Kolena B, Hlisníková H, Nagyová M, Orendáčová K, Vondráková M, Petrovičová I, et al. Endocrine effect of phthalate metabolites and a butterfly effect of prenatal exposure to androgens on qualitative aspects of female sexual response- an initial survey. Int J Impot Res. 2024;2024:1–9.

Google Scholar 

Hart R, Doherty DA, Frederiksen H, Keelan JA, Hickey M, Sloboda D, et al. The influence of antenatal exposure to phthalates on subsequent female reproductive development in adolescence: a pilot study. Reproduction. 2014;147:379–90.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Téllez-Rojo MM, Cantoral A, Cantonwine DE, Schnaas L, Peterson K, Hu H, et al. Prenatal urinary phthalate metabolites levels and neurodevelopment in children at two and three years of age. Sci Total Environ. 2013;461–462:386–90.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Watkins DJ, Téllez-Rojo MM, Ferguson KK, Lee JM, Solano-Gonzalez M, Blank-Goldenberg C, et al. In utero and peripubertal exposure to phthalates and BPA in relation to female sexual maturation. Environ Res. 2014;134:233–41.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abdallah S, Jampy A, Moison D, Wieckowski M, Messiaen S, Martini E, et al. Foetal exposure to the bisphenols BADGE and BPAF impairs meiosis through DNA oxidation in mouse ovaries. Environ Pollut. 2023;317:120791.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jannini EA, Burri A, Jern P, Novelli G. Genetics of human sexual behavior: where we are, where we are going. Sex Med Rev. 2015;3:65–77.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hlisníková H, Petrovičová I, Kolena B, Šidlovská M, Sirotkin A. Effects and mechanisms of phthalates’ action on reproductive processes and reproductive health: a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1–37.

Article  Google Scholar 

Van Stein KR, Strauß B, Brenk-Franz K. Ovulatory shifts in sexual desire but not mate preferences: an LH-test-confirmed, longitudinal study. Evolut Psychol. 2019;17:1474704919848116.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mollaioli D, Di Sante S, Limoncin E, Ciocca G, Gravina GL, Maseroli E, et al. Validation of a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: the orgasmometer-F. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0202076.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hönekopp J, Watson S. Meta-analysis of digit ratio 2D:4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand. Am J Hum Biol. 2010;22:619–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Manning JT, Fink B, Trivers R. Digit Ratio (2D:4D; Right-Left 2D:4D) and multiple phenotypes for same-sex attraction: the BBC internet study revisited. Arch Sex Behav. 2024;53:213–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Manning JT, Fink B. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and aggregate personality scores across nations: Data from the BBC internet study. Pers Individ Dif. 2011;51:387–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Swan SH, Sathyanarayana S, Barrett ES, Janssen S, Liu F, Nguyen RH, et al. First trimester phthalate exposure and anogenital distance in newborns. Human Reprod. 2015;30:963–72.

Article  Google Scholar 

Toprak T, Şahin A, Akgul K, Kutluhan MA, Ramazanoglu MA, Yilmaz M, et al. The relationship between anogenital distance and lifelong premature ejaculation. Andrology. 2020;8:353–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee D, Kim TH, Lee HH, Kim JM, Jeon DS, Kim YS, et al. A pilot study of the impacts of menopause on the anogenital distance. J Menopausal Med. 2015;21:41.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar