Efficacy comparison of high-genetic barrier nucleos(t)ide analogues in treatment-na

2. Yuen MF, Chen DS, Dusheiko GM, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018;4:18035.
pmid
3. Chen CJ, Iloeje UH, Yang HI. Long-term outcomes in hepatitis B: the REVEAL-HBV study. Clin Liver Dis 2007;11:797–816viii.
crossref pmid
4. Sarin SK, Kumar M, Lau GK, et al. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int 2016;10:1–98.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 2017;67:370–398.
crossref pmid
6. Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology 2018;67:1560–1599.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL). KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022;28:276–331.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Ahn SH, Kim W, Jung YK, et al. Efficacy and safety of besifovir dipivoxil maleate compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17:1850–1859e4.
crossref pmid
9. Park JW, Kwak KM, Kim SE, et al. Comparison of the long-term efficacy between entecavir and tenofovir in treatmentnaïve chronic hepatitis B patients. BMC Gastroenterol 2017;17:39.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10. Wu IT, Hu TH, Hung CH, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of entecavir and tenofovir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B patients with high viraemia: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23:464–469.
crossref pmid
11. Chen MB, Wang H, Zheng QH, et al. Comparative efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019;14:e0224773.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Ma X, Liu S, Wang M, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir: which is the most effective drug for chronic hepatitis B? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2021;9:335–344.
crossref
13. Zuo SR, Zuo XC, Wang CJ, et al. A meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of entecavir and tenofovir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. J Clin Pharmacol 2015;55:288–297.
crossref pmid
14. Han Y, Zeng A, Liao H, Liu Y, Chen Y, Ding H. The efficacy and safety comparison between tenofovir and entecavir in treatment of chronic hepatitis B and HBV related cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol 2017;42:168–175.
crossref pmid
15. Jeong J, Shin JW, Jung SW, Park EJ, Park NH. Tenofovir alafenamide treatment may not worsen the lipid profile of chronic hepatitis B patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022;28:254–264.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
16. Yuen MF, Ahn SH, Lee KS, et al. Two-year treatment outcome of chronic hepatitis B infection treated with besifovir vs. entecavir: results from a multicentre study. J Hepatol 2015;62:526–532.
crossref pmid
17. Jansen JP, Trikalinos T, Cappelleri JC, et al. Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. Value Health 2014;17:157–173.
crossref pmid
18. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Higgins JP, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods 2012;3:98–110.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
21. Cai D, Pan C, Yu W, et al. Comparison of the long-term efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B: a large, multicentre, randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e13983.
pmid pmc
22. Zhao Y, Li Y, Qi L, Zhao C. Antiviral curative effects of tenofovir and entecavir in treatment of aged patients with chronic hepatitis B and their regulation on inflammation factors. J Jilin Univ 2019;45:117–122. 23. Koike K, Suyama K, Ito H, Itoh H, Sugiura W. Randomized prospective study showing the non-inferiority of tenofovir to entecavir in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. Hepatol Res 2018;48:59–68.
crossref pmid pdf
24. Sriprayoon T, Mahidol C, Ungtrakul T, et al. Efficacy and safety of entecavir versus tenofovir treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatol Res 2017;47:E161–E168.
pmid
25. Zhang D, Li S, Lu W, Ma P. Clinical efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis b infection in patients naïve to nucleosides and their analogues therapy. Int J Clin Exp Med 2017;10:12329–12335. 26. Lai CL, Ahn SH, Lee KS, et al. Phase IIb multicentred randomised trial of besifovir (LB80380) versus entecavir in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gut 2014;63:996–1004.
crossref pmid
27. Jung CY, Kim HW, Lee JI, et al. Similar risk of kidney function decline between tenofovir alafenamide and besifovir dipivoxil maleate in chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int 2022;42:2408–2417.
crossref pmid pdf
28. Lim J, Choi WM, Shim JH, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int 2022;42:1517–1527.
crossref pmid pdf
29. Yang S, Ma X, Cai C, Wang H, Xiao F, Yu C. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is superior to entecavir in reducing hepatitis B surface antigen for chronic hepatitis B in China: 2-year comprehensive comparative result of a matched comparative study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:637126.
crossref pmid pmc
30. Lee SW, Kwon JH, Lee HL, et al. Comparison of tenofovir and entecavir on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B in Korea: a large-scale, propensity score analysis. Gut 2020;69:1301–1308.
crossref pmid pmc
31. Yip TC, Wong VW, Chan HL, Tse YK, Lui GC, Wong GL. Tenofovir is associated with lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma than entecavir in patients with chronic HBV infection in China. Gastroenterology 2020;158:215–225e6.
crossref pmid
32. Choi J, Kim HJ, Lee J, Cho S, Ko MJ, Lim YS. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients treated with entecavir vs tenofovir for chronic hepatitis B: a Korean nationwide cohort study. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:30–36.
crossref pmid
33. Shin JW, Jeong J, Jung SW, et al. Comparable incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir. Dig Dis Sci 2021;66:1739–1750.
crossref pmid pdf
34. Kim SU, Seo YS, Lee HA, et al. A multicenter study of entecavir vs. tenofovir on prognosis of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B in South Korea. J Hepatol 2019;71:456–464.
crossref pmid
35. Wong WWL, Pechivanoglou P, Wong J, et al. Antiviral treatment for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Syst Rev 2019;8:207.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
36. Con D, Goodwin T, Majeed A, Roberts S, Kemp W. Comparison of 48-week efficacy of tenofovir vs entecavir for patients with chronic hepatitis B: a network meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat 2021;28:40–50.
crossref pmid pdf
37. Tan YW, Ge GH, Zhao W, et al. YMDD motif mutations in chronic hepatitis B antiviral treatment naïve patients: a multi-center study. Braz J Infect Dis 2012;16:250–255.
crossref pmid
38. Farag MS, Fung S, Tam E, et al. Effectiveness and renal safety of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate among chronic hepatitis B patients: real-world study. J Viral Hepat 2021;28:942–950.
crossref pmid pdf
39. Agarwal K, Brunetto M, Seto WK, et al. 96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 2018;68:672–681.
crossref pmid
40. Buti M, Gane E, Seto WK, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;1:196–206.
crossref pmid
41. Chan HL, Fung S, Seto WK, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;1:185–195.
crossref pmid
42. Boglione L, De Benedetto I, Lupia T, Cusato J, Cariti G, Di Perri G. Serological and virological response in patients with hepatitis B virus genotype E treated with entecavir or tenofovir: a prospective study. Arch Virol 2021;166:1125–1131.
crossref pmid pdf
43. Batirel A, Guclu E, Arslan F, et al. Comparable efficacy of tenofovir versus entecavir and predictors of response in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B: a multicenter real-life study. Int J Infect Dis 2014;28:153–159.
crossref pmid

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif