Der Standard: Kinder-Sexpuppen bei Amazon in Frankreich angeboten. 2020. https://www.derstandard.de/story/2000119407188/kinder-sexpuppen-bei-amazon-in-frankreich-angeboten.

Döring N, Mohseni MR, Walter R. Design, use, and effects of sex dolls and sex robots: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e18551.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harper CA, Lievesley R. Exploring the ownership of child-like sex dolls. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51:4141–56.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Desbuleux JC, Fuss J. Is the anthropomorphization of sex dolls associated with objectification and hostility toward women? A mixed method study among doll users. J Sex Res. 2023;60:206–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Valverde S. The modern sex doll owner: a descriptive analysis. Master Thesis. California Polytechnic State University; 2012.

Desbuleux JC, Fuss J. Konsequenzen des Verbots von Sexpuppen mit kindlichem Erscheinungsbild für Betroffene. Eine qualitative Analyse. Z für Sex. 2024;37:69–79.

Google Scholar 

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

Seto MC. Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41:231–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jahnke S, Hoyer J. Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: a blind spot in stigma research. Int J Sex Health. 2013;25:169–84.

Article  Google Scholar 

Harper CA, Lievesley R, Wanless K. Exploring the psychological characteristics and risk-related cognitions of individuals who own sex dolls. J Sex Res. 2023;60:190–205.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brown R, Shelling J. Exploring the implications of child sex dolls. In: Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice. Australian Institute of Criminology. 2019. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi570. Accessed 4 Sep 2024.

Chatterjee BB. Child sex dolls and robots: cenging the boundaries of the child protection framework. International review of law. Comput Technol. 2020;34:22–43.

Google Scholar 

Richardson K. The asymmetrical ‘relationship’ parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots. ACM SIGCAS Comput Soc. 2016;45:290–3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Richardson K. Sex robot matters: slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines. IEEE Technol Soc Mag. 2016;35:46–53.

Article  Google Scholar 

Samji K, Vasquez EA. The link between myths about sexual aggression and sexual objectification via hostile attitudes toward women. J Sex Aggress. 2020;26:385–93.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vasquez EA, Ball L, Loughnan S, Pina A. The object of my aggression: sexual objectification increases physical aggression toward women. Aggress Behav. 2018;44:5–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

CampaignAgainstSexRobots. The materialisation of infant abuse in dolls and robots. 2024. https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/the-materialisation-of-infant-abuse/.

CONGRESS.GOV: 118th Congress H.R.2877. 2023. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/2877/text?s=1&r=10.

Deutscher Bundestag: Plenarprotokoll Stenografischer Bericht. 2021. https://dserver.bundestag.de/btp/19/19218.pdf.

Rutkin A. New scientist: could sex robots and virtual reality treat paedophilia? 2016. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2099607-could-sex-robots-and-virtual-reality-treat-paedophilia/.

Ferguson CJ, Hartley RD. The pleasure is momentary the expense damnable? The influence of pornography on rape and sexual assault. Aggress Violent Behav. 2009;14:323–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ferguson CJ, Hartley RD. Pornography and sexual aggression: can meta-analysis find a link? Trauma Violence Abus. 2022;23:278–87.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mestre-Bach G, Villena-Moya A, Chiclana-Actis C. Pornography use and violence: a systematic review of the last 20 years. Trauma Violence Abus. 2024;25:1088–112.

Article  Google Scholar 

Diamond M, Jozifkova E, Weiss P. Pornography and sex crimes in the Czech Republic. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40:1037–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Strikwerda L. Legal and moral implications of child sex robots. In: Danaher J, McArthur N, editors. Robot sex. Social and ethical implications. 1st ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2017. pp 133–52.

Cantor JM. Sexology today: do child sex dolls count as child porn? Should they? 2017. http://www.sexologytoday.org/2017/02/canada-and-australia-now-have-both.html.

Langcaster-James M, Bentley G. Beyond the sex doll: post-human companionship and the rise of the ‘Allodoll’. Robotics. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics7040062.

Knafo D. Guys and dolls: Relational life in the technological era. Psychoanal Dialog. 2015;25:481–502.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moorman EL, Samuel DB. Representing schizotypal thinking with dimensional traits: a case for the five factor schizotypal inventory. Psychol Assess. 2018;30:19–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Danaher J. Regulating child sex robots: restriction or experimentation? Med Law Rev. 2019;27:553–75.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Danaher J. Robotic rape and robotic child sexual abuse: should they be criminalised? Crim Law Philos. 2017;11:71–95.

Article  Google Scholar 

Harper CA, Lievesley R. Sex doll ownership: an agenda for research. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020;22:1–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wissenschaftlicher Dienst des Deutschen Bundestags: Die rechtliche Regulierung kinderähnlicher Sexpuppen. 2020. https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/791508/4b5cfe718d24bd111e81a039203bce8a/WD-7-072-20-pdf.pdf.

Loibl E, van der Aa S. Criminalization of childlike sex dolls under international and EU law. Eur J Crime, Crim Law Crim Justice. 2023;31:217–42.

Article  Google Scholar 

Loibl E, van der Aa S, Hendriks-Lundh M, Niemark R. Exploring different national approaches to prohibiting childlike sex dolls. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law. 2023;30:63–82.

Article  Google Scholar 

CPS. Sex dolls childlike. 2022. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/sex-dolls-childlike.

Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-26.html#docCont.

CNA. South Korea allows import of sex dolls as private matter. 2022. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/south-korea-allows-import-sex-dolls-private-matter-government-private-life-3168396.

Desbuleux JC, Fuss J. The self-reported sexual real-world consequences of sex doll use. J Sex Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2199727.

Yasuyama T, Ohi K, Shimada T, Uehara T, Kawasaki Y. Differences in social functioning among patients with major psychiatric disorders: interpersonal communication is impaired in patients with schizophrenia and correlates with an increase in schizotypal traits. Psychiatry Res. 2017;249:30–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Benning SD, Patrick CJ, Hicks BM, Blonigen DM, Krueger RF. Factor structure of the psychopathic personality inventory: validity and implications for clinical assessment. Psychol Assess. 2003;15:340–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seto MC. The motivation-facilitation model of sexual offending. Sex Abus. 2019;31:3–24.

Article  Google Scholar 

Venables N, Hall J, Patrick C. Differentiating psychopathy from antisocial personality disorder: a triarchic model perspective. Psychol Med. 2014;44:1005–13.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scherner G, Amelung T, Schuler M, Grundmann D, Beier KM. Pädophilie und Hebephilie. In: Beier KM, editor. Pädophilie, Hebephilie und sexueller Kindesmissbrauch. 1st ed. Wiesbaden: Springer; 2018. pp. 1–14.

Dartnall E, Jewkes R. Sexual violence against women: the scope of the problem. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:3–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beier KM. Differential typology and prognosis for dissexual behavior – a follow-up study of previously expert-appraised child molesters. Int J Leg Med. 1998;111:133–41.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Seto MC (editor). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: theory, assessment, and intervention. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2018.

Kein Täter werden: Ablauf und Ziele. 2024. https://www.kein-taeter-werden.de/betroffene/.

König A. Über 15 Jahre „Kein Täter werden “–mehr Schaden als Nutzen? Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol. 2023;17:389–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nentzl J, Scherner G. Therapiebeginn, dropout und follow-up–Untersuchungen im Präventionsprojekt Dunkelfeld. Sexuologie. 2021;28:249–58.

Article  Google Scholar 

Schmucker M, Lösel F. Does sexual offender treatment work? A systematic review of outcome evaluations. Psicothema. 2008;20:10–19.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lievesley R, Harper CA, Woodward E, Tenbergen G. Fantasy sexual material use by people with attractions to children. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023;25:395–404.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Appel JM. Unconventional harm reduction interventions for minor-attracted persons. Clin Ethics. 2023;18:183–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Leslie KM. Harm reduction. An approach to reducing risky health behaviours in adolescents. Paediatr Child Health. 2008;13:53–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ritter A, Cameron J. A review of the effic