Comparison of temporomandibular joints in relation to ages and vertical facial types in skeletal class II female patients: a multiple-cross-sectional study

Chang CL, Wang DH, Yang MC, Hsu WE, Hsu ML, et al. Functional disorders of the temporomandibular joints: internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(4):223–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cevidanes LH, Hajati AK, Paniagua B, Lim PF, Walker DG, Palconet G, Nackley AG, Styner M, Ludlow JB, Zhu H, Phillips C, et al. Quantification of condylar resorption in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110(1):110–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Noh KJ, Baik HS, Han SS, Jang W, Choi YJ, et al. Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Korean J Orthod. 2021;51(2):126–34.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Saccucci M, Polimeni A, Festa F, Tecco S, et al. Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis. Head Face Med. 2012;8:15.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tecco S, Saccucci M, Nucera R, Polimeni A, Pagnoni M, Cordasco G, Festa F, Iannetti G, et al. Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects. BMC Med Imaging. 2010;10:28.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13(2):97–106.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ahn SJ, Lee SJ, Kim TW, et al. Orthodontic effects on dentofacial morphology in women with bilateral TMJ disk displacement. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(2):288–95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simmons HC 3rd, Oxford DE, Hill MD, et al. The prevalence of skeletal class II patients found in a consecutive population presenting for TMD treatment compared to the national average. J Tenn Dent Assoc. 2008;88(4):16–8. quiz 18–9

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Santander P, Quast A, Olbrisch C, Rose M, Moser N, Schliephake H, Meyer-Marcotty P, et al. Comprehensive 3D analysis of condylar morphology in adults with different skeletal patterns - a cross-sectional study. Head Face Med. 2020;16(1):33.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chae JM, Park JH, Tai K, Mizutani K, Uzuka S, Miyashita W, Seo HY, et al. Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in adolescents with various skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(2):224–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lewandowska A, Mańka-Malara K, Kostrzewa-Janicka J, et al. Sagittal condylar inclination and transversal condylar inclination in different skeletal classes. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2664.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bjork A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42(1):400–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bjork A. Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955;13(1):9–34.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shen G, Darendeliler MA, et al. Darendeliler, The adaptive remodeling of condylar cartilage---a transition from chondrogenesis to osteogenesis. J Dent Res. 2005;84(8):691–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Custodio W, Gomes SG, Faot F, Garcia RC, Del Bel Cury AA, et al. Occlusal force, electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles and mandibular flexure of subjects with different facial types. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(4):343–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ, et al. Condyle and fossa shape in class II and class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(3):337–46.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Krisjane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G, Zepa K, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of TMJ parameters in class II and class III patients. Stomatologija. 2009;11(1):32–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dygas S, Szarmach I, Radej I, et al. Assessment of the morphology and degenerative changes in the temporomandibular joint using CBCT according to the orthodontic approach: a scoping review. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:6863014.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lin M, Xu Y, Wu H, Zhang H, Wang S, Qi K, et al. Comparative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint position and morphology in female patients with skeletal class II malocclusion. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(2):300060519892388.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Diwakar R, Bucci R, Kaushik A, Bansal A, Bucci P, Kochhar AS, Spagnuolo G, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of temporomandibular joint morphology and facial asymmetry in individuals with different vertical skeletal growth patterns. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1437.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khademi B, Karandish M, Paknahad M, Farmani S, et al. Comparison of glenoid Fossa morphology between different sagittal skeletal pattern using cone beam computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(8):e789–92.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

García-Díaz R, Arriola-Guillén LE, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Agudelo-Botero AM, Fiori-Chincaro GA, et al. 2D-3D comparison of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal class II versus class I adults: a retrospective study. Int Orthod. 2020;18(4):784–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Abbaszade H, et al. Correlation between condylar position and different sagittal skeletal facial types. J Orofac Orthop. 2016;77(5):350–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park IY, Kim JH, Park YH, et al. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography based comparison of condylar position and morphology according to the vertical skeletal pattern. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45(2):66–73.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Arieta-Miranda JM, Silva-Valencia M, Flores-Mir C, Paredes-Sampen NA, Arriola-Guillen LE, et al. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:36.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mohsen AM, Ye J, Al-Nasri A, Chu C, Zhang WB, Lin-Wang, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the mandibular condyle in adults with various skeletal patterns. Korean J Orthod. 2023;53(2):67–76.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lobo F, Tolentino ES, Iwaki LCV, Walewski LÂ, Takeshita WM, Chicarelli M, et al. Imaginology tridimensional study of temporomandibular joint osseous components according to sagittal skeletal relationship, sex, and age. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(5):1462–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Katsavrias EG. Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in subjects with class II division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(4):470–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. In: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 2013. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed 8 March 2024.

Hasebe A, Yamaguchi T, Nakawaki T, Hikita Y, Katayama K, Maki K, et al. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(2):306–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ma Q, Bimal P, Mei L, Olliver S, Farella M, Li H, et al. Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary-mandibular skeletal patterns: a 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149(7):589–98.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pullinger A, Hollender L. Variation in condyle-fossa relationships according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;62(6):719–27.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yale SH, Allison BD, Hauptfuehrer JD, et al. An epidemiological assessment of mandibular condyle morphology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966;21(2):169–77.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lopez TT, Michel-Crosato E, Benedicto EN, Paiva LA, Silva DC, Biazevic MG, et al. Accuracy of mandibular measurements of sexual dimorphism using stabilizer equipment. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Fillingim RB, Wallet SM, et al. Estrogen-induced Monocytic response correlates with TMD pain: a case control study. J Dent Res. 2017;96(3):285–91.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sümbüllü MA, Cağlayan F, Akgül HM, Yilmaz AB, et al. Radiological examination of the articular eminence morphology using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41(3):234–40.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kim HO, Lee W, Kook YA, Kim Y, et al. Comparison of the condyle-fossa relationship between skeletal class III malocclusion patients with and without asymmetry: a retrospective three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomograpy study. Korean J Orthod. 2013;43(5):209–17.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kattiney de Oliveira L, Fernandes Neto AJ, Moraes Mundim Prado I, Guimarães Henriques JC, Beom Kim K, de Araújo AG, et al. Evaluation of the condylar position in younger and older adults with or without temporomandibular symptoms by using cone beam computed tomography. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;127(3):445–52.

Article  PubMed 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif