SART [WWW Document]. https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?reportingYear=2020. 2021. Accessed 13 March 2023.
Harton GL, Munné S, Surrey M, Grifo J, Kaplan B, McCulloh DH, Griffin DK, Wells D. Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1695–703.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sawarkar S, Griffin DK, Ribustello L, Munné S. Large Intra-Age Group Variation in Chromosome Abnormalities in Human Blastocysts. DNA. 2021;1:91–104.
Munné S, Alikani M, Ribustello L, Colls P, Martínez-Ortiz PA, Mcculloh DH. Euploidy rates in donor egg cycles significantly differ between fertility centers. Hum Rep. 2017;32:743–9.
Zheng Z, Chen L, Yang T, Yu H, Wang H, Qin J. Multiple pregnancies achieved with IVF/ICSI and risk of specific congenital malformations: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36:472–82.
Bori L, Paya E, Alegre L, Viloria TA, Remohi JA, Naranjo V, Meseguer M. Novel and conventional embryo parameters as input data for artificial neural networks: an artificial intelligence model applied for prediction of the implantation potential. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:1232–41.
Diakiw SM, Hall JMM, VerMilyea M, Lim AYX, Quangkananurug W, Chanchamroen S, Bankowski B, Stones R, Storr A, Miller A, Adaniya G, van Tol R, Hanson R, Aizpurua J, Giardini L, Johnston A, Van Nguyen T, Dakka MA, Perugini D, Perugini M. An artificial intelligence model correlated with morphological and genetic features of blastocyst quality improves ranking of viable embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45:1105–17.
Fordham DE, Rosentraub D, Polsky AL, Aviram T, Wolf Y, Perl O, Devir A, Rosentraub S, Silver DH, Gold Zamir Y, Bronstein AM, Lara Lara M, Ben Nagi J, Alvarez A, Munné S. Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity? Hum Rep. 2022;37:2275–90.
Munné S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Rep. 1993;8:2185–91.
Scott RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, Tao X, Treff NR. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: A randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:697–703.
Tiegs AW, Tao X, Zhan Y, Whitehead C, Kim J, Hanson B, Osman E, Kim TJ, Patounakis G, Gutmann J, Castelbaum A, Seli E, Jalas C, Scott RT. A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using a targeted next-generation sequencing–based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:627–37.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang S, Luo K, Cheng D, Tan Y, Lu C, He H, Gu Y, Lu G, Gong F, Lin G. Number of biopsied trophectoderm cells is likely to affect the implantation potential of blastocysts with poor trophectoderm quality. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1222-1227.e4.
Munné S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, Child T, Nakhuda G, Shamma FN, Silverberg K, Kalista T, Handyside AH, Katz-Jaffe M, Wells D, Gordon T, Stock-Myer S, Willman S, Acacio B, Lavery S, Carby A, Boostanfar R, Forman R, Sedler M, Jackson A, Jordan K, Schoolcraft W, McReynolds S, Schnell V, Loy R, Chantilis S, Ku L, Frattarelli J, Morales A, Craig HR, Perloe M, Witz C, Wang WH, Wilcox J, Norian J, Thompson SM, Chen S, Garrisi J, Walmsley R, Mendola R, Pang S, Sakkas D, Rooney K, Sneeringer R, Glassner M, Wilton L, Martic M, Coleman P, Shepley S, Mounce G, Griffiths T, Feinberg RF, Blauer K, Reggio B, Rhinehart R, Ziegler W, Ahmed H, Kratka S, Rosenbluth E, Ivani K, Thyer A, Minter T, Miller C, Gysler M, Saunders P, Casper R, Conway D, Hughes M, Large M, Blazek J, Fragouli E, Alfarawati S. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:1071-1079.e7.
Kuznyetsov V, Madjunkova S, Abramov R, Antes R, Ibarrientos Z, Motamedi G, Zaman A, Kuznyetsova I, Librach CL. Minimally invasive cell-free human embryo aneuploidy testing (miPGT-A) utilizing combined spent embryo culture medium and blastocoel fluid–towards development of a clinical assay. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7244.
Rubio C, Rienzi L, Navarro-Sánchez L, Cimadomo D, García-Pascual CM, Albricci L, Soscia D, Valbuena D, Capalbo A, Ubaldi F, Simón C. Embryonic cell-free DNA versus trophectoderm biopsy for aneuploidy testing: concordance rate and clinical implications. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:510–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen L, Li W, Liu Y, Peng Z, Cai L, Zhang N, Xu J, Wang L, Teng X, Yao Y, Zou Y, Ma M, Liu J, Lu S, Sun H, Yao B. Non-invasive embryo selection strategy for clinical IVF to avoid wastage of potentially competent embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45:26–34.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ahlström A, Wikland M, Rogberg L, Barnett JS, Tucker M, Hardarson T. Cross-validation and predictive value of near-infrared spectroscopy algorithms for day-5 blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22:477–84.
Nicholson JK, Lindon JC, Holmes E. ‘Metabonomics’: understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica. 29:1181–9.
Seli E, Sakkas D, Scott R, Kwok SC, Rosendahl SM, Burns DH. Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using Raman and near-infrared spectroscopy correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1350–7.
Hardarson T, Ahlstrm A, Rogberg L, Botros L, Hillensj T, Westlander G, Sakkas D, Wikland M. Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of Day 2 and 5 embryo culture medium: A prospective randomized trial. Human Reproduction. 2012;27:89–96.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rødgaard T, Heegaard PMH, Callesen H. Non-invasive assessment of in-vitro embryo quality to improve transfer success. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:585–92.
Pudakalakatti SM, Uppangala S, D’Souza F, Kalthur G, Kumar P, Adiga SK, Atreya HS. NMR studies of preimplantation embryo metabolism in human assisted reproductive techniques: A new biomarker for assessment of embryo implantation potential. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:20–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Seli E, Bruce C, Botros L, Henson M, Roos P, Judge K, Hardarson T, Ahlström A, Harrison P, Henman M, Go K, Acevedo N, Siques J, Tucker M, Sakkas D. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of day 5 morphology grading and metabolomic Viability Score on predicting implantation outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:137–44.
Olcay IO, Akcay B, Bahceci M, Arici A, Boynukalin K, Yakicier C, Ozpinar A, Basar M. Noninvasive amino acid turnover predicts human embryo aneuploidy. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2022;38:461–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Berlanga O, Bradshaw HB, Vilella-Mitjana F, Garrido-Gómez T, Simón C. How endometrial secretomics can help in predicting implantation. Placenta. 2011;32(Suppl 3):S271-5.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
D’Alessandro A, Federica G, Palini S, Bulletti C, Zolla L. A mass spectrometry-based targeted metabolomics strategy of human blastocoele fluid: A promising tool in fertility research. Mol Biosyst. 2012;8:953–8.
Ferrick L, Lee YSL, Gardner DK. Metabolic activity of human blastocysts correlates with their morphokinetics, morphological grade, KIDScore and artificial intelligence ranking. Hum Rep. 2020;35:2004–16.
Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Abdalla H, Nikolau D, Norman-Taylor J, Johnson M, Holmes E, Thum MY. Metabolomics as a tool to identify biomarkers to predict and improve outcomes in reproductive medicine: A systematic review. Hum Rep. 2017;23:723–36.
Seli E, Botros L, Sakkas D, Burns DH. Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using proton nuclear magnetic resonance correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2183–9.
Li S, Park Y, Duraisingham S, Strobel FH, Khan N, Soltow QA, Jones DP, Pulendran B. Predicting network activity from high throughput metabolomics. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9:e1003123.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–15550.
Xia J, Wishart DS. MSEA: A web-based tool to identify biologically meaningful patterns in quantitative metabolomic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W71–7.
Pang Z, Chong J, Zhou G, de Lima Morais DA, Chang L, Barrette M, Gauthier C, Jacques PÉ, Li S, Xia J. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: Narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W388–W396.
Gardner DK, Balaban B. Assessment of human embryo development using morphological criteria in an era of time-lapse, algorithms and ‘OMICS’: is looking good still important? Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22:704–18.
Rubio C, Navarro-Sánchez L, García-Pascual CM, Ocali O, Cimadomo D, Venier W, Barroso G, Kopcow L, Bahçeci M, Kulmann MIR, López L, De la Fuente E, Navarro R, Valbuena D, Sakkas D, Rienzi L, Simón C. Multicenter prospective study of concordance between embryo cell-free DNA and trophectoderm biopsies from 1,301 human blastocysts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:751.e1–751.e13.
Cabello-Pinedo S, Abdulla HAN, Seth-Smith ML, Escriba M, Crespo J, Munné S, Horcajadas JA. A novel non-invasive metabolomics approach to screen embryos for aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:e5–6.
Brison DR, Houghton FD, Falconer D, Roberts SA, Hawkhead J, Humpherson PG, Lieberman BA, Leese HJ. Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover. Hum Rep. 2004;19:2319–24.
Houghton FD, Hawkhead JA, Humpherson PG, Hogg JE, Balen AH, Rutherford AJ, Leese HJ. Non-invasive amino acid turnover predicts human embryo developmental capacity. Human Reproduction. 2002;17:999–1005.
Picton HM, Elder K, Houghton FD, Hawkhead JA, Rutherford AJ, Hogg JE, Leese HJ, Harris SE. Association between amino acid turnover and chromosome aneuploidy during human preimplantation embryo development in vitro. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:557–569.
Salmerón AM, Abreu AC, Vilches-Ferrón M, Fernández I. Solution NMR in human embryo culture media as an option for assessment of embryo implantation potential. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4536.
Wallace M, Cottell E, Cullinane J, McAuliffe FM, Wingfield M, Brennan L. 1H NMR based metabolic profiling of day 2 spent embryo media correlates with implantation potential. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2014;60:58–63.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nadal-Desbarats L, Veau S, Blasco H, Emond P, Royere D, Andres CR, Guérif F. Is NMR metabolic profiling of spent embryo culture media useful to assist in vitro human embryo selection? Magn Reson Mater Phy Biol Med. 2013;26:193–202.
留言 (0)