Income inequality and access to advanced immunotherapy for lung cancer: the case of Durvalumab in the Netherlands

Abstract

With the introduction of immunotherapy with non-small lung cancer, prognosis of these patients has improved. However, socio-economic differences in access to various immunotherapy treatments have been reported. In the Netherlands, such differences are not expected due to universal insurance coverage. We investigated the existence of differential susceptibility by socioeconomic status (SES) of the effect of distance to treatment hospital on access to Durvalumab in patients with stage III non-small lung cancer who received chemoradiation, and the influence of differential mortality. We used data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 3774) from the period 2017-2021. First, we fitted Bayesian discrete failure time models and compared SES-by-distance-to-hospital interaction to a baseline model including age, distance, SES and performance score. We then fitted a time to mortality model and used both models in a g-formula to simulate a scenario where mortality levels were equalized. Our results showed that the high SES group received Durvalumab more often than the low SES group (HR = 1.23, CI95% = [1.07, 1.53]), and showed a strong negative effect of distance (OR = 0.63, CI95% = [0.54, 0.72]). Bayes factor < 3 indicated inconclusive evidence for a SES by distance interaction effect, while g-formula results showed virtually no influence from differential mortality on SES differences. Secondary analyses showed strong evidence that SES differences in using Durvalumab were constant over the years (Bayes factor > 17). Overall, these results are significant for understanding how socio-economic inequality affects proper care and can be vital for public policy.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Scientific committee of Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland (IKNL) gave approval of the study.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are not directly available, but need to be requested from Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland (IKNL) through a formal application procedure (www.iknl.nl)

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif