Kasey Ann Irwin Student, Adelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Frank Donnelly Professor, dean of nursing, Adelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Janet Kelly Professor, course coordinator, Adelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Why you should read this article

• To understand that preserving action or process when coding gerunds in constructivist grounded theory research can help discover the participants’ main concerns, which provide context for the substantive theory

• To appreciate that looking for and recognising gerunds in qualitative data can be confusing for novice researchers

• To benefit from an example of coding gerunds to gain deeper insights and depth to qualitative data analysis

Background Coding for gerunds is useful in developing theory in grounded theory. However, it can be confusing for the novice researcher to recognise these words, which consider actions more abstractly.

Aim To explain how to identify, analyse and code gerunds, using the example of a constructivist grounded theory study investigating the design of operating rooms.

Discussion Coding for gerunds helped to illustrate participants’ actions and sequences in the example study and added depth to the researcher’s understanding of certain topics.

Conclusion Coding gerunds can improve the insights obtained in grounded theory studies.

Implications for practice This article may encourage nurse researchers to focus on actions to add depth to their qualitative analyses.

Nurse Researcher. 32, 2, 31-38. doi: 10.7748/nr.2024.e1914

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

Correspondence

kasey.irwin@adelaide.edu.au

Conflict of interest

None declared

Irwin KA, Donnelly F, Kelly J (2024) How to code gerunds in constructivist grounded theory research: an example. Nurse Researcher. doi: 10.7748/nr.2024.e1914

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank all participants who voluntarily took part in this study

Published online: 14 March 2024

Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits: Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more