A 60-year-old male patient presented with persistent palpitations and chest discomfort that was adversely affecting his exercise tolerance for over half a month despite taking oral metoprolol tartrate tablets and rivaroxaban. The patient denied any history of chronic conditions such as diabetes, coronary heart disease, or hypertension. Preoperative assessments revealed that the blood counts, electrolytes, lipid profile, hepatic and renal function, coagulation status, thyroid function, cardiac enzymes, and troponin were all within normal limits, except for a marginally elevated N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptideat 775.9 pg/mL. An electrocardiogram documented rapid atrial fibrillation (AF), specifically, a ventricular rate of 122 beats per minute, confirming the requirement for further medical intervention. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) identified a membranous structure within the left atrium, delineating an accessory and a true left atrial chamber (Fig. 1a, b). Measurements indicated the accessory left atrial chamber was 39 × 32 mm, the true left atrial chamber was 46 × 20 mm, and the communication in the membrane was 20 mm wide. Right atrial dimensions were 49 × 62 mm, and the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 50 mm, with an ejection fraction of 56%.
Fig. 1Images obtained using transthoracic and esophageal ultrasound. A Image obtained using transthoracic ultrasound. B Image obtained using transesophageal ultrasound. A fibromuscular membrane divided the left atrium into accessory and true left atrial chambers. Mem: membrane; AC: accessory chamber; LA: true left atrial chamber; LV: left ventricle; IAS: interatrial septum
In the preoperative cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA), the accessory left atrial chamber was observed to receive drainage from all pulmonary veins (PVs), while the true left atrial chamber enclosed the left atrial appendage (LAA) and mitral annulus (Fig. 2B). A distinct membranous structure was also identified in the left atrium, further delineating the cor triatriatum sinister (CTS) anomaly (Fig. 2B). A three-dimensional reconstruction of the left atrium showed four PVs draining into the paraventriculus and the true atrium containing the left atrial (Fig. 2C, D). The preoperative preparation was thorough, and metoprolol tartrate tablets were discontinued approximately five half-lives prior to the procedure. Continuation of uninterrupted oral rivaroxaban was advised. A detailed model of the left atrial and membranous structure was constructed using ICE (SoundStar; Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) guidance, as illustrated in Fig. 3.
Fig. 2Images obtained using cardiac CTA. A Transverse view of the heart, red solid triangular arrowheads indicate the membrane dividing the left atrium into the accessory and true left atrial chambers. B Coronal view of the heart, red solid triangular arrowheads indicate the membrane dividing the left atrium into the accessory and true left atrial chambers. C, D Three-dimensional reconstruction of the left atrium by CTA. Red solid triangular arrowheads indicate the membrane. Four pulmonary veins drain into the accessory chamber and the true left atrial chamber contains the left atrial appendage (LAA) and mitral annulus. Mem: membrane; AC: accessory chamber; CTA: computed tomography angiography, LA: true left atrial chamber; LAA: left atrial appendage; LSPV: left superior pulmonary vein; LIPV: left inferior pulmonary vein; RSPV: right superior pulmonary vein; RIPV: right superior pulmonary vein
Fig. 3Three-dimensional intracardiac ultrasound modeling image. The pink color indicates the membrane, red hollow triangles indicate the septum entering the accessory chamber, and red solid triangles indicate the septum entering the true left atrial chamber. Mem: membrane; AC: accessory chamber; LA: true left atrial chamber; LAA: left atrial appendage; LSPV: left superior pulmonary vein; LIPV: left inferior pulmonary vein; RSPV: right superior pulmonary vein; RIPV: right superior pulmonary vein
This model facilitated the precise guidance of two atrial septal punctures, enabling the effective delivery of a catheter to the accessory left atrial chamber guided by ICE, and pulmonary venography confirmed that the catheter sheath entered the accessory chamber (Supplementary 1). Further refinement of the left atrial model was achieved using a PentaRay electrode in conjunction with the CARTO3® V7 system (Biosense Webster). The mapping revealed complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs), predominantly recorded in the PV vestibule and near the bottom of the accessory left atrial chamber, specifically adjacent to the membranous structure (Fig. 4). This detailed mapping provided valuable insights into the cardiac structure and electrical activity, crucial for the planning and execution of subsequent procedures. Leveraging the results from the high-density substrate mapping results, an integrated approach using wide-area circumferential ablation and a small box-lesion isolation was undertaken on the posterior wall of the accessory left atrial chamber (Fig. 5). This procedure was facilitated by an STSF catheter (Biosense Webster), which was coupled with the VIZIGO sheath (Biosense Webster) to provide necessary adaptability and precision.
Fig. 4Complex fractionated atrial electrograms on mapping. The mapping revealed complex fractionated atrial electrograms, predominantly recorded in the pulmonary vein vestibule and near the bottom of the accessory left atrial chamber, specifically adjacent to the membranous structure
Fig. 5Results from the high-density substrate mapping results. Leveraging the results from the high-density substrate mapping results, an integrated approach of wide-area circumferential ablation and a small box-lesion isolation was undertaken on the posterior wall of the accessory left atrial chamber
During the PV antrum and small box-lesion ablation (settings on the radiofrequency generator: power 45 W, and flow rate 15 mL/min for the PV antrum ablation; power 40 W, and flow rate 15 mL/min for the small box-lesion ablation; ablation index [AI]: 500 at the posterior wall, 450 at the superior/inferior walls and roof/bottom lines, 350–400 at the posterior wall), a notable shift in cardiac rhythm was observed. The initial AF turned into atypical mitral isthmus-dependent left atrial flutter with a tachycardia cycle length of 234 ms, characterized by an early atrial wave in the distal part of the coronary sinus, a unique pattern depicted in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6Atypical mitral isthmus-dependent left atrial flutter. Atypical mitral isthmus-dependent left atrial flutter with a tachycardia cycle length of 234 ms was characterized by an early atrial wave in the distal part of the coronary sinus
Despite the application of a comprehensive strategy featuring both endocardial and epicardial ablation of the mitral isthmus lines (settings on the radiofrequency generator: power 45 W, and flow rate 15 mL/min for endocardial ablation of the mitral isthmus lines; power 25 W, flow rate 15 mL/min in the distal coronary vein; AI: 500–550 at the mitral isthmus lines, 400 at the distal coronary vein), the persistence of atypical mitral isthmus-dependent left atrial flutter highlighted its resistance to traditional treatment. Consequently, the pattern and perimeter of atrial flutter were noticeably altered after the adoption of vein of Marshall ethanol infusion, which is a widely-used technique for rhythm control. The condition converted to a cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter with a tachycardia cycle length of 228 ms, evidenced by an early atrial wave in the proximal coronary sinus, as depicted in Fig. 7.
Fig. 7Cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter. The cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter with a tachycardia cycle length of 228 ms as evidenced by an early atrial wave in the proximal coronary sinus
Significantly, the linear ablation at the cavo-tricuspid isthmus effectively terminated the cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter (settings on the radiofrequency generator: power 40 W, and flow rate 15 mL/min; AI: 450). Postoperative assessments confirmed the isolation status of the bilateral PVs, the posterior wall of the accessory left atrial chamber, along with bidirectional blockage of both the mitral and cavo-tricuspid isthmus lines (Supplementary 2). ICE surveillance ascertained no pericardial effusion, stable blood pressure, and the absence of surgical complications. The patient was prescribed rabeprazole for at least one month, and rivaroxaban and amiodarone for two months post-operation. Follow-up over six months revealed sustained sinus rhythm and good overall health, and no atrial tachyarrhythmias have recurred.
留言 (0)