Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to propose a model for examining the impact of inward internationalization on outward internationalization in Iranian pharmaceutical companies by focusing on organizational capabilities.
Methods: Qualitative research was employed, and the grounded theory approach was utilized for data analysis. The study involved conducting interviews with 16 individuals who possessed experience in international activities within the pharmaceutical sector and expertise, using the snowball sampling method. The data gathered from the interviews underwent open, axial, and selective coding analyses, resulting in the development of a paradigm model of internationalization within the pharmaceutical industry. The paradigm model is composed of causal conditions, background conditions, intervening conditions, central phenomena, strategies, and consequences.
Results: The research findings indicated that causal factors of internationalization encompass learning from other countries, updating medical and technical knowledge, expanding activities beyond domestic markets, facilitating production quality improvement, and promoting growth within the pharmaceutical industry. Strategies for internationalization include adopting an international perspective, implementing effective macro-level policies, utilizing long-term strategies, enhancing workforce professional capabilities through training, improving standards and documentation, devising strategies for rational budget utilization, planning for optimal capacity utilization, and strengthening international communication and political relationships.
Conclusion: Ultimately, the consequences of inward internationalization and the enhancement of organizational capabilities lead to outward internationalization and a favorable position within the global pharmaceutical industry, improvements in organizational capabilities and international relations, development of cross-border business, economic prosperity within the pharmaceutical industry, and heightened commitment to foreign markets.

Keywords: Inward internationalization Outward internationalization Grounded theory Organizational capabilities How to Cite

Afzal, F., Faraji Dana, H., Shadnia, S., & Mohammadzadeh, M. (2024). Impact of Inward Internationalization on Outward Internationalization in Enhancing Organizational Capabilities in Iranian Pharmaceutical Companies. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, 14(02). https://doi.org/10.32598/ijmtfm.v14i02.40488

References

1. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. International Business Strategy: Routledge; 2015. p. 33-59.
2. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E. Business relationship learning and commitment in the internationalization process. Journal of international entrepreneurship. 2003;1(1):83-101.
3. Andersen O. Internationalization and market entry mode: A review of theories and conceptual frameworks. MIR: Management International Review. 1997:27-42.
4. Berger AN, Udell GF. A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2006;30(11):2945-66.
5. Welch LS, Luostarinen RK. Inward-outward connections in internationalization. Journal of international Marketing. 1993;1(1):44-56.
6. Dodgson M. Technological collaboration in industry: strategy, policy and internationalization in innovation: Routledge; 2018.
7. Teramae F, Makino T, Lim Y, Sengoku S, Kodama K. International strategy for sustainable growth in multinational pharmaceutical companies. Sustainability. 2020;12(3):867.
8. Karlsson M. The Internationalization of Corporate R & D: Leveraging the Changing Geography of Innovation: Institutet för tillväxtpolitiska studier (ITPS); 2006.
9. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E. Management of foreign market entry. Scandinavian International Business Review. 1992;1(3):9-27.
10. ROCHA A, Blundi MDS, DIAS V. Inward-outward internationalization patterns in two Brazilian industries. XXVI Enanpad. 2002.
11. Bryant A. The grounded theory method. Reviewing qualitative research in the social sciences: Routledge; 2013. p. 120-36.
12. Stough LM, Lee S. Grounded theory approaches used in educational research journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2021;20:16094069211052203.
13. Leighton K, Kardong-Edgren S, Schneidereith T, Foisy-Doll C. Using social media and snowball sampling as an alternative recruitment strategy for research. Clinical simulation in nursing. 2021;55:37-42.
14. Slettebø T. Participant validation: Exploring a contested tool in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work. 2021;20(5):1223-38.
15. Nazemi M, Torkashvand Z, Samiyazadeh R, Sayyid Hosseininejad S. The Effective Models of Knowledge Management in the Supply Chain. Journal of Management Research Future Quarterly. 2011;22(2):59-74.
16. Yadollahi Farsi J, Azizi M, Mafi B, editors. Diagnosis of International Entrepreneurship Opportunities. National Conference on Entrepreneurial University (Knowledge-based industry), Babolsar, Mazandaran University; 2013.
17. الهامی غ, ملکی مر. طراحی الگوی تضمین کیفیت دارو برای ایران. مجله علمی پژوهشی افق دانش. 2008;14(3):49-63.
18. Bahrami H, Azizi M, Badizadeh A, Rezghi Shirsavar H. Institutional factors affecting the internationalization of pharmaceutical technology companies. Journal of healthcare management. 2019;10(1):19-30.
19. O'dwyer M, Gilmore A, Carson D. Innovative marketing in SMEs. European Journal of Marketing. 2009.
20. Aksoy H. How do innovation culture, marketing innovation and product innovation affect the market performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technology in Society. 2017;51(4):133-41.
21. Altamuro JL, Gray JV, Zhang H. Corporate Integrity Culture and Compliance: A Study of the Pharmaceutical Industry. Contemporary Accounting Research. 2022;39(1):428-58.
22. Dunning JH, Lundan SM. The internationalization of corporate R&D: a review of the evidence and some policy implications for home countries 1. Review of Policy Research. 2009;26(1‐2):13-33.
23. Alon I, Anderson J, Munim ZH, Ho A. A review of the internationalization of Chinese enterprises. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 2018;35(3):573-605.
24. Abok AM. Factors affecting effective implementation of strategic plans in non-governmental organizations in Kenya 2014.
25. Thakur-Wernz P, Cantwell J, Samant S. Impact of international entry choices on the nature and type of innovation: Evidence from emerging economy firms from the Indian bio-pharmaceutical industry. International Business Review. 2019;28(6):101601.
26. Saeedi MR. Fostering Dynamic Capabilities of SMEs. The Impact of Inward International Licensing on Absorptive Capacity and Networking Capability: A Multiple Case Study in Pharmaceutical Industry: Linköping University Electronic Press; 2014.

Abstract Viewed: 4 times pdf Downloaded: 3 times