Andrade R, Pereira R, van Cingel R, Staal JB, Espregueira-Mendes J. How should clinicians rehabilitate patients after ACL reconstruction? A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with a focus on quality appraisal (AGREE II). Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(9):512–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berg B, Urhausen AP, Øiestad BE, Whittaker JL, Culvenor AG, Roos EM, et al. What tests should be used to assess functional performance in youth and young adults following anterior cruciate ligament or meniscal injury? A systematic review of measurement properties for the OPTIKNEE consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(24):1454–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Whittaker JL, Culvenor AG, Juhl CB, Berg B, Bricca A, Filbay SR, et al. OPTIKNEE 2022: consensus recommendations to optimise knee health after traumatic knee injury to prevent osteoarthritis. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(24):1393–405.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davies WT, Myer GD, Read PJ. Is it time we better understood the tests we are using for return to sport decision making following ACL reconstruction? A critical review of the hop tests. Sports Med. 2020;50(3):485–95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

West TJ, Bruder AM, Crossley KM, Culvenor AG. Unilateral tests of lower-limb function as prognostic indicators of future knee-related outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 150 adolescents and adults. Br J Sports Med. 2023;57(13):855–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abrams GD, Harris JD, Gupta AK, McCormick FM, Bush-Joseph CA, Verma NN, et al. Functional performance testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014;2(1):2325967113518305.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wellsandt E, Failla M, Snyder-Mackler L. Limb symmetry indexes can overestimate knee function after ACL injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(5):334–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barbosa O, Kotsifaki R, Whiteley R, King E, Korakakis V. Beware of the “moving target”—uninvolved limb strength increases to exceed preoperative values during rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction in male professional and recreational athletes. J Orthopaed Sports Phys Ther [Internet]. 2024 Mar 12 [cited 2024 Mar 25]. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11961.

Riley RD, Jackson D, Salanti G, Burke DL, Price M, Kirkham J, et al. Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples. BMJ. 2017;13(358): j3932.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ardern CL, Büttner F, Andrade R, Weir A, Ashe MC, Holden S, et al. Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance. Br J Sports Med. 2021;56(4):175–95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Girdwood M, Culvenor A, Patterson B, Haberfield M, Rio E, Hedger M, et al. No sign of weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hip and calf muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Br J Sports Med. 2024;58(9):500–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Culvenor AG, Øiestad BE, Hart HF, Stefanik JJ, Guermazi A, Crossley KM. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis features on magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic uninjured adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(20):1268–78.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Walpole SC. Including papers in languages other than English in systematic reviews: important, feasible, yet often omitted. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;111:127–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Version 5.1.0]. Chichester: Wiley, [2008] ©2008; 2011.

RStudio Team. RStudio: integrated development for R [Internet]. Boston: RStudio, PBC; 2020 [cited 2021 Nov 16]. http://www.rstudio.com. Accessed 1 Dec 2023.

Friedrich JO, Adhikari NK, Beyene J. The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(1):32.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology. 1999;80(4):1150–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Girdwood MA, Patterson BE, Crossley KM, Guermazi A, Whitehead TS, Morris HG, et al. Hip rotation muscle strength is implicated in the progression of early post-traumatic osteoarthritis: a longitudinal evaluation up to 5 years following ACL reconstruction. Phys Ther Sport [Internet]. 2023 Jul 3 [cited 2023 Jul 4]; https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X23000767. Accessed 1 Dec 2023.

Lajeunesse MJ. On the meta-analysis of response ratios for studies with correlated and multi-group designs. Ecology. 2011;92(11):2049–55.

Article  Google Scholar 

Patterson BE, Crossley KM, Perraton LG, Kumar AS, King MG, Heerey JJ, et al. Limb symmetry index on a functional test battery improves between one and five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, primarily due to worsening contralateral limb function. Phys Ther Sport. 2020;44:67–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):1–13.

Article  Google Scholar 

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023) [Internet]. Cochrane, 2023; http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed 1 Dec 2023.

Trikalinos TA, Olkin I. Meta-analysis of effect sizes reported at multiple time points: a multivariate approach. Clin Trials. 2012;9(5):610–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ishak KJ, Platt RW, Joseph L, Hanley JA, Caro JJ. Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Clin Trials. 2007;4(5):525–39.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. 2010. 36(3):48.

Pustejovsky JE, Tipton E. Meta-analysis with robust variance estimation: expanding the range of working models. Prev Sci. 2022;23(3):425–38.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harrell FE. rms: regression modeling strategies [Internet]. 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms. Accessed 1 Dec 2023.

Harrell FE. General Aspects of Fitting Regression Models. In: Harrell Jr Frank E, editor. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015 [cited 2023 Sep 11]. p. 13–44. (Springer Series in Statistics). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7_2.

Pustejovsky JE. clubSandwich: cluster-robust (sandwich) variance estimators with small-sample corrections [Internet]. 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clubSandwich. Accessed 1 Dec 2023.

IntHout J, Ioannidis JPA, Rovers MM, Goeman JJ. Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7): e010247.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med. 2002;21(4):589–624.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Becker BJ. Using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models. J Educ Stat. 1992;17(4):341–62.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rodgers MA, Pustejovsky JE. Evaluating meta-analytic methods to detect selective reporting in the presence of dependent effect sizes. Psychol Methods. 2021;26(2):141–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Read P, Auliffe SM, Wilson MG, Myer GD. Better reporting standards are needed to enhance the quality of hop testing in the setting of ACL return to sport decisions: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(1):23–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Melick N, van Cingel REH, Brooijmans F, Neeter C, van Tienen T, Hullegie W, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(24):1506–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rambaud AJM, Ardern CL, Thoreux P, Regnaux JP, Edouard P. Criteria for return to running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(22):1437–44.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reid A, Birmingham TB, Stratford PW, Alcock GK, Giffin JR. Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Phys Ther. 2007;87(3):337–49.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

King E, Richter C, Franklyn-Miller A, Daniels K, Wadey R, Moran R, et al. Whole-body biomechanical differences between limbs exist 9 months after ACL reconstruction across jump/landing tasks. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(12):2567–78.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kotsifaki A, Korakakis V, Graham-Smith P, Sideris V, Whiteley R. Vertical and horizontal hop performance: contributions of the hip, knee, and ankle. Sports Health. 2021;13(2):128–35.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kotsifaki A, Van Rossom S, Whiteley R, Korakakis V, Bahr R, Sideris V, et al. Single leg vertical jump performance identifies knee function deficits at return to sport after ACL reconstruction in male athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(9):490–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ageberg E, Roos EM. The association between knee confidence and muscle power, hop performance, and postural orientation in people with anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(6):477–82.

Article  PubMed