Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Colombo A, et al. Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Circulation. 2010;121:2645–53.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC, Ahn JM, Song HG, et al. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1718–27.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stone GW, Sabik JF, Serruys PW, Simonton CA, Généreux P, Puskas J, et al. Everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2223–35.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stone GW, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, Pocock SJ, Morice MC, Puskas J, et al. Five-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1820–30.
Mäkikallio T, Holm NR, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IB, et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2743–52.
Holm NR, Mäkikallio T, Lindsay MM, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IBA, et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial. Lancet. 2020;395:191–9.
Ahmad Y, Howard JP, Arnold AD, Cook CM, Prasad M, Ali ZA, et al. Mortality after drug-eluting stents vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:3228–35.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sabatine MS, Bergmark BA, Murphy SA, O’Gara PT, Smith PK, Serruys PW, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2021;398:2247–57.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Park S, Park SJ, Park DW. Percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: present status and future perspectives. JACC Asia. 2022;2:119–38.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kawase Y, Matsuo H, Kuramitsu S, Shiono Y, Akasaka T, Tanaka N, et al. Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022;37:425–39.
Escaned J, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Shabbir A, Collet C, Lee JM, et al. Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2023;19:464–81.
Saito Y, Kobayashi Y, Fujii K, Sonoda S, Tsujita K, Hibi K, et al. CVIT 2023 clinical expert consensus document on intravascular ultrasound. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024;39:1–14.
Kurogi K, Ishii M, Yamamoto N, Yamanaga K, Tsujita K. Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a review of current clinical applications. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021;36:169–77.
Warisawa T, Cook CM, Ahmad Y, Howard JP, Seligman H, Rajkumar C, et al. Deferred vs. performed revascularization for left main coronary disease with hemodynamic significance. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16: e012700.
Kwon W, Lee JM, Yun KH, Choi KH, Lee SJ, Lee JY, et al. Clinical benefit of intravascular imaging compared with conventional angiography in left main coronary artery intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16: e013359.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:e21–129.
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:87–165.
Nakamura M, Yaku H, Ako J, Arai H, Asai T, Chikamori T, et al. JCS/JSCVS 2018 guideline on revascularization of stable coronary artery disease. Circ J. 2022;86:477–588.
Byrne RA, Fremes S, Capodanno D, Czerny M, Doenst T, Emberson JR, et al. 2022 Joint ESC/EACTS review of the 2018 guideline recommendations on the revascularization of left main coronary artery disease in patients at low surgical risk and anatomy suitable for PCI or CABG. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:4310–20.
Kinnaird T, Gallagher S, Farooq V, Protty M, Back L, Devlin P, et al. Temporal trends in in-hospital outcomes following unprotected left-main percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis of 14,522 cases from british cardiovascular intervention society database 2009 to 2017. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16: e012350.
Mohammad MA, Persson J, Buccheri S, Odenstedt J, Sarno G, Angerås O, et al. Trends in clinical practice and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11: e024040.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Davidson LJ, Cleveland JC, Welt FG, Anwaruddin S, Bonow RO, Firstenberg MS, et al. A practical approach to left main coronary artery disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80:2119–34.
Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Gaudino M. Left main coronary disease: evolving management concepts. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:4635–43.
Park S, Park SJ, Park DW. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization of left main coronary artery disease. Korean Circ J. 2023;53:113–33.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nakano S, Kohsaka S, Chikamori T, Fukushima K, Kobayashi Y, Kozuma K, et al. JCS 2022 guideline focused update on diagnosis and treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circ J. 2022;86:882–915.
Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Shim EB, Kim YT, Yun SC, et al. Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2012;5:1029–36.
Warisawa T, Cook CM, Rajkumar C, Howard JP, Seligman H, Ahmad Y, et al. Safety of revascularization deferral of left main stenosis based on instantaneous wave-free ratio evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2020;13:1655–64.
Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, de Muinck ED, Hoorntje JC, Escaned J, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2001;103:2928–34.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–24.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.
Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, et al. Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1824–34.
Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1813–23.
留言 (0)