Comment on: Efficacy and safety of two disposable circumcision suture devices for circumcision in adults: a prospective comparative multicenter study

Bocchino AC, Fernández-Pascual E, Toribio-Vázquez C, Manfredi C, Urdaneta G, Balmori C, et al. Efficacy and safety of two disposable circumcision suture devices for circumcision in adults: a prospective comparative multicenter study. Int J Impot Res. 2024: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00933-3.

Hohlfeld AS, Ebrahim S, Zaki Shaik M, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3:CD012250.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al Hussein Alawamlh O, Kim SJ, Li PS, Lee RK. Novel devices for adolescent and adult male circumcision. Eur Urol focus. 2018;4:329.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jin XD, Lu JJ, Liu WH, Zhou J, Yu RK, Yu B, et al. Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015;48:577.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mavhu W, Hatzold K, Ncube G, Xaba S, Madidi N, Keatinge J, et al. Safety and acceptability of the PrePex device when used in routine male circumcision service delivery during active surveillance in Zimbabwe. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72:S63.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif