Exploration of different statistical approaches in the comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock: SOAP II

De Backer D, Aldecoa C, Njimi H, Vincent JL. Dopamine versus norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock: a meta-analysis*. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(3):725–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823778ee.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Rui Q, Jiang Y, Chen M, Zhang N, Yang H, Zhou Y. Dopamine versus norepinephrine in the treatment of cardiogenic shock: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(43):e8402. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008402.PMID:29069037;PMCID:PMC5671870.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, Brasseur A, Defrance P, Gottignies P, Vincent JL, SOAP II Investigators. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):779–89. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0907118.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pocock SJ, Ariti CA, Collier TJ, Wang D. The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(2):176–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr352.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zampieri FG, Casey JD, Shankar-Hari M, Harrell FE Jr, Harhay MO. Using bayesian methods to augment the interpretation of critical care trials. An overview of theory and example reanalysis of the alveolar recruitment for acute respiratory distress syndrome trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203(5):543–52. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202006-2381CP.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kent DM, Paulus JK, van Klaveren D, D’Agostino R, Goodman S, Hayward R, Ioannidis JPA, Patrick-Lake B, Morton S, Pencina M, Raman G, Ross JS, Selker HP, Varadhan R, Vickers A, Wong JB, Steyerberg EW. The predictive approaches to treatment effect heterogeneity (PATH) statement. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(1):35–45. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-3667.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zampieri FG, Damiani LP, Bagshaw SM, Semler MW, Churpek M, Azevedo LCP, Figueiredo RC, Veiga VC, Biondi R, Freitas FR, Machado FR, Cavalcanti AB, BRICNet. Conditional treatment effect analysis of two infusion rates for fluid challenges in critically ill patients: a secondary analysis of balanced solution versus saline in intensive care study (BaSICS) trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023;20(6):872–9. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202211-946OC.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Buyse M. Generalized pairwise comparisons of prioritized outcomes in the two-sample problem. Stat Med. 2010;29:3245–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3923.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nattino G, Finazzi S, Bertolini G, Rossi C, Carrara G. givitiR: the GiViTI calibration test and belt. R package version 1.3, 2017. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=givitiR. Accessed 30 Mar 2024.

Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–29.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European society of intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709751.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bürkner PC. brms: an R package for bayesian multilevel models using stan. J Stat Softw. 2017;80(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01.

Article  Google Scholar 

Arel-Bundock V. marginaleffects: predictions, comparisons, slopes, marginal means, and hypothesis tests. R package version 0.18.0, 2024. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=marginaleffects. Accessed 30 Mar 2024.

Ramanan M, Myburgh J, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Venkatesh B. Publication of secondary analyses from randomized trials in critical care. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(21):2105–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1610367.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gelman A, Carlin J. Beyond power calculations: assessing type S (sign) and type M (magnitude) errors. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014;9(6):641–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andersen-Ranberg NC, Poulsen LM, Perner A, Hästbacka J, Morgan M, Citerio G, Collet MO, Weber SO, Andreasen AS, Bestle M, Uslu B, Pedersen HS, Nielsen LG, Damgaard K, Jensen TB, Sommer T, Dey N, Mathiesen O, Granholm A. Haloperidol versus placebo for the treatment of delirium in ICU patients: a pre-planned, secondary Bayesian analysis of the AID-ICU trial. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(4):411–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07024-9.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zampieri FG, Serpa-Neto A, Wald R, Bellomo R, Bagshaw SM, STARRT-AKI and RENAL Investigators. Hierarchical endpoints in critical care: a post-hoc exploratory analysis of the standard versus accelerated initiation of renal-replacement therapy in acute kidney injury and the intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients trials. J Crit Care. 2024;9(82):154767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154767.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

de Grooth HJ, Cremer OL. Bayes and the evidence base: reanalyzing trials using many priors does not contribute to consensus. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024;209(5):483–4. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202308-1455VP.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Hylander Møller M, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):e1063–143. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel GP, Grahe JS, Sperry M, Singla S, Elpern E, Lateef O, Balk RA. Efficacy and safety of dopamine versus norepinephrine in the management of septic shock. Shock. 2010;33(4):375–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181c6ba6f.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine SA. Corrigendum to: 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(48):4901. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab670. (Erratum for: Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599–3726).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, Deswal A, Drazner MH, Dunlay SM, Evers LR, Fang JC, Fedson SE, Fonarow GC, Hayek SS, Hernandez AF, Khazanie P, Kittleson MM, Lee CS, Link MS, Milano CA, Nnacheta LC, Sandhu AT, Stevenson LW, Vardeny O, Vest AR, Yancy CW. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(18):e895–1032. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063. (Erratum in: Circulation. 2022 May 3;145(18):e1033. Erratum in: Circulation. 2022 Sep 27;146(13):e185. Erratum in: Circulation. 2023 Apr 4;147(14):e674).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Møller JE, Engstrøm T, Jensen LO, Eiskjær H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schäfer A, Werner N, Frydland M, Holmvang L, Kjærgaard J, Sørensen R, Lønborg J, Lindholm MG, Udesen NLJ, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Christiansen EH, Linke A, Woitek FJ, Westenfeld R, Möbius-Winkler S, Wachtell K, Ravn HB, Lassen JF, Boesgaard S, Gerke O, Hassager C. Microaxial flow pump or standard care in infarct-related cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(15):1382–93. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2312572.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif