1Department of Clinical Nutrition, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Gastroenterology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Xiaoping Niu, Department of Gastroenterology, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2 Zheshan West Road, Wuhu, Anhui, 241000, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]
Background: The close association between inflammation and the clinical outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been extensively documented. This study aims to analyze the association between a novel inflammatory indicator, the gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to neutrophil ratio (GNR), and HCC prognosis following curative resection.
Methods: A cohort of 204 eligible HCC cases were included. Based on an optimal cut-off value determined utilizing the X-tile software, patients were categorized into low- and high-GNR groups. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis method with Log rank tests. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was used to investigate the independent association between GNR and HCC prognosis. Restricted cubic splines were used to explore the nonlinear relationship between GNR and the risk of death or recurrence.
Results: The low GNR group exhibited significantly higher 3-year OS and RFS rates than the high GNR group. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that a high GNR level was independently associated with poor OS and RFS. A linear correlation between GNR and the risk of death, as well as a nonlinear inverted “U” shape correlation between GNR and the risk of recurrence, were observed.
Conclusion: The findings provide evidence supporting the independent association of GNR with HCC prognosis. These results offer promise for enhancing prognosis assessments and guiding active monitoring strategies for patients with HCC post-curative resection.
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to neutrophil ratio, prognosis, curative resection
Primary liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide in 2022, with an estimated 865,000 new cases and 758,000 deaths.1 Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75–85% of all cases and is the predominant type.1 Despite curative resection being the primary treatment for HCC, post-surgical outcomes are often unsatisfactory.2,3 Thus, there is a crucial need to identify high-risk patients with a poor prognosis in a practical and simple manner to enhance clinical management and prognosis.
The close association between inflammation and the clinical outcomes of HCC is well-documented.4 Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), a serum enzyme and liver function marker, is linked to inflammation and carcinogenesis.5 Previous studies have demonstrated that preoperative serum GGT levels are independently associated with the prognosis of HCC after liver transplantation, after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, after ablation therapy, after curative resection, or in HCC cases of AFP-negative.6–10 Neutrophils (NEUT), a component of the inflammatory response, have been linked to aggressive behavior in HCC patients.11 Neutrophils not only influence the development of HCC but also play a crucial role in predicting clinical outcomes.12 However, no studies have examined the relationship between the preoperative gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to neutrophil ratio (GNR) and HCC prognosis following curative resection. This study aimed to address this gap in the literature.
MethodsPatientsWe retrospectively enrolled 204 eligible patients diagnosed with primary HCC between March 2012 and January 2021 at Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College. Patients were excluded based on the following criteria: (1) previous hepatectomy; (2) multiple primary malignancies; (3) distant organ metastasis; (4) neoadjuvant therapy; (5) diseases that affect hematological parameters, such as: acute inflammatory disease, autoimmune disease, or haematopoietic system disease; (6) survival time < 1 month; (7) incomplete clinical data or follow-up information. Patients were staged using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system.13 Postoperative follow-up occurred every 3–6 months in the first 2 years and then every 6–12 months. Patients underwent imaging examinations, such as ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging, for a comprehensive evaluation during the follow-up period. Prognostic information was obtained via medical records and/or direct telephone conversations with patients or patient families until January 2022. This research was carried out in compliance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to retrospective and non-interventional nature of the study, ethics approval was waived by the Division of Science and Technology of Yijishan hospital of Wannan Medical college in accordance with national legislation and institutional requirements. The necessity for obtaining informed consent was waived in this study as it did not pertain to personal privacy or commercial concerns, and all patient information was kept confidential and anonymized.
Data CollectionOverall survival (OS) refers to the time from surgery to death or last follow-up (censored). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) refers to the time from surgery to disease recurrence detection, death or last follow-up (censored). The outcomes was 3-year OS and RFS rates. Preoperative hematology data included alpha-fetoprotein (AFP, <400/≥400 ng/mL), albumin (ALB, <35/≥35 g/L), hemoglobin (HB), lymphocyte (LYM), monocyte (MONO), neutrophil (NEUT), prothrombin time (PT, <=14/>14 s), fibrinogen (Fib), total bilirubin (TBIL, <34/≥34 umol/L), platelet (PLT, <100/≥100 ×109/L), GGT, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT, <40/≥40 U/L) was obtained within seven days prior to the scheduled surgery. Additionally, clinicopathological features such as age (<=60/>60 years), gender, cirrhosis (no/yes), ascites (no/yes), microvascular invasion (MVI, no/yes), tumor size (<5/≥5 cm), tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (I/II–III), and tumor number (solitary/multiple) were collected. The GNR was calculated as GGT (U/L) divided by neutrophil count (×109/L).
Statistical AnalysisContinuous variables with normal or non-normal distribution were presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range), respectively, and compared using t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were presented as frequency (percentage) and compared using chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The optimal cut-off value for GNR was determined using X-tile software (https://x-tile.software.informer.com/). Patients were categorized into high- and low-GNR groups based on this value. OS and RFS rates were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier (KM) method and compared using the Log rank test. Univariate Cox analysis was used to identify significant relationships (P < 0.05) between variables and prognosis. Significant variables were included in multivariate Cox analysis to determine the independent relationship between GNR and prognosis. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) was used to evaluate the non-linear relationship between GNR values and the risk of death or recurrence based on multivariate analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using the R project (version 4.3.3), and a P-value < 0.05 in two-tailed tests was considered statistically significant.
ResultsBaseline CharacteristicsA total of 204 patients were enrolled in the analysis. Among them, 47 patients (23.0%) died and 69 patients (33.8%) developed recurrences, with a median follow-up of 33.8 months. The patients were predominantly elderly (53.4%), males (81.4%), with a tumor size ≥5 cm (52.5%), no MVI (81.4%), in tumor stage I (68.1%), had single tumor nodule (84.8%), cirrhosis (63.2%), and no ascites (78.9%) (Table 1). Based on the optimal cut off value of GNR (13.2), the patients were categorized into high- and low-groups (Supplementary Figure 1). The detailed baseline characteristics are shown in Figure 1.
Table 1 Clinicopathological Variables of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Underwent Curative Resection
Figure 1 Prognostic significance of GNR in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent curative hepatectomy: Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival (A) and recurrence-free survival (B).
Kaplan-Meier Analysis Based on Different GNR LevelsThe low GNR group had a significant higher 3-year OS than the high GNR group (88.7% vs 70.9%, P < 0.05, Figure 1A). Similarly, the low GNR group had a significant higher 3-year RFS than the high GNR group (76.9% vs 56.0%, P < 0.001, Figure 1B).
GNR is Independently Associated with HCC PrognosisAs shown in Table 2, univariate analysis for OS indicated associations with cirrhosis, HB, LYM, and GNR. In the multivariate analysis, a high GNR level was independently associated with poor OS (HR: 4.14; 95% CI: 1.97–8.70; P < 0.001). For RFS, univariate analysis showed associations with ALT and GNR, while multivariate analysis indicated that a high GNR level was independently associated with poor RFS (HR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.38–4.08; P < 0.01).
Table 2 Univariate and Multivariate Analyses to Identify GNR Independently Associated with the Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Underwent Curative Resection
RCS Analyzes the Relationship Between the GNR Value and the Risk of Death or RecurrenceRCS was used to visualize the relationship between the GNR value and the risk of death or recurrence based on multivariate analysis. A linear relationship between GNR and the risk of death was found (P for non-linearity > 0.05); the curve showed an overall upward trend as GNR increased (Figure 2A). In Figure 2B, the curve exhibited an inverted “U” shape, indicating a nonlinear relationship between GNR and the risk of recurrence (P for non-linearity < 0.05). The risk of recurrence was positively correlated with GNR until it peaked at about 45, after which it declined slowly.
Figure 2 Associations between the GNR value and the risk of death (A) or recurrence (B) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent curative hepatectomy using restricted cubic spline.
DiscussionIn this study, we first investigated the association between preoperative GNR and HCC prognosis. Our results indicated that high GNR levels were independently association with poor OS or RFS. Furthermore, we observed a linear correlation between GNR and the risk of death, as well as a nonlinear inverted “U” shape correlation between GNR and the risk of recurrence.
GGT is commonly regarded as a marker reflecting the liver inflammation status.14,15 Inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and interferon-alpha/beta are known to stimulate the expression of GGT.16,17 Therefore, elevated GGT levels could be an indicator of the inflamed liver microenvironment. Additionally, several studies have reported a correlation between preoperative plasma GGT and HCC prognosis. Fu et al reported that an elevated GGT level is independently association with poor prognosis in HCC patients after liver transplantation.7 Zhang et al concluded that an elevated GGT level serve as an independent prognostic indicator for predicting the prognosis of patients with intermediate HCC after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.6 Lv et al discovered an independent association between elevated GGT levels and an unfavorable prognosis in patients with AFP-negative HCC post-resection.10 According to the findings of Ma et al, it was concluded that GGT is significantly linked to prognosis in patients with HCC who are undergoing radiofrequency ablation therapy.18 In terms of neutrophils, they are known to secrete vascular endothelial growth factor to facilitate tumor development.19 Furthermore, research has demonstrated that neutrophils have the ability to promote the migration and growth of tumors by secreting angiogenic factors and inflammatory mediators.20,21 Neutrophils also promote CCL2 expression in HCC, which may be associated with increased tumor size.22 Moreover, elevated neutrophils may increase tumor metastasis by promoting tumor cell adhesion to hepatic sinuses and increasing tumor cell motility.23,24 Therefore, the combination of GGT and neutrophils serves as a reflection of the inflammatory status, aiding in predicting the prognosis of HCC.
There are several limitations in this study. First, it was a retrospective single-center study with inherent selection bias, underscoring the need for validation through a prospective multicenter study with a large sample size. Second, the study participants were ethnically Chinese, raising uncertainties about the applicability of GNR in assessing the prognostic significance of patients from other ethnic backgrounds. Third, the specific mechanisms underlying the relationship between GNR and HCC prognosis warrant further elucidation. Fourth, it is important to acknowledge that the clinical applicability of this research is limited, and further studies are needed to validate our findings in order to improve their application in clinical settings.
ConclusionIn conclusion, we provided evidence that GNR is independently associated with OS and RFS in patients underwent curative resection for HCC, suggesting its potential use in identifying patients at high risk of an unfavorable prognosis. These findings hold promise for improving the assessment of prognosis and guiding active monitoring strategies for patients with HCC post-curative resection.
Ethics Approval and Consent to ParticipateDue to retrospective and non-interventional nature of the study, ethics approval was waived by the Division of Science and Technology of Yijishan hospital of Wannan Medical college in accordance with national legislation [Measures for Ethical Review of Life Sciences and Medical Research Involving Human Beings (February 18, 2023)] and institutional requirements. The necessity for obtaining informed consent was waived in this study as it did not pertain to personal privacy or commercial concerns, and all patient information was kept confidential and anonymized.
Author ContributionsAll authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
FundingThis research received no external funding.
DisclosureThe authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834
2. Pan X, Hu E, Zhou Y, et al. The prognostic nutritional index as a predictor of efficacy and early recurrence for adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2024;48(6):102344. doi:10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102344
3. Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1301–1314. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30010-2
4. Sanghera C, Teh JJ, Pinato DJ. The systemic inflammatory response as a source of biomarkers and therapeutic targets in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2019;39(11):2008–2023. doi:10.1111/liv.14220
5. Shen J, Tang L, Zhang X, et al. A novel index in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative hepatectomy: Albumin to Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Ratio (AGR). Front Oncol. 2019;9:817. doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.00817
6. Zhang JB, Chen Y, Zhang B, et al. Prognostic significance of serum gamma-glutamyl transferase in patients with intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23(9):787–793. doi:10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834902dd
7. Fu SJ, Zhao Q, Ji F, et al. Elevated preoperative serum gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase predicts poor prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28835. doi:10.1038/srep28835
8. Zhang H, Sheng S, Qiao W, et al. A novel nomogram to predict the overall survival of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients following ablation therapy. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1340286. doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1340286
9. Su TH, Huang SC, Chen CL, et al. Pre-operative gamma-glutamyl transferase levels predict outcomes in hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. J Formos Med Assoc. 2023;122(10):1008–1017. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2023.04.009
10. Lu LH, Wei-Wei, Kan A, et al. Novel value of preoperative gamma-glutamyltransferase levels in the prognosis of AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma. Dis Markers. 2020;2020:4269460. doi:10.1155/2020/4269460
11. Wang Y, Yao R, Zhang D, et al. Circulating neutrophils predict poor survival for HCC and promote HCC progression through p53 and STAT3 signaling pathway. J Cancer. 2020;11(13):3736–3744. doi:10.7150/jca.42953
12. Chen H, Zhou XH, Li JR, et al. Neutrophils: driving inflammation during the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2021;522:22–31. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2021.09.011
13. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more ”personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93–99. doi:10.3322/caac.21388
14. Liu W, Zhang F, Quan B, et al. The prognostic value of the albumin to Gamma-Glutamyltransferase ratio in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing radiofrequency ablation. Dis Markers. 2021;2021:3514827. doi:10.1155/2021/3514827
15. Ke Q, Xiang F, Xiao C, et al. Exploring the clinical value of preoperative serum gamma-glutamyl transferase levels in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1117. doi:10.1186/s12885-021-08843-z
16. Luo C, Xu B, Fan Y, et al. Preoperative gamma-glutamyltransferase is associated with cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival of nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3142926. doi:10.1155/2017/3142926
17. Hanigan MH. Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: redox regulation and drug resistance. Adv Cancer Res. 2014;122:103–141. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-420117-0.00003-7
18. Ma H, Zhang L, Tang B, et al. Gamma-Glutamyl transpeptidase is a prognostic marker of survival and recurrence in radiofrequency-ablation treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(9):3084–3089. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3724-4
19. Kusumanto YH, Dam WA, Hospers GA, et al. Platelets and granulocytes, in particular the neutrophils, form important compartments for circulating vascular endothelial growth factor. Angiogenesis. 2003;6(4):283–287. doi:10.1023/B:AGEN.0000029415.62384.ba
20. Liang J, Piao Y, Holmes L, et al. Neutrophils promote the malignant glioma phenotype through S100A4. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(1):187–198. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1279
21. van der Windt DJ, Sud V, Zhang H, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote inflammation and development of hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2018;68(4):1347–1360. doi:10.1002/hep.29914
22. Tsuda Y, Fukui H, Asai A, et al. An immunosuppressive subtype of neutrophils identified in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2012;51(3):204–212. doi:10.3164/jcbn.12-32
23. Wu Y, Zhao Q, Peng C, et al. Neutrophils promote motility of cancer cells via a hyaluronan-mediated TLR4/PI3K activation loop. J Pathol. 2011;225(3):438–447. doi:10.1002/path.2947
24. McDonald B, Spicer J, Giannais B, et al. Systemic inflammation increases cancer cell adhesion to hepatic sinusoids by neutrophil mediated mechanisms. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(6):1298–1305. doi:10.1002/ijc.24409
留言 (0)