McGorry PD, Hartmann JA, Spooner R, Nelson B (2018) Beyond the “at risk mental state” concept: transitioning to transdiagnostic psychiatry. World Psychiatry 17:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20514

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fusar-Poli P, Rutigliano G, Stahl D et al (2017) Long-term validity of the at risk mental state (ARMS) for predicting psychotic and non-psychotic mental disorders. Eur Psychiatry 42:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.11.010

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McGlashan TH (1998) Early detection and intervention of schizophrenia: rationale and research. Br J Psychiatry 172:3–6

CAS  Google Scholar 

McGlashan TH (2001) Psychosis treatment prior to psychosis onset: ethical issues. Schizophr Res 51:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00238-9

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Rosen JL et al (2003) Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophr Bull 29:703–715. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007040

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yung AR, Yung AR, Pan Yuen H et al (2005) Mapping the onset of psychosis: the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental states. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 39:964–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01714.x

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gross G, Huber G, Klosterkötter J, Linz M (1987) BSABS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Google Scholar 

Schultze-Lutter F, Ruhrmann S, Picker H, Klosterkötter J (2006) Development and evaluation of the schizophrenia proneness instrument, adult version (SPI-A). Schizophr Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(06)70014-7

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Daneault J-G, Stip E (2013) Genealogy of instruments for prodrome evaluation of psychosis. Front Psychiatry 4:25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00025

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Haroun N, Dunn L, Haroun A, Cadenhead KS (2006) Risk and protection in prodromal schizophrenia: ethical implications for clinical practice and future research. Schizophr Bull 32:166–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbj007

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ising HK, Veling W, Loewy RL et al (2012) The validity of the 16-item version of the prodromal questionnaire (PQ-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population. Schizophr Bull 38:1288–1296. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs068

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McDonald M, Christoforidou E, Van Rijsbergen N et al (2019) Using online screening in the general population to detect participants at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Schizophr Bull 45:600–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby069

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Radez J, Waite F, Izon E, Johns L (2023) Identifying individuals at risk of developing psychosis: a systematic review of the literature in primary care services. Early Interv Psychiatry 17:429–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13365

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Clemmensen L, Kristensen TD, Wenneberg C et al (2023) Brief rapport: perceptual aberration in patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13445

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fonseca-Pedrero E, Ortuño-Sierra J, Inchausti F et al (2020) Beyond clinical high-risk state for psychosis: the network structure of multidimensional psychosis liability in adolescents. Front Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00967

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gawęda Ł, Pionke R, Hartmann J et al (2020) Toward a complex network of risks for psychosis: combining trauma, cognitive biases, depression, and psychotic-like experiences on a large sample of young adults. Schizophr Bull 47:395–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa125

PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lo Buglio G, Pontillo M, Cerasti E et al (2022) A network analysis of anxiety, depressive, and psychotic symptoms and functioning in children and adolescents at clinical high risk for psychosis. Front Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1016154

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abplanalp SJ, Braff DL, Light GA et al (2022) Understanding connections and boundaries between positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and role functioning among individuals with schizophrenia: a network psychometric approach. JAMA Psychiat 79:1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.2386

Google Scholar 

Abplanalp SJ, Green MF (2022) Symptom structure in schizophrenia: implications of latent variable modeling vs network analysis. Schizophr Bull 48:538–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbac020

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Isvoranu A-M, Guloksuz S, Epskamp S et al (2020) Toward incorporating genetic risk scores into symptom networks of psychosis. Psychol Med 50:636–643. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171900045X

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Piao YH, Yun J-Y, Nguyen TB et al (2022) Longitudinal symptom network structure in first-episode psychosis: a possible marker for remission. Psychol Med 52:3193–3201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720005280

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Isvoranu A-M, van Borkulo CD, Boyette L-L et al (2017) A network approach to psychosis: pathways between childhood trauma and psychotic symptoms. Schizophr Bull 43:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw055

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ong HL, Isvoranu A-M, Schirmbeck F et al (2021) Obsessive-compulsive symptoms and other symptoms of the at-risk mental state for psychosis: a network perspective. Schizophr Bull 47:1018–1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa187

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van der Tuin S, Balafas SE, Oldehinkel AJ et al (2022) Dynamic symptom networks across different at-risk stages for psychosis: an individual and transdiagnostic perspective. Schizophr Res 239:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2021.11.018

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wüsten C, Schlier B, Jaya ES et al (2018) Psychotic experiences and related distress: a cross-national comparison and network analysis based on 7141 participants from 13 countries. Schizophr Bull 44:1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby087

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schmidt A, Hauke DJ, Das T et al (2019) Increased symptom consolidation preceding transition to psychosis: a phenomenological network study. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3429923

Google Scholar 

Armando M, Schneider M, Pontillo M et al (2017) No age effect in the prevalence and clinical significance of ultra-high risk symptoms and criteria for psychosis in 22q11 deletion syndrome: confirmation of the genetically driven risk for psychosis? PLoS ONE 12:e0174797. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174797

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jimeno N, Gomez-Pilar J, Poza J et al (2020) Main symptomatic treatment targets in suspected and early psychosis: new insights from network analysis. Schizophr Bull 46:884–895. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbz140

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Loewy RL, Bearden CE, Johnson JK et al (2005) The prodromal questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes. Schizophr Res 79:117–125

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raine A (1991) The SPQ: a scale for the assessment of schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R criteria. Schizophr Bull 17:555–564. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/17.4.555

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lejuste F, Pedron L, Bonnard E et al (2021) Validation d’une version française du 16-items prodromal questionnaire (fPQ16) chez des adolescents et jeunes adultes consultant en psychiatrie. L’Encéphale 47:547–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2020.11.009

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spillebout C, Pelluet A, Bioulac S et al (2023) Detection of clinical high risk for psychosis in child and adolescent mental health services: validation of the first step with the French versions of the prodromal questionnaire (fPQ-16) and scale of perceptual and cognitive aberrations (fPCA). Early Interv Psychiatry 17:708–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13366

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burger J, Isvoranu A-M, Lunansky G et al (2022) Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data. Psychol Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000471

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Howie C, Hanna D, Shannon C et al (2022) The Structure of the Prodromal Questionnaire-16 (PQ-16): Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in a general non-help-seeking population sample. Early Interv Psychiatry 16:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13147

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, van der Maas HLJ, Borsboom D (2010) Comorbidity: a network perspective. Behav Brain Sci 33:137–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09991567

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Epskamp S, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ et al (2012) qgraph: network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J Stat Soft 48:1–18

Google Scholar 

van Borkulo CD, van Bork R, Boschloo L et al (2022) Comparing network structures on three aspects: a permutation test. Psychol Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000476