Weber G, Bookstein F. Virtual Anthropology: A new interdisciplinary field of science, in: 2011: pp. 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-49347-2_1.
Winskog C, Persson A, Ljung P, Ynnerman A, Lundström C. Full body virtual autopsies using a state-of-the-art volume rendering Pipeline. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2006;12:869–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.146.
Okuda T, Shiotani S, Sakamoto N, Kobayashi T. Background and current status of postmortem imaging in Japan: short history of autopsy imaging (Ai). Forensic Sci Int. 2013;225:3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.010.
Malfroy Camine L, Varlet V, Campana L, Grabherr S, Moghaddam N. The big puzzle: a critical review of virtual re-association methods for fragmented human remains in a DVI context’. Forensic Sci Int. 2022;330:111033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111033.
Krentz BV, Alamo L, Grimm J, Dédouit F, Bruguier C, Chevallier C, Egger C, Da Silva LFF, Grabherr S. Performance of post-mortem CT compared to autopsy in children. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130:1089–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1370-z.
Jalalzadeh H, Giannakopoulos GF, Berger FH, Fronczek J, van de Goot FRW, Reijnders UJ, Zuidema WP. Post-mortem imaging compared with autopsy in trauma victims - a systematic review. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;257:29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.026.
Thali M, Yen K, Schweitzer W, Vock P, Boesch C, Ozdoba C, Schroth G, Ith M, Sonnenschein M, Doernhoefer T, Scheurer E, Plattner T, Dirnhofer R. Virtopsy, a New Imaging Horizon in Forensic Pathology: virtual autopsy by Postmortem Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—a feasibility study. J Forensic Sci. 2003;48:386–403. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2002166.
Buck U, Naether S, Braun M, Bolliger S, Friederich H, Jackowski C, Aghayev E, Christe A, Vock P, Dirnhofer R, Thali MJ. Application of 3D documentation and geometric reconstruction methods in traffic accident analysis: with high resolution surface scanning, radiological MSCT/MRI scanning and real data based animation. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;170:20–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.08.024.
Ruder TD, Thali MJ, Hatch GM. Essentials of forensic post-mortem MR imaging in adults. Br J Radiol. 2014;87. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130567.
Thali MJ, Braun M, Dirnhofer R. Optical 3D surface digitizing in forensic medicine: 3D documentation of skin and bone injuries. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;137:203–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.07.009.
King C, Birch W. Assessment of Maceration techniques used to remove soft tissue from bone in cut Mark Analysis. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60:124–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12582.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
De Froidmont S, Grabherr S, Vaucher P, De Cesare M, Egger C, Papageorgopoulou C, Roth V, Morand G, Mangin P, Uldin T. Virtual anthropology: a comparison between the performance of conventional X-ray and MDCT in investigating the trabecular structure of long bones. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;225:53–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.029.
Grabherr S, Cooper C, Ulrich-Bochsler S, Uldin T, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Bolliger S, Christe A, Schnyder P, Mangin P, Thali MJ. Estimation of sex and age of virtual skeletons - a feasibility study. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:419–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1155-y.
Steadman DW, DiAntonio LL, Wilson JJ, Sheridan KE, Tammariello SP. The effects of chemical and heat maceration techniques on the recovery of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from bone. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:11–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00001.x.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Couse T, Connor M. A comparison of Maceration techniques for use in forensic skeletal preparations. J Forensic Investig. 2015;3:1–6. https://doi.org/10.13188/2330-0396.1000021.
Husch C, Berner M, Goldammer H, Lichtscheidl-Schultz I. Technical note: a novel method for gentle and non-destructive removal of flesh from bones. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;323:110778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110778.
Triaca A, Mahon T-J, Myburgh J. A comparison of different maceration techniques on burnt remains. J Forensic Sci. 2022;67:676–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14939.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mahon T-J, Maboke N, Myburgh J. The use of different detergents in skeletal preparations. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;327:110967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110967.
Keyes CA, Giltrow KR, Mahon TJ. A comparison of maceration methods for the preparation of infant skeletal remains for forensic anthropological analysis. Int J Legal Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03137-4.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rennick S, Fenton T, Foran D. The effects of skeletal Preparation techniques on DNA from human and non-human bone. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:1016–9. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2004405.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gelaude F, Vander Sloten J, Lauwers B. Accuracy assessment of CT-based outer surface femur meshes. Comput Aided Surg. 2008;13:188–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10929080802195783.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Van den Broeck J, Vereecke E, Wirix-Speetjens R, Vander J, Sloten. Segmentation accuracy of long bones. Med Eng Phys. 2014;36:949–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.03.016.
van Eijnatten M, van Dijk R, Dobbe J, Streekstra G, Koivisto J, Wolff J. CT image segmentation methods for bone used in medical additive manufacturing. Med Eng Phys. 2018;51:6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.10.008.
Pinheiro M, Alves JL. A new level-set-based protocol for accurate bone segmentation from ct imaging. IEEE Access. 2015;3:1894–906. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2484259.
Lalone EA, Willing RT, Shannon HL, King GJW, Johnson JA. Accuracy assessment of 3D bone reconstructions using CT: an intro comparison. Med Eng Phys. 2015;37:729–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.04.010.
Fahrni S, Campana L, Dominguez A, Uldin T, Dedouit F, Delémont O, Grabherr S. CT-scan vs. 3D surface scanning of a skull: first considerations regarding reproducibility issues. Forensic Sci Res. 2017;2:93–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2017.1334353.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hangartner TN. Thresholding technique for accurate analysis of density and geometry in QCT, pQCT and ÌCT images. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2007;7:9–16.
Finlay JB, Hardie WR. Anisotropie Contraction of cortical bone caused by dehydration of samples of the bovine femur in Vitro. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med. 1994;208:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/095441199420800104.
Tersigni MA, Microscopic Investigation. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00325.x.
Lander SL, Brits D, Hosie M. The effects of freezing, boiling and degreasing on the microstructure of bone. HOMO. 2014;65:131–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2013.09.006.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Baumbach SF, Schmidt R, Varga P, Heinz T, Vécsei V, Zysset PK. Where is the distal fracture line location of dorsally displaced distal radius fractures? J Orthop Res. 2011;29:489–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21268.
Wang F, Metzner F, Zheng L, Osterhoff G, Schleifenbaum S. Selected mechanical properties of human cancellous bone subjected to different treatments: short-term immersion in physiological saline and acetone treatment with subsequent immersion in physiological saline. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17:376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03265-4.
留言 (0)