Ribeiro R, Kim B (2023) Editorial: Anti-cancer effects of natural products against reproductive cancers. Journal 14:1132795

Google Scholar 

Bergengren O, Pekala KR, Matsoukas K, Fainberg J, Mungovan SF, Bratt O, Bray F, Brawley O, Luckenbaugh AN, Mucci L, Morgan TM, Carlsson SV (2023) 2022 Update on prostate cancer epidemiology and risk factors—a systematic review. Journal 84:191–206

Google Scholar 

Marshall CH, Antonarakis ES (2020) Emerging treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: immunotherapy, PARP inhibitors, and PSMA-targeted approaches. Journal 23:100164

Google Scholar 

Magheli A, Gonzalgo ML, Su LM, Guzzo TJ, Netto G, Humphreys EB, Han M, Partin AW, Pavlovich CP (2011) Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching. Journal 107:1956–1962

Google Scholar 

Das SK, Maji S, Wechman SL, Bhoopathi P, Pradhan AK, Talukdar S, Sarkar D, Landry J, Guo C, Wang XY, Cavenee WK, Emdad L, Fisher PB (2020) MDA-9/Syntenin (SDCBP): novel gene and therapeutic target for cancer metastasis. Journal 155:104695

CAS  Google Scholar 

Burkhardt O, Abt D, Hechelhammer L, Kim O, Omlin A, Schmid HP, Engeler D, Zumstein V, Müllhaupt G (2024) Prostatic artery embolization in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a prospective single center pilot study. Journal 47(6)771–782

Kishimoto N, Takao T, Yamamichi G, Okusa T, Taniguchi A, Tsutahara K, Tanigawa G, Yamaguchi S (2016) Impact of prior abdominal surgery on the outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single center experience. Journal 42:918–924

Google Scholar 

Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Cornford P (2021) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Journal 79:243–262

CAS  Google Scholar 

Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wilderäng U, Thorsteinsdottir T, Lagerkvist M, Damber JE, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, Wiklund P, Steineck G (2015) Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Journal 68:216–225

Google Scholar 

Ghani KR, Trinh QD, Menon M (2012) Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy-technique in 2012. Journal 26:1558–1565

Google Scholar 

Wagaskar VG, Mittal A, Sobotka S, Ratnani P, Lantz A, Falagario UG, Martini A, Dovey Z, Treacy PJ, Pathak P, Nair S, Roy B, Chakravarty D, Lewis S, Haines K 3rd, Wiklund P, Tewari A (2021) Hood technique for robotic radical prostatectomy-preserving periurethral anatomical structures in the space of Retzius and sparing the pouch of Douglas, enabling early return of continence without compromising surgical margin rates. Journal 80:213–221

Google Scholar 

Ferretti S, Dell’Oglio P, Ciavarella D, Galfano A, Schips L, Marchioni M (2023) Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted prostatectomy: technical challenges for surgeons and key prospective refinements. Journal 15:541–552

Google Scholar 

Beyer B, Schlomm T, Tennstedt P, Boehm K, Adam M, Schiffmann J, Sauter G, Wittmer C, Steuber T, Graefen M, Huland H, Haese A (2014) A feasible and time-efficient adaptation of NeuroSAFE for da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal 66:138–144

Google Scholar 

Nunez Bragayrac LA, Hussein AA, Attwood K, Pop E, James G, Osei J, Murekeysoni C, Kauffman EC (2020) Feasibility and continence outcomes of extended prostatic urethral preservation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal 23:286–294

Google Scholar 

Toth S, Vajda J, Pasztor E, Toth Z (1987) Separation of the tumor and brain surface by “water jet” in cases of meningiomas. Journal 5:117–124

CAS  Google Scholar 

May J, McGovern F (2005) Hemostatic hydrodissection: a new technique to promote nerve-sparing during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Journal 6:1

Google Scholar 

Valencia LC, Pérez GF, Kaplan J, Fernández-Riera R (2019) Buccal fat pad excision: hydrodissection technique. Journal 39:1037–1045

Google Scholar 

Dufour E, Donat N, Jaziri S, Kurdi O, Couturier C, Dreyfus JF, Fischler M (2012) Ultrasound-guided perineural circumferential median nerve block with and without prior dextrose 5% hydrodissection: a prospective randomized double-blinded noninferiority trial. Journal 115:728–733

CAS  Google Scholar 

Masuda Y, Iwaki H, Kato N, Takahashi G, Oki K, Tsuneoka H (2017) Irrigation dynamic pressure-assisted hydrodissection during cataract surgery. Journal 11:323–328

Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal 372:n71

Google Scholar 

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Journal 336:924–926

Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Journal 327:557–560

Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Journal 21:1539–1558

Google Scholar 

Crocerossa F, Carbonara U, Cantiello F, Marchioni M, Ditonno P, Mir MC, Porpiglia F, Derweesh I, Hampton LJ, Damiano R, Autorino R (2021) Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Journal 80:428–439

Google Scholar 

Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I (2006) The case of the misleading funnel plot. Journal 333:597–600

Google Scholar 

Hatiboglu G, Simpfendörfer T, Uhlmann L, Macher-Göppinger S, Nyarangi-Dix J, Pahernik S, Hadaschik B, Hohenfellner M, Teber D (2017) A prospective randomized controlled trial for assessment of perineal hydrodissection technique for nervesparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal 197:e707

Google Scholar 

Wenger H, Razmaria A, Eggener S, Raman JD (2017) Nerve Bundle Hydrodissection and Sexual Function after Robot Prostatectomy. Journal 21:e2017.00068

Google Scholar 

Asimakopoulos AD, Annino F, Pastore AL, Carbone A, Fuschi A (2022) Free-hand, transrectal ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of the retroprostatic space during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact on the learning curve. Journal 40:408.e1-408.e8

Google Scholar 

Elsayed AS, Ely HB, Abdelhakim MA, Saad IR, Jing Z, Iqbal U, Ramahi Y, Joseph J, Houenstein H, James G, Peabody JO, Razzak OA, Hussein AA, Guru KA (2022) Preservation of endopelvic fascia, puboprostatic ligaments, dorsal venous complex and hydrodissection of the neurovascular bundles during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a video demonstration and propensity score matched outcomes. Journal 14:100143

Google Scholar 

Pedraza AM, Gupta R, Joshi H, Parekh S, Schlussel K, Berryhill R, Kaufmann B, Wagaskar V, Gorin MA, Menon M, Tewari AK (2024) Saline-assisted fascial exposure (SAFE) technique to improve nerve-sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Journal 133:451–459

Google Scholar 

von Hippel PT (2015) The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses. Journal 15:35

Google Scholar 

Fang C, Wang C, Liu K, Pang X (2021) Early outcomes of left subclavian artery revascularization using castor single-branched stent-graft in the treatment of type B aortic dissection or intramural hematoma. Journal 27:251–259

Google Scholar 

Fuschi A, Al Salhi Y, Capone L, Martoccia A, Suraci P, Asimakopoulos A, Scalzo S, Valenzi F, Rera O, Antonioni A et al (2022) Transrectal ultrasound guided hydro dissection of the rectum-vesicular layer before robot assisted radical prostatectomy: proposal of a new technique to improve early recovery of continence and erectile function. Journal 81:S1691

Google Scholar 

Tasoulis MK, Agusti A, Karakatsanis A, Montgomery C, Marshall C, Gui G (2019) The use of hydrodissection in nipple- and skin-sparing mastectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Journal 7:e2495

Google Scholar 

Tanaka K, Shigemura K, Muramaki M, Takahashi S, Miyake H, Fujisawa M (2013) Efficacy of using three-tesla magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of capsule invasion for decision-making about neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal 54:437–441

Google Scholar 

Guru KA, Perlmutter AE, Butt ZM, Peabody JO (2008) Hydrodissection for preservation of neurovascular bundle during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal 15:4000–4003

Google Scholar 

Patel SR, Pareek G, Haleblian GE (2009) Hydrodissection of the neurovascular bundles during robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not affect pathologic margin status. Journal 181:433–434

Google Scholar 

Shi T, Zhang X, Ma X, Li H, Wang B, Fan Y, Gao Y (2018) High anterior release of neurovascular bundle by hydrodissection during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and short-term outcomes. Jounal 199:e820–e821

Google Scholar 

Freire MP, Weinberg AC, Lei Y, Soukup JR, Lipsitz SR, Prasad SM, Korkes F, Lin T, Hu JC (2009) Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Jounal 56:972–980

Google Scholar 

Pushkar D, Kolontarev K, Govorov A, Rasner P (2014) Hydrodissection technique of neurovascular bundle preservation during robotic radical prostatectomy. Jounal 13:21–22

Google Scholar