Ali, S., Crişan, I., Abeare, C. A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). Cross-cultural performance validity testing: Managing false positives in examinees with limited English proficiency. Developmental Neuropsychology, 47(6), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2022.2105847

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baak, M., Koopman, R., Snoek, H., & Klous, S. (2020). A new correlation coefficient between categorical, ordinal and interval variables with Pearson characteristics. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 152, 107043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2020.107043

Article  Google Scholar 

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020a). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.

Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020b). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Technical manual. University of Minnesota Press.

Berthelson, L., Mulchan, S. S., Odland, A. P., Miller, L. J., & Mittenberg, W. (2013). False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests. Brain Injury, 27(7–8), 909–916. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.793400

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boone, K. B. (2009). The need for continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort/ response bias during neuropsychological examinations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(4), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802427803

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boone, K. B. (2013). Clinical Practice of Forensic Neuropsychology. Guilford Press.

Google Scholar 

Bossuyt, P. M. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., Altman, D. G., Hooft, L., Korevaar, D. A., & Cohen, J. F. (2015). STARD 2015 – An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ - Clinical Research, 351, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527

Article  Google Scholar 

Bush, S. S. (2023). Questioning what we thought we knew: Commentary on Leonhard’s performance validity assessment articles. Neuropsychology Review, 33(3), 624–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09603-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crişan, I., May, N., Giromini, L., Roth, R. M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023). Replicating the classification accuracy of the Verbal Paired Associates and Visual Reproduction recognition trials as embedded performance validity tests. Neuropsychology. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/neu0000934

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). 509 U.S. 579.

Denning, J. (2021). When 10 is enough: Errors on the first 10 items of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMMe10) and administration time predict freestanding performance validity tests (PVTs) and underperformance on memory measures. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 28(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1588122

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Denning, J. H. (2012). The efficiency and accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, errors on the first 10 items of the Test of Memory Malingering, and five embedded measures in predicting invalid test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs044

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dorociak, K. E., Schulze, E. T., Piper, L. E., Molokie, R. E., & Janecek, J. K. (2018). Performance validity testing in a clinical sample of adults with sickle cell disease. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1339830

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Erdodi, L. A. (2023a). From “below chance” to “a single error is one too many”: Evaluating various thresholds for invalid performance on two forced choice recognition tests. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 41, 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2609

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Erdodi, L. A. (2023b). Multivariate models of performance validity: The Erdodi Index captures the dual nature of non-credible responding (continuous and categorical). Assessment, 30(5), 1467–1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221101910

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Erdodi, L. A. (2023c). Cutoff elasticity in multivariate models of performance validity assessment as a function of the number of components and aggregation method. Psychological Injury and Law, 16(4), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-023-09490-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Erdodi, L. A. (2024). Seeing clearly in the twilight: The clinical and forensic relevance of the indeterminate/ borderline range in multivariate models of performance validity assessment. Accepted for publication.

Google Scholar 

Faust, D. (2023). Invited Commentary: Advancing but not yet advanced: Assessment of effort/malingering in forensic and clinical settings. Neuropsychology Review, 33(3), 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09605-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fischer, J. E., Bachmann, L. M., & Jaeschke, R. (2003). A readers’ guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: Clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine, 29(7), 1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1761-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023). Assessing the credibility of clinical presentations using performance and symptom validity tests: Current trends and future directions—Part 2. Psychology & Neuroscience, 16(3), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000325

Article  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Young, G., & Sellbom, M. (2022). Assessing negative response bias using self-report measures: New articles, new issues. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09444-2

Green, P. (2003). Word Memory Test for Windows: User’s manual and program. Green’s Publishing.

Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6(3), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.3.218

Article  Google Scholar 

Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & Doane, B. M. (2006). Classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering in traumatic brain injury: Results of a known-group analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(7), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390500263550

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Greve, K. W., Binder, L. M., & Bianchini, K. J. (2009). Rates of below-chance performance in forced choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802232690

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holcomb, M. J., Roth, R. M., Tyson, B. T., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). Critical item (CR) analysis expands the classification accuracy of performance validity tests based on the forced choice paradigm – Replicating previously introduced CR cutoffs within the Word Choice Test. Neuropsychology, 36(7), 683–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000834

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hood, E. D., Boone, K. B., Miora, D. S., Cottingham, M. E., Victor, T. L., Zeigler, E. A., Zeller, M. A., & Wright, M. J. (2022). Are there differences in performance validity test scores between African American and white American neuropsychology clinic patients? Journal of Experimental Neuropsychology, 44(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2022.2069230

Article  Google Scholar 

Hromas, G., Rolin, S., & Davis, J. J. (2022). Racial differences in positive findings on embedded performance validity tests. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2146504

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jewsbury, P. (2023). Inference with multiple tests: Commentary to Leonhard. Neuropsychology Review, 33(3), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09604-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(3), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.17.3.410.18089

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Larrabee, G. J. (2008). Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: Relationship to likelihood ratios. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(4), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040701494987

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Larrabee, G. J. (2014). False-positive rates associated with the use of multiple performance and symptom validity tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29, 364–373.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Meyers, J. E. (2009). 40 plus or minus 10, a new magical number: Reply to Russell. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(5), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040902796735

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., & Meyers, J. E. (2019). Use of multiple performance and symptom validity measures: Determining the optimal per test cutoff for determination of invalidity, analysis of skew, and inter-test correlations in valid and invalid performance groups. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(8), 1354–1372.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lawson, A. K., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Collinsworth, L. L. (2023). Computerized test interpretation of the MMPI-2 in the forensic context: A time to use your head and not the formula? Psychological Injury and Law, 16(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09465-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Leonhard, C. (2023a). Review of statistical and methodological issues in the forensic prediction of malingering from validity tests: Part I: Statistical issues. Neuropsychology Review, 33(3), 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09601-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leonhard, C. (2023b). Review of statistical and methodological issues in the forensic prediction of malingering from validity tests: Part II – Methodological issues. Neuropsychological Review, 33(3), 604–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09602-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Leonhard, C. (2023c). Quo Vadis forensic neuropsychological malingering determinations Reply to Drs. Bush, Faust, and Jewsbury. Neuropsychological Review, 33(3), 653–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09606-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Leonhard, C., & Leonhard, C. (2024). Neuropsychological malingering determinations: Science or fiction of lie detection? Georgia Law Review, 58(2), 483.

Google Scholar 

Lippa, S. M. (2018). Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: A clinical guide, critical review, and update on a rapidly evolving literature. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(3), 391–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1406146

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marshall, P. S., & Schroeder, R. W. (2022). Validity assessment in patients with psychiatric disorders. In R. W. Schroeder & P. K. Martin (Eds.), Validity assessment in clinical neuropsychological practice: Evaluating and managing noncredible performance (pp. 319–337). Guilford Press.

Google Scholar 

Martin, P. K., & Schroeder, R. W. (2020). Base rates of invalid test performance across clinical non-forensic contexts and settings. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa017

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597

Article  PubMed