Six successful and successive cases of prostatectomy - Digital Collections - National Library of Medicine [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 26]. Available from: https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-101314149-bk

Souverein PC, Erkens JA, de la Rosette JJMCH, Leufkens HGM, Herings RMC (2003) Drug treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and hospital admission for BPH-related surgery. Eur Urol. 43(5):528–534.

Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett ATK, Peters PC, Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL et al (1989) Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol. 141(2):243–7

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Pariser JJ, Packiam VT, Adamsky MA, Bales GT (2016) Trends in simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Urol Rep 17(8):57

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Levasseur-Fortin P, Law KW, Nguyen DD, Zakaria A, Misrai V, Elterman D et al (2020) National discrepancies in residency training of open simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic enlargement: redefining our gold standard. Can Urol Assoc J 14(6):182–186

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sandhu JS, Bixler BR, Dahm P, Goueli R, Kirkby E, Stoffel JT et al (2023) Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): AUA Guideline Amendment 2023. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003698

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jones P, Alzweri L, Rai BP, Somani BK, Bates C, Aboumarzouk OM (2016) Holmium laser enucleation versus simple prostatectomy for treating large prostates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arab J Urol 14(1):50–58

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhanvadia R, Ashbrook C, Gahan J, Mauck R, Bagrodia A, Margulis V et al (2021) Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic vs open simple prostatectomy in the modern robotic era: results from the National Inpatient Sample. BJU Int 128(2):168–177

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li M, Qiu J, Hou Q, Wang D, Huang W, Hu C et al (2015) Endoscopic enucleation versus open prostatectomy for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0121265

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lin Y, Wu X, Xu A, Ren R, Zhou X, Wen Y et al (2016) Transurethral enucleation of the prostate versus transvesical open prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Urol 34(9):1207–1219

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang YB, Yan SY, Xu XF, Huang X, Luo LS, Deng YQ et al (2021) Comparison on the efficacy and safety of different surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia with volume >60 ml: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Mens Health 15(6):15579883211067086

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Haibin W, Lin Q, Junxiu W, Heng W, Qi Z, Yanpeng W et al (2021) Transurethral laser versus open simple prostatectomy for large volume prostates: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci 36(6):1191–1200

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alivizatos G, Skolarikos A, Chalikopoulos D, Papachristou C, Sopilidis O, Dellis A et al (2008) Transurethral photoselective vaporization versus transvesical open enucleation for prostatic adenomas >80ml: 12-mo results of a randomized prospective study. Eur Urol 54(2):427–437

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen S, Zhu L, Cai J, Zheng Z, Ge R, Wu M et al (2014) Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate compared with open prostatectomy for prostates larger than 100 grams: a randomized noninferiority controlled trial with long-term results at 6 years. Eur Urol 66(2):284–291

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Geavlete B, Bulai C, Ene C, Checherita I, Geavlete P (2015) Bipolar vaporization, resection, and enucleation versus open prostatectomy: optimal treatment alternatives in large prostate cases? J Endourol 29(3):323–331

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giulianelli R, Brunori S, Gentile BC, Vincenti G, Nardoni S, Pisanti F, et al. (2011) Comparative randomized study on the efficaciousness of treatment of BOO due to BPH in patients with prostate up to 100 gr by endoscopic gyrus prostate resection versus open prostatectomy. Preliminary data. Arch Ital Urol Androl Organo Uff Soc Ital Ecogr Urol E Nefrol 83(2):88–94.

Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 53(1):160–166

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Long Z, Zhang YC, He LY, Zhong KB, Tang YX, Huang K (2014) Comparison of transurethral plasmakinetic and transvesical prostatectomy in treatment of 100–149 mL benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Surg 37(2):58–64

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A, Scattoni V, Guazzoni G, Colombo R et al (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up. Eur Urol 50(3):563–568

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ou R, You M, Tang P, Chen H, Deng X, Xie K (2010) A randomized trial of transvesical prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostate greater than 80 mL. Urology 76(4):958–961

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ou R, Deng X, Yang W, Wei X, Chen H, Xie K (2013) Transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate vs transvesical prostatectomy for prostate volumes >80 mL: a prospective randomized study. BJU Int 112(2):239–245

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rao JM, Yang JR, Ren YX, He J, Ding P, Yang JH (2013) Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate versus transvesical open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia >80 mL: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Urology 82(1):176–181

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 64(4):401–6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 11]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook

Uroweb - European Association of Urology [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 26]. EAU Guidelines on the Management of Non-neurogenic Male LUTS - INTRODUCTION - Uroweb. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/management-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts

Varkarakis I, Kyriakakis Z, Delis A, Protogerou V, Deliveliotis C (2004) Long-term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients. Urology 64(2):306–310

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Serretta V, Morgia G, Fondacaro L, Curto G, Lo bianco A, Pirritano D, et al (2002) Open prostatectomy for benign prostatic enlargement in southern Europe in the late 1990s: a contemporary series of 1800 interventions. Urology 60(4):623–627.

Adam C, Hofstetter A, Deubner J, Zaak D, Weitkunat R, Seitz M et al (2004) Retropubic transvesical prostatectomy for significant prostatic enlargement must remain a standard part of urology training. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38(6):472–476

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, Karl A, Hermanek P, Lack N et al (2007) Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 177(4):1419–1422

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suer E, Gokce I, Yaman O, Anafarta K, Göğüş O (2008) Open prostatectomy is still a valid option for large prostates: a high-volume, single-center experience. Urology 72(1):90–94

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meier DE, Tarpley JL, Imediegwu OO, Olaolorun DA, Nkor SK, Amao EA et al (1995) The outcome of suprapubic prostatectomy: a contemporary series in the developing world. Urology 46(1):40–44

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

McCullough TC, Heldwein FL, Soon SJ, Galiano M, Barret E, Cathelineau X et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: an evaluation of morbidity. J Endourol 23(1):129–134

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Condie JD, Cutherell L, Mian A (1999) Suprapubic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in rural Asia: 200 consecutive cases. Urology 54(6):1012–1016

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lambert E, Goossens M, Palagonia E, Vollemaere J, Mazzone E, Dell’Oglio P et al (2021) Changes in serum PSA after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate are predictive for the future diagnosis of prostate cancer. World J Urol 39(7):2621–2626

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sutherland DE, Perez DS, Weeks DC (2011) Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for severe benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 25(4):641–644

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Capogrosso P, Capitanio U, Vertosick EA, Ventimiglia E, Chierigo F, Oreggia D et al (2018) Temporal trend in incidental prostate cancer detection at surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 122:152–157

Article  PubMed