Improving Clarity and Interpretability of Items in a Bilingual Index of Propensity to Integrate Research Evidence into Clinical Decision-Making in Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose: To contribute evidence for the clarity and interpretability of a new five-item bilingual multidimensional index of a rehabilitation clinician's propensity to integrate research evidence into clinical decision-making. Methods: This study was conducted in three sequential steps: (1) We conducted a focus group with occupational therapists, physical therapists, and researchers to review the items and response options for clarity, consistency, and interval properties and agree on equivalency in English and French. (2) We conducted cognitive interviews whereby clinicians elaborated on their interpretation of the item, comprehensibility of items, and appropriateness of response options. Accepted modifications were integrated and tested with subsequent participants. (3) We conducted an online survey to validate the English and French equivalency of response options on a 0 to 100 scale. Results: During the qualitative revision process (one focus group with 7 participants followed by 27 interviews), the index was revised 12 times with substantial modifications to the use of research evidence and attitudes items. Conclusion: This research increases the clinical relevance and reduces measurement error of this brief index which can inform on individual or organizational factors influencing a clinician's propensity of integrating research evidence into decision-making and ultimately, improve rehabilitation outcomes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant number 148544).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Institutional Review Board at McGill University gave ethical approval for all phases of this study before commencement and recruitment.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced or analyzed in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif