPR proceduresAll patients received VA ECMO support (Maquet Cardiopulonic, Hirlingen, Germany) with percutaneous vascular access as the preferred method using the Seldinger technique due to its advantages of easy insertion and removal of cannulas. Surgical excisional exposure was considered a secondary option when percutaneous cannulation failed (Ryu et al., 2015; Vakil et al., 2021). The femoral vessel was used as the vascular access site in all cases with 19-25 French vein cannulas and 15-17 French artery cannulas. The cessation of cardiac compressions is recommended once the flow rate of VA ECMO reaches 3 L/min, indicating the establishment of sufficient circulation (Richardson et al., 2021). Unisolated heparin was used as an anticoagulant to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) of 1.5 times the upper limit of normal and a partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of 40-55 seconds.
The ECMO flow rate are adjusted to meet the criteria of a patient with a cardiac index exceeding 2.2 L/min/m2, a central mixed venous oxygen saturation above 70%, and a mean arterial pressure higher than 65 mmHg (Park et al., 2014). Typically, an arterial catheter is utilized for continuous blood pressure monitoring. Once successfully initiated, prompt identification and treatment of the underlying cause of cardiac arrest are imperative. If a flow rate ranging from 0.5-1.0 L/min is achieved, consideration may be given to discontinuing VA ECMO support. However, each stage of flow reduction should be evaluated through echocardiography and hemodynamic assessment (Richardson et al., 2021).
2.5 mNGS methodology and processAfter preprocessing of the BALF samples, microbial genomic DNA was extracted using the TIANamp Micro DNA kit (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, DNA libraries were constructed through processes including DNA fragmentation, end-repair, 3’ adenylation, adapter ligation, PCR amplification and purification. The quality of the resulting libraries was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, USA) and an ABI StepOnePlus real-time PCR system. Finally, qualified libraries were subjected to sequencing on a NextSeq 550Dx platform (Illumina, USA) with a read length of 75 bp.
Illumina Next 550 sequencers are utilized for macrogenomics sequencing, with each macrogenomics sequencing batch containing 15-20 samples and including one negative control. The internal reference is derived from Arabidopsis thaliana and is provided by the sequencing manufacturer. High-quality sequencing data were obtained by eliminating low-quality and short reads (<35bp in length), followed by the generation of strictly aligned reads to pathogen species (SDSMRN) and pathogen genus (SDSMRNG). The list of microorganisms acquired through the aforementioned analytical process was compared against an internal background database encompassing microorganisms present in over 50% of laboratory samples within the past three months. Suspected background microorganisms were excluded, while suspicious pathogens were identified as those exhibiting SDSMRN > 50 and at least three times higher than the control; however, suspicious pathogens with SDSMRN < 50 should have a minimum fivefold increase compared to the control.
2.6 Statistical analysisStatistical analysis of all collected data was performed using SPSS for Windows (version 21.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared using an unpaired t-test. Skewed continuous variables were expressed as quartiles and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were represented as frequency (composition ratio) and compared using Pearson’s χ test or Fisher’s exact test. Multicollinearity among predictors was assessed using variance inflation factors (VIFs). A VIF value exceeding 10 was considered indicative of significant collinearity. For the logistic regression analysis, we employed a binary logistic regression model to examine the relationship between the predictor variables and the outcome variable. P<0.05 indicates that the differences were statistically significant.
3 Results3.1 Comparative analysis of patients undergoing ECPR based on ECMO weaning and survival status at dischargeThe comparison of ECPR patients between the successful ECMO weaning group and the ECMO weaning failure group is presented in Table 1. ECPR patients who successfully weaned from ECMO exhibited lower SOFA scores on admission in comparison to those with failed weaning (11.89 ± 2.19 vs 13.58 ± 1.75, p<0.001, Table 1). Moreover, they had a shorter duration of ECPR consumption (31.78 ± 14.18 min vs 40.20 ± 18.61 min, p=0.031, Table 1), and had higher rates of mNGS testing (47.2% vs 15%, p=0.002, Table 1). Baseline lactate levels were lower in the success group compared to the failure group; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance level.
Table 1. The characteristics between the successful ECMO weaning group and the ECMO weaning failure group.
The comparison of ECPR patients based on survival status at discharge is presented in Table 2. The survival group exhibited a lower incidence of CRRT (34.8% vs 66.0%, p=0.014, Table 2), higher utilization of mNGS testing (54.2% vs 19.2%, p=0.002, Table 2), greater success in ECMO weaning (100% vs 23.1%, p<0.001, Table 2), shorter duration of ECPR consumption (29.75 ± 13.15 min vs 39.19 ± 17.96 min, p=0.024, Table 2), and lower SOFA scores (10.96 ± 1.88 vs 13.62 ± 1.68, p<0.001, Table 2) compared to the non-survival group at discharge. Laboratory examinations upon admission revealed lower levels of creatinine (89.66 ± 43.75 μmol/L vs 118.89 ± 62.58 μmol/L, p=0.043, Table 2) and lactate (7.35 ± 4.82 mmol/L vs 11.57 ± 5.69 mmol/L, p=0.002, Table 2) in the survival group compared to the non-survival group. During the period >48h and within 7d after ECMO, the most aberrant laboratory examinations showed lower WBC counts [(9.49 ± 3.80)×109/L vs (12.80 ± 6.57)×109/L, p=0.024, Table 2], ALT [85.50 (52.50-164.75)U/L vs 238.50 (90.00-754.00)U/L, p=0.003, Table 2], AST[142.50 (83.50-221.00)U/L vs 447.50 (119.75-1683.25)U/L, p=0.001, Table 2], creatinine (133.51 ± 89.93 μmol/L vs 187.61 ± 89.24 μmol/L, p=0.017, Table 2), and NT-pro-BNP [2785 (738.5-5620.05)pg/ml vs 5566.00 (1720.75-11828.50)pg/ml, p=0.024, Table 2] levels in the survival group compared to the non-survival group.
Table 2. The characteristics between the survivors and the non-survivors at discharge.
3.2 Characteristics of EOP and non-EOP patientsCompared to non-EOP patients, EOP patients exhibited significantly higher SOFA scores (13.70 ± 1.86 vs 12.27 ± 2.12, p=0.004, Table 3), longer duration of ECPR consumption (42.41 ± 17.20 min vs 32.80 ± 16.20 min, p=0.021, Table 3), lower rate of mNGS testing (11.1% vs 40.8%, p=0.007, Table 3), and elevated levels of CRP, PCT and WBC counts (the highest CRP, PCT and WBC counts during the period >48h and within 7d after ECMO) [CRP: 99.80 (58.20-171.50) mg/dl vs 34.19 (9.77-103.28) mg/dl, p =0.003; PCT: 12.52 (4.36-25.78) ng/ml vs 3.57 (0.38-15.77) ng/ml, p =0.003; WBC counts: (16.62 ± 6.19) ×109/L vs (9.08 ± 3.89)×109/L, p<0.001; respectively, Table 3] compared to non-EOP individuals.
Table 3. Characteristics of ECPR patients with or without EOP.
The gender, BMI, comorbidities, baseline levels of white blood cell counts, red blood cell counts, hemoglobin, platelet counts, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, creatinine, NT-proBNP, cTnI, CRP, procalcitonin and lactate; the most abnormal levels of red blood cell counts, hemoglobin and platelet counts during the period >48h and within 7d after ECMO assistance; the rate of successful weaning from ECMO; and percentages of prophylactic antibiotic use exhibited no statistically significant differences between EOP patients and non-EOP patients (all p>0.05; Table 3).
3.3 Details of mNGS assayAmong the 76 patients who underwent ECPR, BALF was tested using mNGS within 48 hours in a subset of 23 individuals (30.3%). Within this subgroup, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was identified as the primary cause in 16 patients (69.6%), while fulminant myocarditis accounted for the primary cause in 3 patients (13.0%). Furthermore, four patients (17.4%) were diagnosed with other conditions such as poisoning and smog exposure. Among these cases, eleven patients (47.8%) yielded positive mNGS results. Subsequently, we performed a specific analysis to identify the presence of pathogens associated with each respective primary disease (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Distribution of microorganisms that tested positive for mNGS. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; FM, fulminant myocarditis; G+, Gram-positive bacteria; G-, Gram-negative bacteria; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
The pathogens detected by mNGS (within 48 hours during ECMO) included bacteria and viruses, predominantly consisting of oropharyngeal colonizing bacteria. Specifically, the detected strains comprised 4 strains of Haemophilus parainfluenzae, 2 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 1 strain each of Streptococcus anginosus and Streptococcus mitis, as well as single strains of Staphylococcus hominis, Gemella morbillorum, Haemophilus influenzae, Dialister pneumosintes. Additionally, there were 3 strains of Human alpha herpes virus 1, 2 strains of Human beta herpes virus 5, along with single strains of Epstein-Barr virus, Human parainfluenza virus 3, Cyto Megalo Virus and Torque teno virus type29.
The positive pathogens detected were classified based on the primary disease. Among 16 patients with AMI, a total of 4 (30.8%) Gram-positive strains, 3 (23.1%) Gram-negative strains, and 6 (46.2%) viral strains were identified. In the case of fulminant myocarditis in 3 patients, one (25.0%) Gram-positive strain, two (50.0%) Gram-negative strains, and one (25.0%) viral strain were detected.
3.4 Comparison of mNGS assay and BALF culture resultsBALF culture results performed in parallel (<48h) with the mNGS test revealed no bacterial or other pathogenic growth. However, 48 hours to 7 days after ECMO onset, all EOP patients’ BALF cultures were positive. As shown in Figure 3, there were eight strains of Enterobacter aerogenes, six strains of Acinetobacter baumanii, four strains of Enterobacter cloacae, three strains of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, one strain of Bacteroides fragilis, and five strains of Staphylococcus aureus.
Figure 3. Positive pathogens detected by mNGS and BALF culture. A total of 48 pathogens were detected, including 39 bacteria, 9 viruses.
The comparison between mNGS and BALF culture results revealed that mNGS detected a higher proportion of Gram-positive bacteria and viruses as pathogens, whereas BALF culture results showed a higher proportion of Gram-negative bacteria.
3.5 Predictors of clinical outcomesLogistic regression was employed to analyze the predictors of ECMO weaning failure, mortality at discharge, and the incidence of EOP.
Ultimately, patients with lower SOFA scores on admission [OR (95%CI): 1.447 (1.107-1.890), p=0.007, Table 4] and those who underwent early mNGS testing within 48 hours after ECPR [OR (95%CI): 0.273 (0.086-0.865), p=0.027, Table 4] demonstrated a higher probability of successful weaning from ECMO.
Table 4. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictors of ECMO weaning failure, mortality at discharge, and the incidence of EOP.
Patients with higher SOFA scores on admission [OR (95%CI): 2.404 (1.422-4.064), p=0.001, Table 4], and elevated lactate levels [OR (95%CI): 1.176 (1.017-1.361), p=0.029, Table 4] exhibited an increased likelihood of mortality at discharge.
Furthermore, early mNGS detection [OR (95%CI): 0.186 (0.035-0.979), p=0.047, Table 4], and lower CRP levels (48h-7d after ECMO) [OR (95%CI):1.011 (1.003-1.019), p=0.006, Table 4] were associated with a reduced incidence of EOP.
4 DiscussionIn the present study investigating patients who underwent ECPR following IHCA, early mNGS testing of BALF samples was associated with a reduced occurrence of EOP and improved successful weaning from ECMO.
In the logistic regression model, early mNGS testing was found to be an independent negative predictor of EOP development and an independent positive predictor of successful withdrawal of ECMO in patients undergoing ECPR. Nosocomial infections significantly contribute to mortality among critically ill patients admitted to hospitals, particularly those who have experienced cardiac arrest. The reported incidence of hospital-acquired infections in ECMO patients varies widely in the literature, ranging from 20% to 60% (Schmidt et al., 2012; Grasselli et al., 2017; Austin et al., 2017; Juthani et al., 2018; Bizzarro et al., 2011). ECPR patients often undergo various invasive procedures such as tracheal intubation, placement of indwelling ECMO cannula, deep venous puncture, CRRT and IABP, which substantially increase the risk of infection (Vincent et al., 1995). In our study, BALF samples were collected within 48 hours after initiation of ECMO from IHCA patients and subjected to routine culture and mNGS testing. The results revealed that routine cultures yielded negative findings for BALF samples; however, mNGS detected multiple pathogens including bacteria and viruses with a predominance of viral species and oral colonizing bacteria. Between 48 hours and 7 days after ECMO initiation, BALF cultures from ECPR patients demonstrated the presence of multiple pathogenic bacteria including multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains such as Acinetobacter baumannii and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
The infection caused by MDR pathogens has been demonstrated to be a significant risk factor for increased mortality in ECPR patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and is also associated with higher costs of ICU admission (Neidell et al., 2012; Depuydt et al., 2008). Due to the prolonged use of antibiotics, patients in the ICU are particularly susceptible to MDR pathogen infections. In our study, most of the ECPR patients received prophylactic antibiotic therapy but inevitably developed MDR pathogenic infections. Therefore, it is crucial for us to address how we can effectively prevent and reduce MDR infections. In this study, we have introduced a novel diagnostic test that facilitates the identification of pathogen distribution among patients undergoing ECPR following IHCA, and evaluates its diagnostic efficacy for EOP.
The mNGS test has been widely employed in clinical practice. In the context of infectious diseases, the mNGS test exhibits exceptional sensitivity, a short testing cycle, and broad applicability (Brown et al., 2018; Carpenter et al., 2019). Moreover, it obviates the need for pathogenic bacterial isolation and remains unaffected by antibiotic usage, thereby reducing false negative rates. Importantly, mNGS analysis holds the potential to detect all nucleotide sequences within a sample theoretically enabling simultaneous analysis of multiple pathogens. A recent investigation demonstrated that mNGS of BALF samples could yield more precise diagnostic information for lung infections (Chen et al., 2021). In our study cohort, patients who underwent early mNGS testing exhibited significantly higher success rates in ECMO withdrawal and notably lower incidence of EOP. Additionally, the small proportion of Gram-positive bacteria shown by the mNGS test may be due to the fact that the majority of prophylactic antibiotic applications were broad-spectrum antibiotics targeting Gram-positive bacteria.
The incidence of MDR can be reduced by shortening the duration of prophylactic antibiotic administration for individuals without detectable causative organisms. Conversely, individuals with identified suspected causative organisms should adjust their dosing regimen to precisely treat existing infections and prevent the emergence of medically-induced MDR infections resulting from antibiotic misuse. Additionally, patients undergoing ECPR exhibit heightened levels of inflammatory factors and may even develop a systemic inflammatory response (Stub et al., 2011; Wengenmayer et al., 2017; Millar et al., 2016). Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of EOP. Not only does infection directly contribute to EOP, but it also exacerbates inflammation, thereby promoting the development of EOP and potentially influencing the success of ECMO withdrawal. This study reaffirmed the association between inflammation and EOP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that CRP serves as one of the predictors for EOP development, consistent with previous research findings (Shiba et al., 2020). Although PCT levels were significantly higher in the EOP group compared to the non-EOP group, they did not independently predict EOP occurrence, aligning with prior studies (Mongardon et al., 2010; Zielińska-Borkowska et al., 2012).
Furthermore, our study confirms previous findings regarding the relationship between SOFA score and mortality rate at charge, ECPR time-consuming and incidence of EOP, which is consistent with previous studies (Haas et al., 2017; Rietdijk et al., 2020). The lack of significant correlation between ECPR time-consuming and mortality may be attributed to limited sample size considerations. In recent years, lactate has emerged as a critical predictor for assessing the risk of death and neurological outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac arrest (Bartos et al., 2020; Hayashida et al., 2017). Pre-ECPR lactate levels have been increasingly recognized as a potential prognostic marker for mortality, supported by several studies (Bertic et al., 2022; Dennis et al., 2017; Halenarova et al., 2022). However, post-ECPR, the use of lactate clearance as a prognostic marker remains debated. A cohort study on ECPR patients reported limited prognostic value for lactate clearance in predicting mortality (Jung et al., 2019). Conversely, an international multicenter study highlighted the association between pre-ECPR lactate levels, lactate clearance within 24 hours of ECPR initiation, and one-year survival in refractory cardiac arrest patients. They found a significant, dose-dependent correlation between lactate clearance and one-year survival (Thevathasan et al., 2024). Our study identified peak lactate levels post-ECPR as an independent predictor of mortality at discharge. However, we acknowledge that our study did not specifically analyze lactate clearance post-ECPR, which limits our comprehensive understanding of lactate dynamics in post-ECPR prognosis.
The current study has several limitations. Firstly, the retrospective design and small sample size present significant limitations that affect the generalizability of our findings. The retrospective nature of the study means that the data was collected from existing records, which may introduce inconsistencies and incomplete information not originally intended for the current research focus. This could lead to inaccuracies and limit the applicability of our results to other settings or populations. Secondly, considering the financial burden associated with mNGS testing, a majority of the patients tested were critically ill. Finally, only 23 patients underwent mNGS within 48 hours after ECPR, out of which only 11 BALF specimens yielded pathogen detection. Therefore, it is crucial to emphasize the significance of mNGS testing following ECPR and advocate for multiple repetitions of mNGS testing along with comparison to conventional cultures.
5 ConclusionIn patients treated with ECPR following IHCA, early mNGS testing to clarify microbial flora facilitates timely adjustments of antibiotic regimens, potentially reducing the incidence of EOP and improving short-term patient prognosis.
Data availability statementThe datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena, PRJEB72354.
Ethics statementThe studies involving humans were approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China (no. 2020-KY-429). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because approval for this retrospective observational study was obtained from the hospital research ethics board, and the need to obtain informed consent was waived.
Author contributionsR-MG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. X-XL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Y-HZ: Data curation, Software, Writing – original draft. Y-JL: Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. JL: Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. G-WF: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. HZ: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Y-CZ: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Validation. XZ: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis, Methodology.
FundingThe author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s noteAll claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
ReferencesAndersen, L. W., Holmberg, M. J., Berg, K. M., Donnino, M. W., Granfeldt, A. (2019). In-hospital cardiac arrest: A review. JAMA 321, 1200–1210. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1696
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Austin, D. E., Kerr, S. J., Al-Soufi, S., Connellan, M., Spratt, P., Goeman, E., et al. (2017). Nosocomial infections acquired by patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit. Care Resusc 19, 68–75.
Bartos, J. A., Grunau, B., Carlson, C., Duval, S., Ripeckyj, A., Kalra, R., et al. (2020). Improved survival with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation despite progressive metabolic derangement associated with prolonged resuscitation. Circulation 141, 877–886. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.042173
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Bertic, M., Worme, M., Foroutan, F., Rao, V., Ross, H., Billia, F., et al. (2022). Predictors of survival and favorable neurologic outcome in patients treated with eCPR: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 15, 279–290. doi: 10.1007/s12265-021-10195-9
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Bizzarro, M. J., Conrad, S. A., Kaufman, D. A., Rycus, P. (2011). Infections acquired during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates, children, and adults. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 12, 277–281. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e28894
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Brown, J. R., Bharucha, T., Breuer, J. (2018). Encephalitis diagnosis using metagenomics: application of next generation sequencing for undiagnosed cases. J. Infect. 76, 225–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.12.014
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. L., Tan, S. K., Watson, T., Bacher, R., Nagesh, V., Watts, A., et al. (2019). Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for identification and quantitation of transplant-related DNA viruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 57, e01113-19. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01113-19
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Chen, X., Ding, S., Lei, C., Qin, J., Guo, T., Yang, D., et al. (2020). Blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pneumonia. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 6839103. doi: 10.1155/2020/6839103
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Feng, W., Ye, K., Guo, L., Xia, H., Guan, Y., et al. (2021). Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pulmonary infectious pathogens from bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 11. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.541092
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Mccanny, P., D'souza, M., Forrest, P., Burns, B., Lowe, D. A., et al. (2017). Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest: A multicentre experience. Int. J. Cardiol. 231, 131–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.003
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Depuydt, P., Vandijck, D., Bekaert, M., Decruyenaere, J., Blot, S., Vogelaers, D., et al. (2008). Determinants and impact of multidrug antibiotic resistance in pathogens causing ventilator-associated-pneumonia. Crit Care. 12, R142. doi: 10.1186/cc7119
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Deurenberg, R. H., Bathoorn, E., Chlebowicz, M. A., Couto, N., Ferdous, M., García-Cobos, S., et al. (2017). Application of next generation sequencing in clinical microbiology and infection prevention. J. Biotechnol. 243, 16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.12.022
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
François, B., Cariou, A., Clere-Jehl, R., Renon-Carron, F., Daix, T.. (2019). Prevention of early ventilator-associated pneumonia after cardiac arrest. N Engl. J. Med. 381, 1831–1842. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812379
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Grasselli, G., Scaravilli, V., Di Bella, S., Biffi, S., Bombino, M., Patroniti, N., et al. (2017). Nosocomial infections during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: incidence, etiology, and impact on patients' Outcome. Crit. Care Med. 45, 1726–1733. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002652
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Grumaz, S., Grumaz, C., Vainshtein, Y., Stevens, P., Glanz, K., Decker, S. O., et al. (2019). Enhanced performance of next-generation sequencing diagnostics compared with standard of care microbiological diagnostics in patients suffering from septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 47, e394–e402. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003658
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Haas, N. L., Coute, R. A., Hsu, C. H., Cranford, J. A., Neumar, R. W. (2017). Descriptive analysis of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-An ELSO registry study. Resuscitation 119, 56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.08.003
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Halenarova, K., Belliato, M., Lunz, D., Peluso, L., Broman, L. M., Malfertheiner, M. V., et al. (2022). Predictors of poor outcome after extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest (ECPR): A post hoc analysis of a multicenter database. Resuscitation 170, 71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.015
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Hayashida, K., Suzuki, M., Yonemoto, N., Hori, S., Tamura, T., Sakurai, A., et al. (2017). Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcomes in patients with postcardiac arrest syndrome: A prospective, multicenter observational study (SOS-KANTO 2012 study). Crit. Care Med. 45, e559–e566. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002307
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Jung, C., Bueter, S., Wernly, B., Masyuk, M., Saeed, D., Albert, A., et al. (2019). Lactate clearance predicts good neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J. Clin. Med. 8, 374. doi: 10.3390/jcm8030374
PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar
Juthani, B. K., Macfarlan, J., Wu, J., Misselbeck, T. S. (2018). Incidence of nosocomial infections in adult patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Heart Lung 47, 626–630. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.07.004
留言 (0)