Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett JC, et al. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. JAMA. 2003;289:194.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kuznetsova T, Herbots L, López B, et al. Prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in a general population. Circ: Heart Fail. 2009;2:105–12.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kloch-Badelek M, Kuznetsova T, Sakiewicz W, et al. Prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in European populations based on cross-validated diagnostic thresholds. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2012;10:10.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Colangelo LA, Lima JAC, et al. Prevalence and predictors of diastolic dysfunction according to different classification criteria. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185:1221–7.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the american society of echocardiography and the european association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:1321–60.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lancellotti P, Galderisi M, Edvardsen T, et al. Echo-Doppler estimation of left ventricular filling pressure: results of the multicentre EACVI euro-filling study. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:961–8.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Almeida JG, Fontes-Carvalho R, Sampaio F, et al. Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations on the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in the general population. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:380–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kimura K, Takenaka K, Ebihara A, et al. Speckle tracking global strain rate E/E′ predicts LV filling pressure more accurately than traditional tissue doppler E/E′: speckle tracking global strain rate E/E′ vs traditional tissue doppler E/E′. Echocardiography. 2012;29:404–10.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dokainish H, Sengupta R, Pillai M, et al. Usefulness of new diastolic strain and strain rate indexes for the estimation of left ventricular filling pressure. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1504–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morris DA, Takeuchi M, Nakatani S, et al. Lower limit of normality and clinical relevance of left ventricular early diastolic strain rate for the detection of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19:905–15.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu D, Hu K, Störk S, et al. Predictive value of assessing diastolic strain rate on survival in cardiac amyloidosis patients with preserved ejection fraction Gonzalez GE, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e115910.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ersboll M, Andersen MJ, Valeur N, et al. Early diastolic strain rate in relation to systolic and diastolic function and prognosis in acute myocardial infarction: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:648–56.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chan Y-H, Lee H-F, Wu L-S, et al. Ratio of transmitral early filling velocity to early diastolic strain rate predicts outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:79–85.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dahl JS, Barros-Gomes S, Videbæk L, et al. Early diastolic strain rate in relation to systolic and diastolic function and prognosis in aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:519–28.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goebel B, Haugaa KH, Meyer K, et al. Early diastolic strain rate predicts response to heart failure therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30:505–13.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lassen MCH, Biering-Sørensen SR, Olsen FJ, et al. Ratio of transmitral early filling velocity to early diastolic strain rate predicts long-term risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:518–25.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang J, Khoury DS, Thohan V, et al. Global diastolic strain rate for the assessment of left ventricular relaxation and filling pressures. Circulation. 2007;115:1376–83.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shanks M, Ng ACT, Van De Veire NRL, et al. Incremental prognostic value of novel left ventricular diastolic indexes for prediction of clinical outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:592–7.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jasaityte R, D’hooge J. Strain rate imaging: fundamental principles and progress so far. Imaging Med. 2010;2:547–63.

Google Scholar 

Edvardsen T, Gerber BL, Garot J, et al. Quantitative assessment of intrinsic regional myocardial deformation by doppler strain rate echocardiography in humans: validation against three-dimensional tagged magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002;106:50–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gottdiener JS, Bednarz J, Devereux R, et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for use of echocardiography in clinical trials. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17:1086–119.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1-39.e14.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Claus P, D’hooge J, Langeland TM, et al. SPEQLE (Software package for echocardiographic quantification LEuven) an integrated approach to ultrasound-based cardiac deformation quantification. Computers in Cardiology [Internet]. Memphis, TN, USA: IEEE; 2002 [cited 2023 Apr 26]. p. 69–72. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1166709/

Sun JP, Popović ZB, Greenberg NL, et al. Noninvasive quantification of regional myocardial function using Doppler-derived velocity, displacement, strain rate, and strain in healthy volunteers: effects of aging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17:132–8.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:111–88.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park J-H, Marwick TH. Use and limitations of E/e’ to assess left ventricular filling pressure by echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2011;19:169.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sengupta PP, Korinek J, Belohlavek M, et al. Left ventricular structure and function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1988–2001.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Voigt J. Incidence and characteristics of segmental postsystolic longitudinal shortening in normal, acutely ischemic, and scarred myocardium. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:415–23.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chirinos JA, Segers P, Rietzschel ER, et al. Early and late systolic wall stress differentially relate to myocardial contraction and relaxation in middle-aged adults: the asklepios study. Hypertension. 2013;61:296–303.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chirinos JA, Kips JG, Jacobs DR, et al. Arterial wave reflections and incident cardiovascular events and heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2170–7.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yuan S, Kongstad O, Hertervig E, et al. Global repolarization sequence of the ventricular endocardium: monophasic action potential mapping in swine and humans. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24:1479–88.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferreira-Martins J, Leite-Moreira AF. Physiologic basis and pathophysiologic implications of the diastolic properties of the cardiac muscle. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:1–12.

Google Scholar 

LeWinter MM, Fabian J, Bell SP. Left ventricular restoring forces: modulation by heart rate and contractility. Basic Res Cardiol. 1998;93:s143–7.

Google Scholar 

Cho M-J, Lee J-W, Lee J, et al. Evaluation of early left ventricular dysfunction in patients with duchenne muscular dystrophy using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography and tissue doppler imaging. Pediatr Cardiol. 2018;39:1614–9.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moon J. Gadolinium enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Anderson-Fabry disease evidence for a disease specific abnormality of the myocardial interstitium. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:2151–5.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mertens L, Ganame J, Claus P, et al. Early regional myocardial dysfunction in young patients with duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:1049–54.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yatabe S, Kumada T, Hiro T, et al. The effect of left ventricular wall motion during isovolumetric relaxation period in coronary artery disease. Jpn Circ J. 1989;53:766–72.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nesto RW, Kowalchuk GJ. The ischemic cascade: temporal sequence of hemodynamic, electrocardiographic and symptomatic expressions of ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:C23-30.

Google Scholar 

Aroesty JM, McKay RG, Heller GV, et al. Simultaneous assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction during pacing-induced ischemia. Circulation. 1985;71:889–900.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abraham TP, Dimaano VL, Liang H-Y. Role of tissue doppler and strain echocardiography in current clinical practice. Circulation. 2007;116:2597–609.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferferieva V, Van Den Bergh A, Claus P, et al. Assessment of strain and strain rate by two-dimensional speckle tracking in mice: comparison with tissue Doppler echocardiography and conductance catheter measurements. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14:765–73.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Orlowska M, Ramalli A, Petrescu A, et al. A novel 2-D speckle tracking method for high-frame-rate echocardiography. IEEE Trans Ultrason, Ferroelect, Freq Contr. 2020;67:1764–75.

Google Scholar 

Papangelopoulou K, Orlowska M, Bezy S, et al. Validation of novel biomarkers to assess cardiac diastolic function extracted using a high frame rate speckle tracking algorithm. 2021 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) [Internet]. Xi’an, China: IEEE; 2021 [cited 2023 May 2]. p. 1–4. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9593478/

Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, et al. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:1503–10.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar