Development of an artificial intelligence-based multimodal model for assisting in the diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis in newborns: a retrospective study

Introduction

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the leading cause of neonatal death (13). The incidence of NEC is approximately 1%–3%, with a mortality rate of 15%–30% (4). In extremely low birth weight infants, the incidence of NEC can reach 5%–16%, with a mortality rate as high as 20%–50% (5). Surviving NEC infants often suffer from severe complications such as intestinal failure, short bowel syndrome, growth retardation, and neurological developmental disorders, which greatly affect their quality of life (69). Early diagnosis of NEC is crucial for improving the prognosis of affected infants. Currently, the diagnosis of NEC mainly relies on a comprehensive evaluation of clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, and imaging studies (10). However, clinical manifestations and laboratory tests lack specificity, making the integration of imaging studies particularly important. However, most clinical doctors lack systematic training in imaging, therefore heavily relying on imaging reports prepared by radiologists. In actual practice, due to various factors such as professional expertise and experience, different radiologists may provide different reports for the same patient's chest and abdomen films, which can affect the treatment decisions of clinical doctors and ultimately the health and development of the infants. Early and rapid diagnosis of NEC has always been a major challenge in intensive care clinical practice.

Multimodal deep learning models have attracted increasing attention in the field of artificial intelligence in recent years (1114). Different forms or sources of information can all be referred to as modalities, and data composed of two or more modalities are called multimodal data. As a large amount of data of various types is generated in clinical practice, multimodal deep learning models have been widely applied and developed in the medical field. In the field of NEC-assisted diagnosis, the published studies mainly focus on the use of single-modal data such as laboratory test indicators or abdominal x-rays and ultrasound for NEC recognition and assisted diagnosis (1518). However, these models have poor generalization, and the changes in NEC patients' blood parameters and imaging data have not been fully explored.

In order to achieve early, rapid, economical, and standardized diagnosis of NEC in clinical scenarios with imbalanced medical resources, in this study, we constructed an AI-based multimodal model and used admission laboratory test data and abdominal x-ray image data to build, train, and evaluate the model. Then, we conducted interpretability analysis and external validation with clinical doctor data, achieving the best-known performance in assisted diagnosis. This effectively assists clinical doctors in diagnosing and treating NEC in underdeveloped areas, increasing the early diagnosis rate of NEC, reducing misdiagnosis, missed diagnosis, and the occurrence of complications, and protecting the health of children.

Method Dataset establishment

This study is a cohort study. A total of 408 newborns who were admitted to our NICU from January 2022 to January 2024 were selected as the research subjects, including 204 cases of NEC patients and 204 cases of healthy infants. All NEC patients met the diagnostic criteria for NEC. The diagnostic criteria are based on the 2020 NEC diagnostic guidelines. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of this study.

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Study design flowchart.

The initial blood laboratory examination indicators (12 laboratory indicators determined according to the NEC diagnosis and treatment guidelines and clinical experience of doctors) and abdominal x-ray images of the research subjects were collected as research data. Inclusion criteria for image collection: (1) The patient is diagnosed with NEC for the first time. (2) Complete laboratory examination and abdominal x-ray examination are performed before treatment. Exclusion criteria: (1) Conditions such as pneumonia, congenital heart disease, sedative use, etc., may affect the quality of abdominal x-ray image diagnosis. (2) Non-first admission children. (3) Missing laboratory test indicators exceeding 30%. (4) The presence of conditions such as pneumonia, septicemia, etc., which may affect the diagnosis of laboratory test results.

All participants signed informed consent forms. This study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Review Committee. All data were strictly protected. All methods comply with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Data processing

A total of 408 newborns were included in this study, including 204 non-NEC newborns and 204 newborns diagnosed with NEC, gestational age ranging from 26 to 40 weeks, and an average gestational age of 33 weeks. A total of 11,016 laboratory test data of the 408 children and 408 abdominal x-ray images were analyzed. The dataset was partitioned into training and validation sets in an 8:2 ratio, comprising laboratory assay results and abdominal x-ray images from 326 to 82 children, respectively. The distribution of demographic data is shown in Table 1.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of clinical characteristics between the normal group and the NEC group in the cohort.

According to the NEC diagnosis and treatment guidelines, 27 laboratory examination data were included. These parameters include hematology analysis: neutrophil count, platelet count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil percentage, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, white blood cell count, and hemoglobin. In addition, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and blood gas analysis, etc., were included.

Abdominal x-ray image data were collected from newborns who met the inclusion criteria, and x-ray examinations were performed using the Carestream DRX Revolution machine. The reason for using abdominal x-ray examination in this study is that abdominal ultrasound requires a professional ultrasonographer to achieve good results, and it is highly subjective. Abdominal x-ray examination has higher stability, can reflect the progression of NEC, and can be performed in hospitals at all levels. It has good generalizability and is also a reliable evidence recommended in clinical guidelines. In order to reduce the overfitting phenomenon during model training, image enhancement techniques such as horizontal flipping, rotation, and stretching were used to enhance the x-ray images in the dataset. All images were downsampled and converted into JPG images with a resolution of 256 × 256.

Model design

This paper proposes a multimodal classification method based on Residual Neural Network (ResNet) (19) for processing images and one-dimensional CNN for processing data. By fusing the features of images and one-dimensional data in the fully connected layer, the joint classification of multimodal data is achieved. The residual network addresses the optimization training difficulties of neural networks when the depth increases by introducing residual blocks. The laboratory test results are processed by one-dimensional CNN to construct a multimodal network that simultaneously processes laboratory and symptom images.

To evaluate the performance of the multimodal model, five single-modal residual convolutional networks (ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet101, ResNet152) and separate traditional machine learning models [Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest, Decision Tree, XGBoost, and LightGBM] were also designed for model training and evaluation.ResNet (Residual Network) is a type of deep neural network architecture characterized by the introduction of residual connections, allowing the network to more easily learn identity mappings during training and alleviating the problem of vanishing or exploding gradients. Traditional machine learning models typically refer to models based on statistical learning theory, which are often composed of predefined mathematical functions. The parameters of these models are adjusted through training data to minimize predefined loss functions. Deep neural networks like ResNet often have deeper hierarchical structures and are capable of solving complex tasks by learning richer feature representations, whereas traditional machine learning models tend to rely more on handcrafted features or shallow feature extractors to address relatively simple tasks. In order to reduce the training time cost of the model, we introduce the idea of transfer learning and select the ResNet34 model pre-trained on the ImageNet dataset as the benchmark model for preliminary training, and perform multi-modal model training through local unfreezing. Ten-fold cross-validation was used for validation. Adam optimizer and grid parameters were used for training. The parameters that generated the minimum loss function value in the validation dataset within 100 epochs were selected as the best-performing model.

The hyperparameters were set as Batch size 32 and learning rate 0.000001. The random seed was set as 1024. The model training, construction, and validation were performed using Pytorch (2.2.0) (20) on a computer with an AMD EPYC 7532 processor (32 cores, 64 threads, 2.4–3.3 GHz) and 4×RTX 4090 cards (24GB GDDR6X VRAM, 16,384 CUDA cores).

Model validation

In this study, the multimodal model was combined with gradient-weighted class activation mapping (GradCAM) (21, 22) for attention analysis, enhancing the interpretability of the model and the confidence of doctors. Global average pooling was applied to the last convolutional layer of the trained AI model using a classification activation map. The training weights of each output of the global average pooling layer indicate the importance of each feature map from the last convolutional layer. Then, weights were applied to the corresponding feature maps to generate significance maps. These significance maps were overlaid on the original abdominal x-ray images to visually differentiate the regions of interest prioritized by the multimodal model. To assess the model's performance, we additionally collected an external validation cohort consisting of 50 pediatric cases for prospective validation. After the diagnosis team made a definitive diagnosis, a human-machine comparison test was conducted: three doctors with advanced professional titles in neonatal ICU (unaware of the diagnosis results) and the model were asked to assess the cases based solely on laboratory tests and abdominal x-ray images.

Statistical analysis

Performance indicators, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and F1 score, were compared between the proposed model and existing methods. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.0.0.

Results Demographic data

A total of 408 newborns were included in this study, including 204 non-NEC newborns and 204 newborns diagnosed with NEC, gestational age ranging from 26 to 40 weeks, and an average gestational age of 33 weeks. A total of 11,016 laboratory test data of the 408 children and 408 abdominal x-ray images were analyzed. The distribution of demographic data is shown in Table 1.

In order to improve the efficiency of model training and reduce the interference of irrelevant laboratory test results on model training, we conducted significance analysis on all laboratory test results (blood routine, biochemistry, immunity, etc.). The results after screening are shown in Table 2.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Laboratory test items included in the normal group and NEC group in the dataset.

Model evaluation

In this study, ten-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the performance of each model, with the validation dataset being used for this purpose. Each data point included laboratory test results and abdominal x-ray image data of a newborn. Different types of data were used based on the structure of different models. Table 3 displays the diagnostic performance of each model using the validation dataset. Traditional machine learning models (SVM, RF, XGboost, Decisiontree, LightGBM) had diagnostic accuracies of 79.78%, 80.32%, 77.41%, 81.94%, and 80.51% respectively, significantly lower than the computer vision model (ResNet). The trained multimodal deep learning model (ResNet34-Clinical) exhibited the best performance in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score, significantly outperforming both traditional machine learning models and single computer vision models. The confusion matrix of the ResNet34-Clinical model can be seen in Figure 2A.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Diagnostic performance of deep learning algorithms. The best performance is highlighted in bold, while the second best performance is underlined.

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Performance evaluation of ResNet34-clinical model. (A) Confusion matrix of ResNet34-Clinical on the validation dataset. (B) Receiver operating characteristic curves of the ResNet34-Clinical model on the validation dataset. (C) Receiver operating characteristic curves of the ResNet34-Clinical model on the external independent dataset. (D) Receiver operating characteristic curves of clinical doctors on the external independent dataset.

A recall curve was plotted for the ResNet34-Clinical model, which achieved an AUC of 0.92 (Figure 2B). To assess the stability and generalizability of the model, we designed an additional external validation group of 50 cases for evaluation, comparing the model's ROC curve with the ROC curve of human clinicians. The diagnostic performance of the multimodal deep learning model (AUC = 0.83) was comparable to that of human clinicians (AUC = 0.82) (Figures 2C,D).

In order to enhance confidence and interpretability of the model in clinical scenarios, we applied the GradCAM technique to the model. After validating the abdominal x-ray images in the validation dataset, we found that the model's attention was mainly focused on fixed dilation of intestinal loops, intestinal wall edema, intussusception, and portal venous gas, which aligns with clinical experience and demonstrates the feasibility of our model. The evaluation of model attention can be seen in Figure 3.

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. ResNet34-Clinical grad-CAM images (A) Overlaid images of abdominal x-rays and GradCAM for NEC patients. (B) Display of overlaid images of abdominal x-rays and GradCAM for non-NEC newborns. The thicker red area indicates the image portions that ResNet34-Clinical focuses on during the classification of NEC patients and healthy non-NEC newborns.

Discussion

This study developed an artificial intelligence-based multimodal model to assist clinical doctors in early diagnosis of NEC. Among the published multimodal studies, the best performance was achieved by WENJING GAO's ResNet50 model (17), a deeper neural network, trained on a large-scale dataset (n 3= 4,535), yielding more accurate results (ROC = 0.93). In contrast, our study utilized a faster training speed, shallower neural network, ResNet34 model, achieving comparable results (ROC = 0.91) on a smaller dataset (n = 408), suggesting that lightweight models may have better applicability in medical image analysis due to limitations in data scale. To enhance clinical confidence in our model, we not only integrated the approach proposed by GAO, employing gradient-weighted class activation mapping to explain the model's decision process, but also conducted an additional human-machine comparative experiment with an external validation cohort, achieving promising results (ROC = 0.83). The visually significant regions identified by GradCAM are consistent with clinical experiences, including fixed dilation of intestinal loops, intestinal wall edema, intramural gas, and portal vein gas. Our multimodal model can aid clinical doctors in early and accurate diagnosis of NEC in medically underserved areas, reducing complications and even fatalities resulting from misdiagnosis.

Our multimodal model does not require special laboratory tests and can be routinely implemented for NEC diagnosis by integrating routine laboratory tests available in every hospital with standardized abdominal x-ray images. The performance of the multimodal model is significantly superior to that of other single-modal models and traditional machine learning models.

Limitations: Firstly, since this study is a single-center study, in order to ensure the generalizability of the model, we plan to validate and test the model with a larger dataset from multiple centers. Secondly, the performance of the model in this study is similar to the diagnosis accuracy of pediatric doctors with ten years of clinical experience. We plan to establish a larger-scale dataset in the next step to improve the accuracy of the multimodal model. Thirdly, for the diagnosis of NEC, abdominal ultrasound images are also crucial. Our multimodal model currently only processes laboratory results and abdominal x-ray image information. We plan to incorporate an abdominal ultrasound data processing module in the next step to fully exploit clinical data and further improve the model's performance.

In this study, we developed a multimodal model using deep learning that can assist clinical doctors in early and rapid diagnosis of NEC. This model has broad prospects for assisting in the diagnosis of NEC in medically underdeveloped areas, enabling doctors to achieve early, convenient, economical, and accurate diagnosis and treatment of NEC, better safeguarding the health of newborns.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)’ legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

KC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SC: Formal Analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft. YM: Methodology, Writing – original draft. ZH: Writing – original draft. LX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This study was supported by a grant from the Youth Project of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [No: ZR2020QH054].

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Sodhi CP, Shi X, Richardson WM, Grant ZS, Shapiro RA, Prindle T, et al. Toll-like-receptor-4 inhibits enterocyte proliferation via impaired β-catenin signaling in necrotizing enterocolitis. Gastroenterology. (2010) 138:185. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.045

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Ma F, Li S, Gao X, Zhou J, Zhu X, Wang D, et al. Interleukin-6-mediated CCR9+interleukin-17-producing regulatory T cells polarization increases the severity of necrotizing enterocolitis. EBioMedicine. (2019) 44:71–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.05.042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Battersby C, Longford N, Costeloe K, Modi N. UK neonatal collaborative necrotising enterocolitis study group. Development of a gestational age-specific case definition for neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. JAMA Pediatr. (2017) 171:256–63. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3633

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Koike Y, Li B, Ganji N, Zhu H, Miyake H, Chen Y, et al. Remote ischemic conditioning counteracts the intestinal damage of necrotizing enterocolitis by improving intestinal microcirculation. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:4950. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18750-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bury RG, Tudehope D. Enteral antibiotics for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in low birthweight or preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2001) 2001:CD000405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000405

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Dreschers S, Platen C, Ludwig A, Gille C, Köstlin N, Orlikowsky TW. Metalloproteinases TACE and MMP-9 differentially regulate death factors on adult and neonatal monocytes after infection with Escherichia coli. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:1399. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061399

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. hou Q, Niño DF, Yamaguchi Y, Wang S, Fulton WB, Jia H, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis induces T lymphocyte–mediated injury in the developing mammalian brain. Sci Transl Med. (2021) 13:eaay6621. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay6621

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Janevic T, Zeitlin J, Auger N, Egorova NN, Hebert P, Balbierz A, et al. Association of race/ethnicity with very preterm neonatal morbidities. JAMA Pediatr. (2018) 172:1061–9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Niño DF, Zhou Q, Yamaguchi Y, Martin LY, Wang S, Fulton WB, et al. Cognitive impairments induced by necrotizing enterocolitis can be prevented by inhibiting microglial activation in mouse brain. Sci Transl Med. (2018) 10:eaan0237. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan0237

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Huang Y, Shao L, Frangi AF. Cross-modality image synthesis via weakly coupled and geometry co-regularized joint dictionary learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2018) 37:815–27. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2781192

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Cordier N, Delingette H, Le M, Ayache N. Extended modality propagation: image synthesis of pathological cases. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2016) 35:2598–608. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2589760

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Wang K, He R, Wang L, Wang W, Tan T. Joint feature selection and subspace learning for cross-modal retrieval. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. (2016) 38:2010–23. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2505311

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Chen M, Carass A, Jog A, Lee J, Roy S, Prince JL. Cross contrast multi-channel image registration using image synthesis for MR brain images. Med Image Anal. (2017) 36:2. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.10.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. van Druten J, Khashu M, Chan SS, Sharif S, Abdalla H. Abdominal ultrasound should become part of standard care for early diagnosis and management of necrotising enterocolitis: a narrative review. Arch Dis Child-Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2019) 104:F551–9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316263

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Sitek A, Seliga-Siwecka J, Płotka S, Grzeszczyk MK, Seliga S, Włodarczyk K, et al. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis in newborns. Pediatr Res. (2023) 93:376–81. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02322-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Gao W, Pei Y, Liang H, Lv J, Chen J, Zhong W. Multimodal AI system for the rapid diagnosis and surgical prediction of necrotizing enterocolitis. IEEE Access. (2021) 9:51050–64. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069191

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Fu C-Y, Li L-Q, Yang T, She X, Ai Q, Wang Z-L. Autoinducer-2 may be a new biomarker for monitoring neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2020) 10:140. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00140

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas, NV, USA: IEEE (2016). p. 770–8. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90

20. Imambi S, Prakash KB, Kanagachidambaresan GR. “Pytorch,” In: Prakash KB, Kanagachidambaresan GR, editors. Programming with TensorFlow: Solution for Edge Computing Applications. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2021). p. 87–104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57077-4_10

Google Scholar

21. Selvaraju RR, Das A, Vedantam R, Cogswell M, Parikh D, Batra D. Grad-CAM: Why did you say that? (2017). doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1611.07450

Google Scholar

22. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D. Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); 2017 Oct 22–29; Venice, Italy. IEEE (2017). p. 618–26. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.74

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif