Bourne RR, Taylor HR, Flaxman SR et al (2016) Number of people blind or visually impaired by glaucoma worldwide and in world regions 1990–2010: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11:e0162229

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M et al (2003) Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol 121:48–56

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA (2014) The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA 311:1901–1911

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Grødum K, Heijl A, Bengtsson B (2002) A comparison of glaucoma patients identified through mass screening and in routine clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80:627–631

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burr JM, Campbell MK, Campbell SE et al (2011) Developing the clinical components of a complex intervention for a glaucoma screening trial: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:54

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Broadway DC (2012) Visual field testing for glaucoma—a practical guide. Community Eye Health 25:66

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Souza N, Cui Y, Looi S et al (2012) The role of optometrists in India: an integral part of an eye health team. Indian J Ophthalmol 60:401

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Heijl A, Krakau C (1975) An automatic static perimeter, design and pilot study. Acta Ophthalmol 53:293–310

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Hernández RA, Burr JM, Vale LD (2008) Economic evaluation of screening for open-angle glaucoma. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 24:203–211

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Daka Q, Mustafa R, Neziri B, Virgili G, Azuara-Blanco A (2022) Home-based perimetry for glaucoma: Where are we now? J Glaucoma 31:361–374

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR (1993) Clinical decisions in glaucoma. Mosby Incorporated

Liu X (2012) Classification accuracy and cut point selection. Stat Med 31:2676–2686

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Casson RJ, Chidlow G, Wood JP, Crowston JG, Goldberg I (2012) Definition of glaucoma: clinical and experimental concepts. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 40:341–349

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stapelfeldt J, Kucur ŞS, Huber N, Höhn R, Sznitman R (2021) Virtual reality–based and conventional visual field examination comparison in healthy and glaucoma patients. Transl Vis Sci Technol 10:10–10

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mees L, Upadhyaya S, Kumar P et al (2020) Validation of a head-mounted virtual reality visual field screening device. J Glaucoma 29:86–91

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shetty V, Sankhe P, Haldipurkar SS et al (2022) Diagnostic performance of the PalmScan VF2000 virtual reality visual field analyzer for identification and classification of glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 17(1):33

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pradhan ZS, Sircar T, Agrawal H et al (2021) Comparison of the performance of a novel, smartphone-based, head-mounted perimeter (GearVision) with the humphrey field analyzer. J Glaucoma 30:e146–e152

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsapakis S, Papaconstantinou D, Diagourtas A et al (2017) Visual field examination method using virtual reality glasses compared with the Humphrey perimeter. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1431–1443

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pierre-Filho PdT, Gomes P, Pierre E, Pierre L (2010) Learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry. Eye 24(5):851–856

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tiwari US, Aishwarya A, Bhale A (2018) Influence of learning effect on reliability parameters and global indices of standard automated perimetry in cases of primary open angle glaucoma. Roman J Ophthalmol 62:277

Article  Google Scholar 

Birt CM, Shin DH, Samudrala V et al (1997) Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population. Ophthalmology 104:1126–1130

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Montolio FGJ, Wesselink C, Gordijn M, Jansonius NM (2012) Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:7010–7017

Article  Google Scholar 

Tan NY, Tham Y-C, Koh V et al (2018) The effect of testing reliability on visual field sensitivity in normal eyes: the Singapore Chinese eye study. Ophthalmology 125:15–21

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yohannan J, Wang J, Brown J et al (2017) Evidence-based criteria for assessment of visual field reliability. Ophthalmology 124:1612–1620

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Okeh U, Okoro C (2012) Evaluating measures of indicators of diagnostic test performance: fundamental meanings and formulars. J Biom Biostat 3:2

Google Scholar 

Klewin KM, Radius RL (1986) Background illumination and automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 104:395–397

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vesti E (2003) Essential perimetry. The field analyzer primer. In: Wiley Online Library