Background: Prior studies have established the impact of sex differences on pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, it remains unclear whether these sex differences extend to other hemodynamic subtypes of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Methods: We examined sex differences in PH and hemodynamic PH subtypes in a hospital-based cohort of individuals who underwent right heart catheterization between 2005-2016. We utilized multivariable linear regression to assess the association of sex with hemodynamic indices of RV function [PA pulsatility index (PAPi), RV stroke work index (RVSWI), and right atrial: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (RA:PCWP)]. We then used Cox regression models to examine the association between sex and clinical outcomes among those with PH. Results: Among 5208 individuals with PH (mean age 64 years, 39% women), there was no significant sex difference in prevalence of PH overall. However, when stratified by PH subtype, 31% of women vs 22% of men had pre-capillary (P<0.001), 39% vs 51% had post-capillary (P=0.03), and 30% vs 27% had mixed PH (P=0.08). Female sex was associated with better RV function by hemodynamic indices, including higher PAPi and RVSWI, and lower RA:PCWP ratio (P<0.001 for all). Over 7.3 years of follow-up, female sex was associated with a lower risk of heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.83, CI 95% CI 0.74? 0.91, p value <0.001). Conclusions: Across a broad hospital-based sample, more women had pre-capillary and more men had post-capillary PH. Compared with men, women with PH had better hemodynamic indices of RV function and a lower risk of HF hospitalization.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

N/A

JEH is supported by NIH grants R01 HL134893, R01 HL140224, R01 HL160003, and K24 HL153669. ESL is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health K23-HL159243 and the American Heart Association (853922).

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Mass General Brigham and Beth Israel IRB committees

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

The data and study materials will not be made available to other researchers for purposes of reproducing the results or replicating the procedure. Statistical code and analytic methods will be made available upon request.