Samdani AF, Ames RJ, Kimball JS et al (2014) Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year results. Spine 39:1688–1693
Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Ofluoglu E et al (2020) Thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum of 2 years’ results of 21 patients. J Pediatr Orthop 40:575–580
Hoernschemeyer DG, Boeyer ME, Robertson ME et al (2020) Anterior vertebral body tethering for adolescent scoliosis with growth remaining: a retrospective review of 2 to 5-year postoperative results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:1169–1176
Alanay A, Yucekul A, Abul K et al (2020) Thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up curve behavior according to sanders skeletal maturity staging. Spine 45:E1483–E1492
Miyanji F, Pawelek J, Nasto LA et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of anterior vertebral body tethering in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Bone Joint J. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0426.R1
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Erdag Y et al (2021) Double-sided vertebral body tethering of double adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves: radiographic outcomes of the first 13 patients with 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 30:1896–1904
Trobisch PD, Kobbe P, Baroncini A (2020) Dynamic scoliosis correction as alternative treatment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a non-fusion surgical technique. Z Orthop Unfall 158:641–646
Trobisch PD, Baroncini A (2021) Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus a 2-tether construct. Eur Spine J 30:3570–3576
Mathew SE, Milbrandt TA, Larson AN (2022) Measurable lumbar motion remains 1 year after vertebral body tethering. J Pediatr Orthop 42:e861–e867
Trobisch PD, Castelein R, Da Paz S (2023) Radiographic outcome after vertebral body tethering of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 32:1895–1900
Boeyer ME, Farid S, Wiesemann S, Hoernschemeyer DG (2023) Outcomes of vertebral body tethering in the lumbar spine. Spine Deform 11:909–918
Baroncini A, Migliorini F, Eschweiler J, Hildebrand F, Trobisch P (2022) The timing of tether breakage influences clinical results after vbt. Eur Spine J 31:2362–2367
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shankar D, Eaker L, von Treuheim TDP et al (2022) Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: how well does the tether hold up? Spine Deform 10:799–809
Yang MJ, Samdani AF, Pahys JM et al (2023) What happens after a vertebral body tether break? Incidence, location, and progression with five-year follow-up. Spine 48:742–747
Baroncini A, Trobisch P, Eschweiler J, Migliorini F (2022) Analysis of the risk factors for early tether breakage following vertebral body tethering in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 31:2348–2354
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nicolini LF, Kobbe P, Seggewiß J et al (2022) Motion preserving surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 31:1013–1021
Nicolini LF, Oliveira RC, Ribeiro M et al (2023) Tether pre-tension within vertebral body tethering reduces motion of the spine and influences coupled motion: a finite elemente analysis. Comput Biol Med 169:107851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107851
Trobisch P, Baroncini A, Berrer A, Da Paz S (2022) Difference between radiographically suspected and intraoperatively confirmed tether breakages after vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 31:1045–1050
Larson AN, Marks MC, Gonzalez Sepulveda JM et al (2024) Non-fusion versus fusion surgery in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis: what trade-offs in outcomes are acceptable for the patient and family? J Bone Joint Surg Am 106:2–9
留言 (0)